University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO. EE-ID-0001
Docket / Court CIV98-0378-S-BLW ( D. Idaho )
State/Territory Idaho
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
In September 1998, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Amalgamated Sugar Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho. The complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against ... read more >
In September 1998, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against the Amalgamated Sugar Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho. The complaint alleged that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against Hispanic workers. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that although several individuals had worked for the defendant in previous years as seasonal workers, the defendant refused to hire them again because they were not proficient in spoken English.

There was extensive discovery during the litigation and a stipulation to dismiss the claims of one complainant. The defendant's motion for summary judgment was denied. After a consent to trial by magistrate, a nine-day jury trial ensued. The jury found in favor of the defendant on May 11, 2000. The defendant was awarded fees in the amount of $5479.85.

Jason Chester - 07/02/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Discrimination-area
Hiring
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
National Origin/Ethnicity
Indian
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) Amalgamated Sugar Company, Inc.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None
Source of Relief Litigation
None
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year 2000
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:98-cv-00378-LMB (D. Idaho) 05/25/2007
EE-ID-0001-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 09/25/1998
EE-ID-0001-0001 PDF | Detail
Protective Order 10/15/1999 (D. Idaho)
EE-ID-0001-0002 PDF | Detail
Memorandum Decision, Order [in part] 01/11/2000 (D. Idaho)
EE-ID-0001-0003 PDF | Detail
Judgment on Jury Verdict 05/11/2000 (2000 WL 35724770) (D. Idaho)
EE-ID-0001-0004 PDF | WESTLAW | Detail
Judgment 11/06/2000 (D. Idaho)
EE-ID-0001-0005 PDF | Detail
Order 06/28/2001
EE-ID-0001-0006 PDF | Detail
Judges None on record
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -