University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. AUTOZONE STORES EE-FL-0009
Docket / Court 3:06-cv-00862-TJC-MCR ( M.D. Fla. )
State/Territory Florida
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The Miami District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Autozone, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in September 2006. The complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A female employee was allegedly ... read more >
The Miami District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Autozone, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in September 2006. The complaint alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A female employee was allegedly subjected to sexual harassment and then illegally discharged for asserting her rights. The complainant intervened in the EEOC's suit. The case was ongoing in the district court as of 4/22/2008. The defendant has moved for summary judgment and in March the court set argument for the motion on 7/1/2008.

Kevin Wilemon - 05/27/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Discrimination-area
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Discrimination-basis
Sex discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
No EEOC Final Resolution Type
Private Party intervened in EEOC suit
General
Disparate Treatment
Retaliation
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
State Anti-Discrimination Law
Defendant(s) Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
3:06-cv-00862-TJC-MCR (M.D. Fla.) 04/15/2008
EE-FL-0009-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 09/29/2006
EE-FL-0009-0002.pdf | Detail
Intervenor's Complaint and Demand for Jury Trail 12/18/2006
EE-FL-0009-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [Granting motion for Protective Order] 12/07/2007 (M.D. Fla.)
EE-FL-0009-0003.pdf | Detail
Order [Denying Motion to quash and/or Motion for protective order] 12/18/2007 (M.D. Fla.)
EE-FL-0009-0004.pdf | Detail
Order [granting Motion to compel] 02/22/2008 (M.D. Fla.)
EE-FL-0009-0005.pdf | Detail
Judges Corrigan, Timothy J. (M.D. Fla.) [Magistrate]
EE-FL-0009-0005
Richardson, Monte C. (M.D. Fla.) [Magistrate]
EE-FL-0009-0003 | EE-FL-0009-0004
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -