Case: EEOC v. MOTOROLA, INC.

1:01-cv-07507 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2001

Closed Date: Jan. 10, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2001, the Chicago Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Motorola Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging discrimination on the basis of religion in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant failed to accommodate the religious observance requests of the complaining parties and terminated their employment. Following some discovery, the parties settled the lawsuit through a consent decree in January 2002.

The one-year consent decree, containing anti-discrimination and retaliation clauses, required the defendant to: report complaints and make other compliance reports, keep records of compliance and make them available to the EEOC for inspection, post notice of employee rights, provide EEO training, and pay $30,000 to be distributed among two complaining parties and $30,000 to their attorney.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (3/10/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-07507

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Motorola Inc

Jan. 10, 2002

Jan. 10, 2002

Docket
1

1:01-cv-07507

Complaint

EEOC v. Motorola, Inc.

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

Complaint

1:01-cv-07507

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Motorola, Inc.

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 15, 2024, 3:17 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; Jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson, Noelle Christine Brennan as attorney(s) for plaintiff (No summons(es) issued.) (Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (cem) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

2

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Michael A. Warner, Susan F. Gallagher, Anne Elizabeth Duprey; Notice (rmm) (Entered: 10/18/2001)

Oct. 17, 2001

Oct. 17, 2001

3

WAIVER of service of summons as to defendant Motorola Inc sent on 9/28/01 (rmm) (Entered: 10/18/2001)

Oct. 17, 2001

Oct. 17, 2001

4

REFERRAL ORDER of 10/31/01 The case is referred to the Hon. Martin C. Ashman from the Hon. Blanche M. Manning pursuant to Local Rule 72.1 to conduct hearings and enter appropriate orders on the following pretrial motion/matter: Discovery supervision. Settlement conference. Perform such additional duties as are not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States. Exceptions or additions: All nondispositive pretrial motions. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (rmm) (Entered: 11/02/2001)

Oct. 31, 2001

Oct. 31, 2001

SCHEDULE set on 11/7/01 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Status hearing set to 10:00 11/21/01 in courtroom 1386. Mailed notice (is) (Entered: 11/07/2001)

Nov. 7, 2001

Nov. 7, 2001

SCHEDULE set on 11/21/01 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Status hearing held. Written discovery closed by 3/15/02. Oral discovery ordered closed on 4/19/02. Dispositive motions are due 5/17/02. Settlement conference set for 2:00 12/18/01 in chambers 1366. Time to response to the complaint is extended to 1/2/02. All clients and parties with full authority to settle are to be physically present. Failure to have parties with full authority to settle present may result in the imposition of severe sanctions. (For further details see standing order distributed in open court.) Mailed notice (is) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

Nov. 21, 2001

Nov. 21, 2001

5

MINUTE ORDER of 12/18/01 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : The court having been notified that this case has settled, the settlement conference is stricken. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge. Terminating the case referral to Hon. Martin C. Ashman Telephoned notice (rmm) (Entered: 12/19/2001)

Dec. 18, 2001

Dec. 18, 2001

6

MINUTE ORDER of 12/28/01 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning : Pursuant to minute order of 12/18/01, parties have informed the court that this case has settled. This case is hereby dismissed. Parties to submit a stipulation to this court by 01/25/02. terminating case Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 01/02/2002)

Dec. 28, 2001

Dec. 28, 2001

7

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff by Ann M Henry (rmm) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

8

AGREED MOTION by plaintiff and defendant for entry of consent decree (Attachments); Notices (rmm) Modified on 01/14/2002 (Entered: 01/14/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

9

MINUTE ORDER of 1/10/02 by Hon. Blanche M. Manning : Agreed motion for entry of consent decree is granted [8-1]. (Entered consent decree in favor of plaintiff and against defendant (Attachment)). Mailed notice (rmm) (Entered: 01/14/2002)

Jan. 10, 2002

Jan. 10, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 28, 2001

Closing Date: Jan. 10, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Motorola, Inc. (Schaumburg, Illinois), Private Entity/Person

Motorola, Inc. (Arlington Heights, Illinois), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 60000

Order Duration: 2002 - 2003

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Accommodation / Leave

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits