University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. Catholic Healthcare West (d/b/a Northridge Medical Hospital Center) EE-CA-0153
Docket / Court 2:06-cv-01915-DDP-SS ( C.D. Cal. )
State/Territory California
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
On March 30, 2006, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Catholic Healthcare West (d/b/a Northridge Hospital Medical Center) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of the Title VII of ... read more >
On March 30, 2006, the Los Angeles District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Catholic Healthcare West (d/b/a Northridge Hospital Medical Center) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. The defendant was alleged to have a policy of restricting the duties of pregnant employees to lessen their exposure to radiation. Both parties moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment. In January 2008, the court granted summary judgment to the EEOC on the issue of liability, sending the question of punitive damages to the jury. The parties immediately began settlement negotiations.

A consent decree was filed for this case on August 28, 2008. The consent decree required the defendant to pay $155,000 to be divided between two complainants; hire an EEOC Consultant to monitor compliance with Title VII and the decree; provide training in the form of live sessions to its employees each year; post notices of EEO rights; and distribute its policies on discrimination. The decree had a duration of 33 months. 530 F. Supp. 2d 1096.

Keri Livingston - 05/23/2008
Gabriela Hybel - 10/27/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Content of Injunction
Discrimination Prohibition
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Monitoring
Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law
Provide antidiscrimination training
Recordkeeping
Reporting
Retaliation Prohibition
Discrimination-area
Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)
Discrimination-basis
Pregnancy discrimination
Sex discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Pattern or Practice
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) Catholic Healthcare West
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration 2008 - 2010
Case Closing Year 2008
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:06-cv-01915-DDP-SS (C.D. Cal.) 04/18/2008
EE-CA-0153-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Stipulated Protective Order Pursuant to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Regulation 45 C.F.R. Section 164.512; Order 08/28/2007 (C.D. Cal.)
EE-CA-0153-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Re Cross Motions for Summary Judgment 01/03/2008 (530 F.Supp.2d 1096) (C.D. Cal.)
EE-CA-0153-0002.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Consent Decree 08/29/2008
EE-CA-0153-0003.pdf | Detail
Document Source: District Court
Judges Segal, Suzanne H. (C.D. Cal.) [Magistrate]
EE-CA-0153-0001
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Li, Derek W (California)
EE-CA-0153-0001 | EE-CA-0153-9000
Park, Anna Y. (California)
EE-CA-0153-0003 | EE-CA-0153-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Miller Savitt, Linda C (California)
EE-CA-0153-9000
Weber, Julie (California)
EE-CA-0153-0001 | EE-CA-0153-0003 | EE-CA-0153-9000
Williams, George Chester III (California)
EE-CA-0153-0003 | EE-CA-0153-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -