University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Duran v. Elrod JC-IL-0002
Docket / Court 1:74-cv-02949 ( N.D. Ill. )
State/Territory Illinois
Case Type(s) Jail Conditions
Case Summary
On October 11, 1974, pretrial detainees in the custody of the Cook County, Illinois, Department of Corrections brought a class action suit against county officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging violations of their rights under the ... read more >
On October 11, 1974, pretrial detainees in the custody of the Cook County, Illinois, Department of Corrections brought a class action suit against county officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging violations of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to provide safe and humane conditions of confinement. The plaintiffs were represented in part by the MacArthur Justice Center of the University of Chicago. The District Court (Judge Thomas R. McMillen, Jr.) dismissed three of the fifteen claims raised in the complaint, and the plaintiff pretrial detainees appealed. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Chief Judge Thomas Edward Fairchild) reversed, holding that pretrial detainees may suffer no more restrictions than are reasonably necessary to ensure their presence at trial. Duran v. Elrod, 542 F.2d 998 (7th Cir. 1976). The Court of Appeals found that the District Court erred in striking the portion of the complaint alleging lack of visiting privileges with families and friends and lack of sufficient telephones. The District Court also erred in dismissing the portion of the complaint relating to adequacy of recreation, exercise and living facilities.

A consent decree was later entered by the District Court (Judge Milton I. Shadur, Jr.) on April 9, 1982. The decree called for the renovation and modernization of the county jail facilities, increasing staff personnel, improvement in food services and provision of personal hygiene supplies, increased access to the law library, more physical exercise periods and increased hours for visitation. The decree also provided that the John Howard Association would monitor the implementation of the decree by submitting reports every six months to the court. The District Court retained jurisdiction over the case in order to enforce as necessary the decree's provisions.

In October 1982, the John Howard Association submitted their first six month report regarding jail conditions. The report indicated an insufficient number of jail beds which forced many inmates to sleep on the floor, sometimes without mattresses or blankets. On January 25, 1983, the District Court ordered a population ""cap"" of 4500 inmates at the jail. This figure was arrived at to assure that each inmate would have a bed. The defendants, county officials, subsequently moved for relief from the population cap order and requested the approval of emergency ""double-bunking"" of the inmates even though one provision of the decree specifically forbade double-bunking. Judge Shadur denied these motions on March 22, 1983, and ordered the county officials to release the inmates held with the lowest amount of bail in order to meet the population cap. The county officials immediately appealed. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Senior District Court Judge Robert A. Grant, sitting by designation) affirmed by holding that county officials were not entitled to modification of the consent decree to permit emergency double-bunking and that the District Court did not exceed its authority in directing the release of low-bond pretrial detainees as necessary to reach the population cap. Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292 (7th Cir. 1983). The U.S. Supreme Court denied the county officials' petition for a writ of certiorari. Elrod v. Duran, 465 U.S. 1108 (1984).

In 1984, Cook County released over 15,000 inmates to avoid double-bunking, and on March 27, 1985, the county filed a motion requesting the District Court to modify the consent decree to allow double-bunking of accused felons until May 15, the completion date for renovations at the jail that would add more beds. The District Court denied this motion, noting that the county had dragged its heels in constructing new facilities. On April 26, 1985, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Judge Richard Allen Posner) reversed, finding that the motion to permit double-bunking should have been granted because the period was not extensive, refusal to grant relief would result in the release of 500 accused felons, and the prohibition on double-bunking was not required by the Constitution. Duran v. Elrod, 760 F.2d 756 (7th Cir. 1985). The Court of Appeals thus ordered modification of the decree to allow double-bunking until May 15, 1985, but at the same time noted its dissatisfaction with the county's response to jail overcrowding. Judge Joel Martin Flaum dissented from the Court of Appeals' decision and noted that there was not a sufficient showing to justify a finding of abuse of discretion by the District Court.

The docket for the early part of the case was not available on PACER, and accordingly, we do not have further information on that part of the litigation.

The PACER docket begins in 1993, by which time the case was before Judge George M. Marovich. It shows litigation from 1993 through 2012 concerning compliance with the court's order and attorneys' fee awards pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996. During this time, the John Howard Association continued to file periodic reports monitoring the county's compliance with the decree. On November 24, 2004, Judge Marovich granted the plaintiffs' motion for a finding of civil contempt. That motion was terminated on March 8, 2005. On January 12, 2006, Judge Marovich modified the consent decree to allow for an Electronic Monitoring Program to be operated by Cook County. The case was reassigned to Judge Virginia M. Kendall on September 1, 2006.

On February 29, 2008 the court assigned John Howard Association to monitor the effectiveness of the defendants' plan to eliminate overcrowding and report to the court. On July 8, 2009 the plaintiffs made a motion for overcrowding and staffing relief, alleging that the defendants defaulted on their prior February 2008 agreement to eliminate crowding. On July 17, 2009 the court found that there is currently no overcrowding at the Cook County Jail, and so the plaintiff's motion for Implementation of Proposal for Elimination of Overcrowding in the Jail was denied without prejudice as moot. The Court also found that defendants were in violation of part of the Consent Decree in that the defendants had not hired staff members to fully staff the facility in spite of their agreement to do so in February 2006. The defendants were directed to hire 210 correctional officers.

On June 10, 2011, both parties moved for the court to approve a voluntarily dismissal and after fairness hearings and on November 30, 2011 the order was granted.

Kristen Sagar - 05/24/2007
Abigail DeHart - 10/20/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Content of Injunction
Monitor/Master
Reporting
Crowding
Crowding / caseload
Pre-PLRA Population Cap
Defendant-type
Corrections
Jurisdiction-wide
General
Food service / nutrition / hydration
Law library access
Recreation / Exercise
Sanitation / living conditions
Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Totality of conditions
Visiting
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendant(s) Cook County
Cook County
Plaintiff Description pretrial detainees in the custody of the Cook County, Illinois
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Attorneys fees
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 1982 - 2011
Case Closing Year 2011
Case Ongoing No
Case Listing JC-IL-0048 : United States v. Cook County (N.D. Ill.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies After Decision: Implementation of Judicial Decrees in Correctional Settings
Written: Oct. 01, 1977
By: M. Kay Harris & Dudley P. Spiller (Temple University)
Citation: (1977)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ]

Docket(s)
74-2949 (N.D. Ill.) 02/22/2012
JC-IL-0002-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Opinion 10/22/1976 (542 F.2d 998)
JC-IL-0002-0005.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Opinion 10/06/1983 (713 F.2d 292)
JC-IL-0002-0004.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Memorandum Decision 03/19/1984 (465 U.S. 1108)
JC-IL-0002-0006.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Westlaw
Reported Opinion 04/26/1985 (760 F.2d 756)
JC-IL-0002-0003.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Docket Entry 01/12/2006 (N.D. Ill.)
JC-IL-0002-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Notification of Docket Entry [Status Hearing Held] 07/17/2009 (N.D. Ill.)
JC-IL-0002-0007.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order 11/30/2011 (N.D. Ill.)
JC-IL-0002-0008.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Fairchild, Thomas Edward (Seventh Circuit)
JC-IL-0002-0005
Grant, Robert Allen (N.D. Ind.)
JC-IL-0002-0004
Kendall, Virginia Mary (N.D. Ill.)
JC-IL-0002-0007 | JC-IL-0002-0008 | JC-IL-0002-9000
Marovich, George Michael (N.D. Ill.)
JC-IL-0002-0001 | JC-IL-0002-9000
Posner, Richard Allen (Seventh Circuit)
JC-IL-0002-0003
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Bowman, Locke E. III (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Elson, Sally T. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0004
Grippando, Thomas J. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0005
Lehrer, Robert E. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0003 | JC-IL-0002-0004 | JC-IL-0002-9000 | JC-IL-0002-9000
Redleaf, Diane L. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Snelling, Phillip H. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0004
Defendant's Lawyers Colman, Jeffrey D. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
DeWolfe, Ruthanne (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0003 | JC-IL-0002-9000
Driscoll, Patrick T. Jr. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Gallagher, Daniel Francis (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Guolee, Terrence Franklin (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Hauser, Henry A. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0003 | JC-IL-0002-0004
Hess, Richard Jay (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0003 | JC-IL-0002-0004 | JC-IL-0002-0005 | JC-IL-0002-9000
Kowalczyk, Lawrence S. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Lanzito, Dominick L. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Luchtenburg, Russell J. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Lyons, Robert Francis (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
McConnell, Stephen J. (Pennsylvania)
JC-IL-0002-9000
O'Grady, Paul A (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Oberts, William B. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Partee, Cecil A. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Pechous, Donald J. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Stasica, Lawrence R. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Sullivan, Thomas P. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Theobald, Edward R. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000
Weinstein, Frederic B. (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-0005
Other Lawyers Johnson, Patrick Walter (Illinois)
JC-IL-0002-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -