Case: EEOC v. PHILIPS COMMUNICATION

2:01-cv-04929 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Sept. 28, 2001

Closed Date: Nov. 1, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Philips Communication & Security Systems, Inc., in September of 2001, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The only document available from PACER is the docket. From the docket we can find that the case was resolved by consent decree on the day the trial was supposed to begin, November 1, 2002. No other documentation of the case or the consent decree is available.

Summary Authors

Alex Bean (6/26/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:01-cv-04929

Docket

EEOC v. Philips Communication

Nov. 1, 2002

Nov. 1, 2002

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 15, 2024, 3:12 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

Complaint. (aam) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

Summons(es) issued; 1 original mailed to: Counsel 9/28/01 (aam) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

Demand for jury trial by PLAINTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT (aam) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

Standard Case Management Track. (aam) (Entered: 09/28/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

2

Affidavit of: Gerald Taylor re: served summons and complaint upon (person who refused to give name and title) DEFENDANT PHILIPS COMMUNICATIO . Served by: Personal Service on 10/18/01 . (afm) (Entered: 11/09/2001)

Nov. 8, 2001

Nov. 8, 2001

3

Affidavit of: Gerald Taylor re: served summons and complaint upon person not cooperative on behalf of DEFENDANT PHILIPS COMMUNICATIO . Served by: Personal Service on 10/18/01 . (afm) (Entered: 11/19/2001)

Nov. 19, 2001

Nov. 19, 2001

4

Amended complaint by PLAINTIFF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT. (td) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

Nov. 21, 2001

Nov. 21, 2001

Summons(es) on amended complaint issued. Mailed to counsel 11/21/01. (td) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

Nov. 21, 2001

Nov. 21, 2001

5

Answer to Complaint by DEFENDANT PHILIPS COMMUNICATIO with Affirmative Defenses to plaintiff's first amended complaint, Certificate of Service. (afm) (Entered: 12/24/2001)

Dec. 24, 2001

Dec. 24, 2001

ISSUE JOINED. (afm) (Entered: 12/24/2001)

Dec. 24, 2001

Dec. 24, 2001

Preliminary Pre-trial conference will be held at 4:45 on 1/30/02 (afm) (Entered: 01/14/2002)

Jan. 11, 2002

Jan. 11, 2002

6

SCHEDULING ORDER THAT COUNSEL SHALL JOINTLY REPORT TO COURT IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5/30/02 WITH RESPECT TO AS WHETHER CASE IS SETTLED, FURTHER ORDERED THAT CASE SHALL PROCEED AS DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 8/8/02 ; ANY MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE FILED BY 8/22/02 ; PLAINTIFF'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 10/18/02 ; DEFENDANT'S PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM DUE 10/25/02 ; THIS CASE WILL BE PLACED ON THE TRIAL LIST ON 11/1/02 ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JAN E. DUBOIS ) 2/4/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (afm) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

Feb. 1, 2002

Feb. 1, 2002

7

CONSENT DECREE WITH COURT APPROVAL. ( SIGNED BY JUDGE JAN E. DUBOIS ) 11/4/02 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (afm) (Entered: 11/04/2002)

Nov. 1, 2002

Nov. 1, 2002

Case closed (kv) (Entered: 11/08/2002)

Nov. 1, 2002

Nov. 1, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 28, 2001

Closing Date: Nov. 1, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Philips Communication & Security Systems, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits