University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. Pvnf, L.L.C. D/B/A Daggett Motors EE-NM-0039
Docket / Court CIV 03 0991 JEC/WDS ( D.N.M. )
State/Territory New Mexico
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
In August 2003, the EEOC's Phoenix office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against PVNF LLC d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. Specifically, the EEOC alleged ... read more >
In August 2003, the EEOC's Phoenix office filed this suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona against PVNF LLC d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. Specifically, the EEOC alleged the defendant created a hostile work environment for pregnant women and all females through verbal abuse, including disparaging remarks and insults directed at all pregnant women, sexist remarks and anti-female remarks. In addition, the EEOC alleged that the defendant denied women payments for insurance premiums and retaliated against women who opposed the unlawful practices. In April 2004, the parties reached a consent decree, which was adopted by the court, that settled the suit regarding pregnancy discrimination claims. The sexism claims proceeded to trial, following cross motions for summary judgment, in May 2005. Following a four day trial, the defendant moved for and was granted a Judgment as a Matter of Law. The EEOC unsuccessfully moved to amend the judgment and for a new trial before filing an appeal in December 2005. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part and remanded the case for a new trial because it found that a reasonable jury could determine that the complainants were subjected to a hostile work environment. It allowed the judgment as a matter of law for the defendant to stand on the issue of whether a particular complainant was constructively discharged.

Tony Friedman - 08/25/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Content of Injunction
Develop anti-discrimination policy
Discrimination Prohibition
Expungement of Employment Record
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Monitoring
Neutral/Positive Reference
Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law
Provide antidiscrimination training
Recordkeeping
Reporting
Retaliation Prohibition
Discrimination-area
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Pay / Benefits
Discrimination-basis
Pregnancy discrimination
Sex discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Retaliation
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) PVNF LLC
PVNF LLC
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
None
Source of Relief None
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration 2005 - 2008
Case Closing Year 2005
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:03-cv-00991-JEC-WDS (D.N.M.) 02/14/2006
EE-NM-0039-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
06-2011 (U.S. Court of Appeals) 05/14/2007
EE-NM-0039-9001.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 08/25/2003
EE-NM-0039-0001.pdf | Detail
Consent Decree [] 04/26/2004
EE-NM-0039-0002.pdf | Detail
Order [re: Motion to Compel] 04/28/2004 (D.N.M.)
EE-NM-0039-0003.pdf | Detail
Memorandum Opinion and Order [re: Summary Judgment] 03/09/2005 (D.N.M.)
EE-NM-0039-0004.pdf | Detail
Memorandum Opinion and Order [Granting Summary Judgment] 03/17/2005 (D.N.M.)
EE-NM-0039-0005.pdf | Detail
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 06/30/2005
EE-NM-0039-0006.pdf | Detail
Memorandum Opinion and Order 11/02/2005 (D.N.M.)
EE-NM-0039-0007.pdf | Detail
[USCA Opinion] 05/14/2007 (487 F.3d 790)
EE-NM-0039-0008.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Judges None on record
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -