University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. SAKO CORPORATION EE-MP-0009
Docket / Court 1:05-cv-00022 ( D. N. Mar. I. )
State/Territory Northern Mariana Islands
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
On July 12, 2005, the San Francisco and Honolulu offices of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit under Title VII against the Sako Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands. Since we only have the docket for this case, we are unsure of the nature ... read more >
On July 12, 2005, the San Francisco and Honolulu offices of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a lawsuit under Title VII against the Sako Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands. Since we only have the docket for this case, we are unsure of the nature of the complaint.

On December 2, 2005, the plaintiffs asked the district court to record an entry of default, since the defendants had failed to respond to the summons that was issued to them. On February 27, 2006, the district court entered an order dismissing the case with prejudice. The next day, the plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration, and on March 1, 2006, the district court issued an order vacating the dismissal of the case. On March 4, 2006, the district court once again dismissed the case, this time without prejudice, and ordered that the plaintiffs would be able to re-open the case should circumstances change.

Kristen Sagar - 02/13/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) Sako Corporation
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None
Source of Relief None
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year 2006
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:05-cv-00022 (D. N. Mar. I.) 05/04/2006
EE-MP-0009-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
[Order Granting] Ex-Parte Motion for Dismissal 05/04/2006 (D. N. Mar. I.)
EE-MP-0009-0001 PDF | Detail
Judges None on record
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -