Case: EEOC v. Federal Express, Inc.

1:01-cv-04366 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: June 28, 2001

Closed Date: Jan. 12, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The New York district office of the EEOC brought this suit against Federal Express, Inc. in June 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint apparently alleged religious discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Attorney General's Office, State of New York intervened in July 2001 and filed a complaint. Federal Express, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment which the court granted with respect to the EEOC, but not with respect …

The New York district office of the EEOC brought this suit against Federal Express, Inc. in June 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The complaint apparently alleged religious discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Attorney General's Office, State of New York intervened in July 2001 and filed a complaint. Federal Express, Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment which the court granted with respect to the EEOC, but not with respect to the Attorney General's Office. The EEOC moved for reconsideration, but was denied. EEOC v. Federal Express Corporation, 268 F.Supp.2d 192 (E.D.N.Y. 2003). Additional complainants also intervened. After a settlement conference, the parties settled the case in January 2006 by entry of a settlement agreement.

The settlement agreement between the Attorney General's Office and Federal Express, Inc. required Federal Express to adopt an anti-discrimination policy, and post and distribute through its employee handbook a notice of employee rights to all employees. The agreement also required Federal Express to adopt a policy whereby employees whose personal appearance does not comply with the stated dress code are allowed to submit a request for an exception; when the employee's request for an exception is based on a sincerely held religious belief, Federal Express is required to accommodate the employee so long as it does not impose undue hardship on Federal Express' business. The agreement had a term of two years and two months. In the event of non-compliance, the Court retained jurisdiction to ensure compliance.

Summary Authors

Justin Kanter (5/23/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-04366

Docket [PACER]

Jan. 19, 2006

Jan. 19, 2006

Docket
46

1:01-cv-04366

Opinion

June 17, 2003

June 17, 2003

Order/Opinion

268 F.Supp.2d 268

136-2

1:01-cv-04366

Consent Decree

Jan. 12, 2006

Jan. 12, 2006

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 20, 2024, 3:10 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed and summons(es) issued for Federal Express, Inc (Villanueva, William) (Entered: 06/28/2001)

June 28, 2001

June 28, 2001

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Viktor V. Pohorelsky (Villanueva, William) (Entered: 06/28/2001)

June 28, 2001

June 28, 2001

2

AMENDED COMPLAINT by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [1−1] (Johnson, Tanya) (Entered: 07/16/2001)

July 5, 2001

July 5, 2001

DEMAND for jury trial by Equal Employment Opp. (As per doc #2) (Johnson, Tanya) (Entered: 07/16/2001)

July 5, 2001

July 5, 2001

3

LETTER dated 7/11/01 from Gregory B Richards, Esq., to Tynia Richards stating that this action has been reassigned to attorney Stephen R. Cochell, Esq. (Johnson, Tanya) (Entered: 07/17/2001)

July 13, 2001

July 13, 2001

15

Calendar entry: Pre−motion conference held before Judge Garaufis; Court Reporter: Marsha Diamond. Office of the Attorney General's Office, State of New York − Motion to intervene is granted. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

July 26, 2001

July 26, 2001

5

STIPULATION extending time for dft. to answer or respond to the complaint to 9/18/01 . (Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 8/30/01). C/M. (DiLorenzo, Krista) (Entered: 08/30/2001)

Aug. 29, 2001

Aug. 29, 2001

6

Calendar entry: Pre−motion conference held before Judge Garaufis on 9/11/01; ESR: Winnie Valentin. Dft motion to dismiss 9/25; opposition 16; reply 10/26; oral argument 11/2 @ 10:00. (Lee, Tiffeny) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 09/14/2001)

Sept. 11, 2001

Sept. 11, 2001

7

TRANSCRIPT filed for [6−1] Pre−Motion Conference before Judge Garaufis for dates of 9/11/01; Transcription Service: Transcription Plus II. (fwd'd to chambers) (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Sept. 28, 2001

Sept. 28, 2001

8

LETTER dated 9.24.01 from Dwayne Byrd, Esq. to Counsel apologizing for misunderstanding the Judge's directions regarding certain correspondence. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/09/2001)

Oct. 9, 2001

Oct. 9, 2001

9

LETTER dated 9.28.01 from AAG Tynia Richard, Esq. to Counsel advising that because of the attack on the WTC their current phone and fax numbers are inoperable and furnishing email address and cell phone number. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

Oct. 10, 2001

Oct. 10, 2001

10

ORDER granting application for extension of briefing schedule as follows: dft to serve motion to dismisss by 10/19; opposition papers by 11/29; reply by 12/14. (signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, on 10/10/01) {copies mailed} (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/15/2001)

Oct. 15, 2001

Oct. 15, 2001

11

LETTER dated 10/19/01 from Traycee Ellen Klein, Esq. to Counsel furnishing motion to dismiss and supporting papers. {fwd'd to chambers} (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/29/2001)

Oct. 29, 2001

Oct. 29, 2001

12

ORDER granting OAG's request to modify the motion to dismiss briefing schedule as follows: OAG's opposition served by 12/5; Dft's reply by 12/20. Control date for oral argument is set for 1/18/02 @ 11:00. Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, on 11/27/01. See letter dated 11/26/01 from AAG Tynia Richards to Judge Garaufis. c/m {fwd'd to chambers} (Lee, Tiffeny) Modified on 11/27/2001 (Entered: 11/27/2001)

Nov. 27, 2001

Nov. 27, 2001

14

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by People of the State of New York against Federal Express, Inc. (Guzzi, Roseann) (Entered: 12/21/2001)

Dec. 13, 2001

Dec. 13, 2001

16

MOTION by Federal Express, Inc to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint ; Motion hearing set for 12/29/01 . (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

17

MEMORANDUM by Federal Express, Inc in support of their [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

18

AFFIRMATION in support of dft by Federal Express, Inc's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

19

SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIRMATION in support of dft Federal Express, Inc's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

20

EEOC's MEMORANDUM of law in opposition to dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

21

AFFIDAVIT of Michael B. Ranis, Esq. on behalf of Equal Employment Opp in opposition to dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

25

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Federal Express, Inc in further support of dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 14, 2001

Dec. 14, 2001

13

ORDER granting dft's application for permission to file a reply memorandum of up to 15 pages. (signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, on 12/14/01) {C/M} (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 12/19/2001)

Dec. 19, 2001

Dec. 19, 2001

23

DECLARATION of Tynia D. Richard, Esq. on behalf of People of the State in opposition to dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

24

Plaintiffs−Intervenors' MEMORANDUM of law in opposition to to dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

26

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Federal Express, Inc in further support of dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss the complaint−in−intervention and motion to strike. (not the same as document # 25) (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Dec. 21, 2001

Dec. 21, 2001

27

AFFIRMATION of Stephen R. Cochell, Esq. on behalf of Federal Express, in support of dft's [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 10, 2002

Jan. 10, 2002

28

Calendar entry: Oral argument held before Judge Garaufis on 1/18/2; ESR: Stephanie Drexler. Decision reserved. Pro hac vice motion granted for Stephen Cochell. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

Jan. 18, 2002

Jan. 18, 2002

29

LETTER dated 1/23/2 from Dwayne Byrd, Managing Director of Litigation to Judge Garaufis furnishing the latest People Manuel section regarding personnel appearance. (attachment) (returned to chambers) (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 02/01/2002)

Jan. 31, 2002

Jan. 31, 2002

30

ORDER, for Stephen Cochell to appear pro hac vice; Fee #: $25.00, Receipt #: 257998 . Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, on 2/21/2. c/m (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002

Feb. 27, 2002

32

LETTER dated 4/8/2 from Michael Ranis, Esq. to Judge Garaufis regarding problem EEOC has experienced reconstructing its file in this case. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 04/15/2002)

April 8, 2002

April 8, 2002

31

LETTER dated 4/8/2 from Michael Ranis, Esq. to Judge Garaufis advising that the EEOC no longer requires the Court's intervention regarding file production from FedEx. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 04/15/2002)

April 15, 2002

April 15, 2002

33

MEMORANDUM and ORDER granting in part, denying in part [16−1] motion to dismiss and strike pltff's amended complaint: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order, FedEx's motion to dismiss against the EEOC, construed by this court as a motion for summary judgment, is granted. FedEx's motion to strike Count IV of the complaint−in−intervention, brought pursuant to New York Executive Law 63:12, is granted. FedEx's motion is denied in all other respects. (signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, on 9/16/02). (Fahey, Lauren) (Entered: 09/27/2002)

Sept. 18, 2002

Sept. 18, 2002

47

MOTION for Reconsideration (EEOC's Motion for reconsideration of 9/16/2002 order) by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 06/18/2003)

Sept. 27, 2002

Sept. 27, 2002

34

MOTION by Federal Express Corporation for reconsideration of the Court's [33−1] Memorandum &Order ; Motion hearing not set. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

35

MEMORANDUM by Federal Express Corporation in support of their [34−1] motion for reconsideration of the Court's [33−1] Memorandum &Order. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

36

MEMORANDUM by Federal Express, Inc in opposition to [34−1] motion for reconsideration of the Court's [33−1] Memorandum &Order. (Fahey, Lauren)

Oct. 28, 2002

Oct. 28, 2002

38

ORDER, endorsed on letter dated 11/12/02 from Stephen Cochell to Judge Garaufis: Application granted for a 3 day extension of time for Dft to file a reply memorandum in support of FedEx's Motion for Reconsideration. (signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, on 11/14/02). C/M. (Fahey, Lauren) (Entered: 11/15/2002)

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

39

Plaintiff−Intervenors' Memorandum of Law in opposition to dft's [34−1] motion for reconsideration. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

40

Declaration of Yynia D. Richard in opposition to dft's [34−1] motion for reconsideration. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

41

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Federal Express, Inc in further of its [34−1] motion for reconsideration. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

42

NOTICE of attorney appearance for People of the State by Brian J. Kreiswirth. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/16/2003)

Jan. 9, 2003

Jan. 9, 2003

43

LETTER dated 3/24/03 from Brian Kreoswirth to Judge Garaufis, written to request a scheduling conference in the above case. (Dobkin, David) (Entered: 04/10/2003)

April 10, 2003

April 10, 2003

44

LETTER dated 4/7/03 from Traycee Ellen Klein to NGG opposing the request the court to hold discovery in abeyance until outstanding motions have been decided. (Glenn, Marilyn) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

April 15, 2003

April 15, 2003

45

LETTER dated Aprill 9, 2003 from Brian J, Kreiswirth, AAG to Judge Garaufis oppsing the OAG's 4/7/3 letter request to commence discovery. (fwd'd to NGG) (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 04/28/2003)

April 28, 2003

April 28, 2003

46

MEMORANDUM &ORDER denying FedEx and the EEOC's motions for reconsideration.Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on June 13, 2003. c/m (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 06/17/2003)

June 17, 2003

June 17, 2003

48

ORDER: (Dft FedEx's) Stay application denied. So Ordered. Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on June 30, 2003. Endorsed on 6/23 letter from Traycee Klein, Esq. to NGG. c/m(Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 07/07/2003)

July 7, 2003

July 7, 2003

49

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Nicholas G. Garaufis : Status Conference held on 7/18/2003. OAG to file amended complaint subject to FedEx agreement not to file motion to dismiss. (Court Reporter Holly Driscoll) (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 07/23/2003)

July 18, 2003

July 18, 2003

50

Letter written to seek a stay pending clarification on how this matter will now proceed. (Dobkin, David) (Entered: 07/23/2003)

July 23, 2003

July 23, 2003

52

AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Federal Express, Inc., filed by People of the State of New York.(Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 07/24/2003)

July 23, 2003

July 23, 2003

51

Letter dated 7/7/2003 from AAG Kreiswirth to NGG requesting that FedEx be directed to answer the OAG's complaint−in−intervention w/i 30 from the date of this letter or 8/7/2003.. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 07/24/2003)

July 24, 2003

July 24, 2003

53

ANSWER and Defenses to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand by Federal Express, Inc. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 08/26/2003)

Aug. 25, 2003

Aug. 25, 2003

54

DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by Federal Express, Inc. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 08/26/2003)

Aug. 25, 2003

Aug. 25, 2003

55

ORDER setting a conference before the undersigned for 9/23/2003 @ 11:30 am. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 8/29/2003. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 09/03/2003)

Sept. 3, 2003

Sept. 3, 2003

56

ORDER granting counsel's application for adjournment of the 9/23/2003 conference. Conference is set for 9/30/2003 @ 2:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. See 9/8 letter from Traycee E. Klein, Esq. to MJ Pohorelsky. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 09/16/2003)

Sept. 16, 2003

Sept. 16, 2003

58

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky: Discovery Hearing held on 9/30/2003. The next conference will be held 1/15/2004, 9:30 a.m. See calendar for rulings. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/07/2003)

Sept. 30, 2003

Sept. 30, 2003

59

ORDER setting a motion conference in the above case on 10/30/2003 at 10:30a.m. before Mag. Pohorelsky. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 10/15/2003. (Dobkin, David) (Entered: 10/20/2003)

Oct. 20, 2003

Oct. 20, 2003

60

ORDER, (endorsed on letter dated 10/21/03 from Traycee Klein to Mag. Pohorelsky), the conference is adjourned to 11/7/03 at 9:30. (Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 10/3/03). (Piper, Francine) (Entered: 11/03/2003)

Nov. 3, 2003

Nov. 3, 2003

64

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky: Pre Motion Conference held on 11/7/2003. The intervention motion shall be briefed as follows: a) intervenors shall file (and submit courtesy copies to the court) the moving papers previously prepared at the earliest possible time; b) dft. shall file opposition by 12/8/03; c) intervenors shall file their reply by 1/8/04; d) oral argument shall be held at the conf. rescheduled below. The conf. is rescheduled for 1/22/04 at 9:30. (DiLorenzo, Krista) (Entered: 11/19/2003)

Nov. 7, 2003

Nov. 7, 2003

61

MOTION to Intervene by Christopher Polk, Michael Escoffery, Kenneth Dickens, Marvin Davis, Torricel Angelo. {proposed intervenors' complaint attached} (Lee, Tiffeny) Modified on 11/14/2003 (Lee, Tiffeny). (Entered: 11/14/2003)

Nov. 10, 2003

Nov. 10, 2003

62

MEMORANDUM in Support of 61 MOTION to Intervene by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

Nov. 10, 2003

Nov. 10, 2003

63

Affirmation of Counsel in Support of 61 MOTION to Intervene by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

Nov. 10, 2003

Nov. 10, 2003

65

Federal Express Corporation's MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Proposed 61 MOTION to Intervene. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 12/12/2003)

Dec. 8, 2003

Dec. 8, 2003

66

Affirmation of Counsel in Support of Federal Express Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Proposed Plaintiff−Intervenors' Motion to Intervene. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 12/12/2003)

Dec. 8, 2003

Dec. 8, 2003

67

ORDER : The deadlines are extended as requested herein. The oral argument is rescheduled to Monday, February 9, 2004 @ 3:00 p.m. Defendant shall notify all parties, see document for scheduling. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. Endorsed on 12/11 letter from Stephen Cochell, Esq. to MJ Pohorelsky. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 01/14/2004)

Dec. 15, 2003

Dec. 15, 2003

68

Plaintiff−Intervenors' REPLY to Defendant's Opposition to Their Motion to Intervene, filed by Eric Steele, Esq. on behalf of Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk. W/Certificate of Service attached. (Latka−Mucha, Wieslawa) (Entered: 02/06/2004)

Feb. 3, 2004

Feb. 3, 2004

69

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Motion Hearing held on 2/9/2004 re 61 MOTION to Intervene filed by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk. Report and recommendation reserved. Hearing on discovery motions made by plaintiff Office of the Attorney General and Defendant Federal Express. See annexed calendar. (Pohorelsky, Viktor) (Entered: 02/09/2004)

Feb. 9, 2004

Feb. 9, 2004

70

ORDER; Granting the application requesting an extention of time to serve plaintiff−intervenors' Reply to the defendant's opposition to the Motion to intervene also request that the plaintiff intervenors have until 01/23/04 to serve their reply . Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on undated. (Sica, Michele) (Entered: 02/11/2004)

Feb. 11, 2004

Feb. 11, 2004

71

ORDER; Granting the application for the request that the time for the parties to submit their doscovery dispute letters with the court be extended from 1/21/04 until 1/27/04 and that responsive letters, if any be submitted on 2/2/04. (see ltr dtd 1/21/04 by Traycee Ellen Klein) . Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on undated. (Sica, Michele) (Entered: 02/11/2004)

Feb. 11, 2004

Feb. 11, 2004

72

ORDER; GRANTING the application for additional time for Fedex to serve the meet and confer letters from 01/13/04 to 01/21/04 and an extention of responses to said letters from 01/21/04 to 01/28/04. (see ltr dtd 01/09/04) . Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on undated. (Sica, Michele) (Entered: 02/12/2004)

Feb. 12, 2004

Feb. 12, 2004

73

Letter dated 2/13/2004 from AAG Kreiswirth to MJ Pohorelsky submitting a list of citations re: attorney work product protection, Exhibits A−E. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 03/05/2004)

Feb. 13, 2004

Feb. 13, 2004

78

ORDER endorsed on letter dated 2/23/04 from Stephen Cochell to Mag. Pohorelsky. The conference is adjorned to 3/23/04 at 2:00 p.m. Defendant's counsel shall notify all parties. So Ordered. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. (Black, Amanda) (Entered: 06/04/2004)

Feb. 24, 2004

Feb. 24, 2004

77

ORDER: The conference scheduled for 3/23/2004 is adjourned to 4/20/2004 @ 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. Endorsed on 3/11 letter from Dwayne Byrd, Esq. to MJ Pohorelsky.(Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 05/24/2004)

April 12, 2004

April 12, 2004

74

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Settlement conference held on 4/20/2004. A settlement conference will be held on 5/20/04 @ 9:30 a.m. Individuals with plenary settlement authority must be available by telephone for all parties. The parties shall endeavor in good faith to provide information to each other as identified in conference with the court as promptly as possible regarding backpay calculations. (Drayton, Lorraine) (Entered: 04/28/2004)

April 20, 2004

April 20, 2004

91

MOTION for Limited Admission of Jeana M. Littrell by Federal Express, Inc.. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 08/16/2004)

April 29, 2004

April 29, 2004

75

Letter dated 3/16/04 from Brain J. Kreiswirth to Judge Pohorelsky Regarding requesting that the settlement conference be rescheduled from the current date of 3/23/04 to 3/29/04 or 4/5/04. (Drayton, Lorraine) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

May 6, 2004

May 6, 2004

76

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Status Conference held by telephone on 5/20/2004. Parties report progress regarding settlement. Settlement conference with court scheduled (see annexed calendar). (Pohorelsky, Viktor) (Entered: 05/20/2004)

May 20, 2004

May 20, 2004

79

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Viktor V. Pohorelsky : Settlement conference held on 7/14/2004. Next conference on 10/14/04 at 11:30 AM. (entered on 2/27/04)(Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

July 14, 2004

July 14, 2004

104

MOTION to Intervene by Nigel Loney. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/05/2004)

July 28, 2004

July 28, 2004

105

MEMORANDUM in Support of 104 MOTION to Intervene by Nigel Loney. (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/05/2004)

July 28, 2004

July 28, 2004

80

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 MOTION to Intervene filed by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk Objections to RRdue by 8/19/2004. Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 08/02/04. (Pohorelsky, Viktor) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

Aug. 2, 2004

Aug. 2, 2004

81

ORDER referring Nigel Loney's motion to intervene to Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky. Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on July 29, 2004. c/em(Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 08/03/2004)

Aug. 3, 2004

Aug. 3, 2004

82

Letter dtd 10/28/03 to Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky from Natalie R. Williams, requesting that the Court explore the issue of settlement at the Nov. 7, 2003 conference. (Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/04/2004)

Aug. 4, 2004

Aug. 4, 2004

84

Letter dtd Jan. 26, 2004 to Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky, from Brian J. Kreiswirth, concerning discovery disputes. (filed with Exhibits A, B, C, D and E)(Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/10/2004)

Aug. 10, 2004

Aug. 10, 2004

85

Letter dtd Jan. 7, 2004 to Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky from Brian J. Kreiswirth, responding to defendant Federal Express Corporation's Motion to Intervene.(Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/10/2004)

Aug. 10, 2004

Aug. 10, 2004

86

Letter dtd Jan. 27, 2004 to Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky from Stephen Cochell, senior counsel for Federal Express. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 37.3, FedEx sets out its position with respect to various discovery disputes. A copy of the Office of the Attorney General's responses to Fed Ex's interrogatories, document requests and privilege log, the relevant discovery materials, are attached. (filed with Exhibits A. B and C.)(Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/10/2004)

Aug. 10, 2004

Aug. 10, 2004

87

Letter dtd Feb. 2, 2004 to Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky from Stephen Cochell, responding to the Attorney General's correspondence dated 1/26/04, regarding discovery in this case. FedEx requests the OAG's requests be denied.(filed with Exhibits D, E and F.) (Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/10/2004)

Aug. 10, 2004

Aug. 10, 2004

88

Letter dtd 4/29/04 to Clerk of Court, enclosing check in amount of $25.00, for the filing fee of Jeana M Littrell's Pro Hac Motion. (Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

Aug. 12, 2004

Aug. 12, 2004

89

Letter dtd July 28, 2004 to Clerk of the Court from Henry L. Saurborn, Jr.informing the Court we are filing a Motion to Intervene on behalf of Mr. Nigel Loney. We request that it be referred for a Report and Recommendation to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky. (Schillat, Louise) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

Aug. 12, 2004

Aug. 12, 2004

90

SCHEDULING ORDER: schedule for briefing of motion to intervene by Nigel Loney . Signed by Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 08/13/2004. (Pohorelsky, Viktor) (Entered: 08/13/2004)

Aug. 13, 2004

Aug. 13, 2004

92

ORDER granting 91 Motion for Limited Admission by Jeana M. Littrell. Signed by JudgeViktor V. Pohorelsky on 08/18/04. (Pohorelsky, Viktor) (Entered: 08/18/2004)

Aug. 18, 2004

Aug. 18, 2004

93

OBJECTION to 80 Report and Recommendations Concerning Motion to Intervene by Federal Express, Inc.. (Klein, Traycee) (Entered: 08/19/2004)

Aug. 19, 2004

Aug. 19, 2004

94

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation served on Eric Steele, Esq. on August 19, 2004, filed by Federal Express, Inc.. (Klein, Traycee) (Entered: 08/19/2004)

Aug. 19, 2004

Aug. 19, 2004

95

ORDER ADOPTING 80 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky; and, granting 61 Motion to Intervene filed by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk. Signed by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/9/2004. c/m; c/em(Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

Sept. 10, 2004

Sept. 10, 2004

96

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2004−08: You are required to file all original documents electronically. In the future, please ensure that all original documents in this action are filed electronically. Clearly marked hard copy−courtesy documents should be submitted to Chambers. Courtesy copies should also indicate that the original of the submitted document has already been electronically filed. C/EM; C/M (Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

Sept. 10, 2004

Sept. 10, 2004

97

Notice of MOTION to Intervene Opposition to Loney Motion by all defendants. (Littrell, Jeana) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

Sept. 10, 2004

Sept. 10, 2004

98

RESPONSE in Opposition re 61 MOTION to Intervene, 80 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 MOTION to Intervene filed by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk filed by Torricel Angelo. (Steele, Eric) (Entered: 09/20/2004)

Sept. 20, 2004

Sept. 20, 2004

100

AMENDED DOCUMENT by Federal Express, Inc.. Amendment to 97 Notice of MOTION to Intervene Opposition to Loney Motion . (Littrell, Jeana) (Entered: 09/24/2004)

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

101

REPLY to Response to Motion re 97 Notice of MOTION to Intervene Opposition to Loney Motion filed by Nigel Loney. (Saurborn, Henry) (Entered: 09/24/2004)

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

103

EXHIBIT: DHR Determination, by Torricel Angelo, Marvin Davis, Kenneth Dickens, Michael Escoffery, Christopher Polk..(Lee, Tiffeny) (Entered: 10/01/2004)

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

Case Details

State / Territory: New York

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 28, 2001

Closing Date: Jan. 12, 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal Express, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Order Duration: 2002 - 2004

Content of Injunction:

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Hiring

Promotion

Discrimination-basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit