University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. TANAMI TRADING CORPORATION (d/b/a LEFT LANE EXPRESS) EE-AR-0047
Docket / Court 5:06-cv-00252-JLH ( E.D. Ark. )
State/Territory Arkansas
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
In September, 2006 the Little Rock Area Office and Memphis Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Tanami Trading Corporation, doing business as, Left Lane Express, in the U.S. District Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas alleging discrimination on the basis of race, African-American, ... read more >
In September, 2006 the Little Rock Area Office and Memphis Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Tanami Trading Corporation, doing business as, Left Lane Express, in the U.S. District Office for the Eastern District of Arkansas alleging discrimination on the basis of race, African-American, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged the defendant subjected the complaining parties to a hostile work environment and constructively discharged some of them. The case had not been resolved as of April 22, 2008, with the last event being a status report by the EEOC on April 17, 2008.

Daisy Manning - 05/19/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Discrimination-area
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Discrimination-basis
Race discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
No EEOC Final Resolution Type
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) Tanami Trading Corporation
Tanami Trading Corporation
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None
Source of Relief None
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
5:06-cv-00252-JLH (E.D. Ark.) 04/17/2008
EE-AR-0047-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 09/29/2006
EE-AR-0047-0001 PDF | Detail
Judges Forster, John F. Jr. (E.D. Ark.) [Magistrate]
EE-AR-0047-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -