Case: EEOC v. LONG PRAIRIE PACKING COMPANY, INC.

0:99-cv-01253 | U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Filed Date: Aug. 11, 1999

Closed Date: 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's Milwaukee and Minneapolis offices filed this suit on August 11, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The suit alleged that defendant Long Prairie Packing violated Title VII and the ADA through a pattern or practice of sexual and disability-based harassment of men. According to the EEOC, this was the first class action suit alleging a pattern of male-on-male sexual harassment. On the date the complaint was filed, the parties also filed a joint motion for entr…

The EEOC's Milwaukee and Minneapolis offices filed this suit on August 11, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. The suit alleged that defendant Long Prairie Packing violated Title VII and the ADA through a pattern or practice of sexual and disability-based harassment of men. According to the EEOC, this was the first class action suit alleging a pattern of male-on-male sexual harassment.

On the date the complaint was filed, the parties also filed a joint motion for entry of consent decree. The court entered the consent decree on August 13, 1999. The case remained open after entry of the consent decree so the court could oversee the EEOC's distribution of the settlement to the class-members.

The defendant agreed to create a settlement fund containing $1,900,000 to be distributed to class-members through the EEOC. The defendant also agree to provide training, institute a new complaint procedure and develop a new discrimination during the 3-year consent decree.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (2/21/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

0:99-cv-01253

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Long Prairie Packing

June 16, 2000

June 16, 2000

Docket
2

0:99-cv-01253

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Long Prairie Packing Company, Inc.

Aug. 11, 1999

Aug. 11, 1999

Settlement Agreement

EEOC Press Release

EEOC v. Long Prairie Packing Company, Inc.

No Court

Aug. 11, 1999

Aug. 11, 1999

Press Release

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 17, 2024, 3:15 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT - No Summons issued. Assigned to Judge Ann D. Montgomery per civil rights list and referred to Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson. (6 99ul 83)(6 pgs) (MKC) (Entered: 08/12/1999)

Aug. 11, 1999

Aug. 11, 1999

2

JOINT MOTION for entry of consent decree ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) . (2 pgs) (MKC) (Entered: 08/12/1999)

Aug. 11, 1999

Aug. 11, 1999

3

CONSENT DECREE ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery, 8/12/99 ) [2-1] (21 pgs)(cc: all counsel) (MKC) (Entered: 08/13/1999)

Aug. 13, 1999

Aug. 13, 1999

4

MOTION by plaintiff for approval of Distribution of Payment Pursuant to Consent Decree ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery . ) (1 pg) (MKC) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

March 10, 2000

March 10, 2000

5

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion for approval of Distribution of Payment Pursuant to Consent Decree. [4-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

March 10, 2000

March 10, 2000

6

DECLARATION of Lloyd Zimmerman in support of motion for approval of Distribution of Payment Pursuant to Consent Decree. [4-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC) (Entered: 03/13/2000)

March 10, 2000

March 10, 2000

7

AMENDED MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion for approval of Distribution of Payment Pursuant to Consent Decree [4-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

March 13, 2000

March 13, 2000

8

DECLARATION of Lloyd Zimmerman re motion for approval of Distribution of Payment Pursuant to Consent Decree . [4-1] (sealed) (separate) (MKC) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

March 13, 2000

March 13, 2000

9

ORDER ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) that the EEOC's determinations are approved as consistent with the terms of the decree [4-1] 2pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (SJH) (Entered: 03/24/2000)

March 23, 2000

March 23, 2000

10

MOTION by plaintiff for Final Approval of Disribution of Payments Pursuant to Consent Decree ( to Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) . (1 pg) (MKC) (Entered: 05/12/2000)

May 10, 2000

May 10, 2000

11

DECLARATION of Lloyd Zimmerman re motion for Final Approval of Disribution of Payments Pursuant to Consent Decree. [10-1] (sealed)(separate) (MKC) (Entered: 05/12/2000)

May 10, 2000

May 10, 2000

12

ORDER ( Judge Ann D. Montgomery ) that the allocations made by the EEOC are approved; the EEOC is authorized to request the payment agent to pay the awards in the manner provided in the consent decree [10-1] 1pg(s) (cc: all counsel) (SJH) (Entered: 05/12/2000)

May 10, 2000

May 10, 2000

13

NOTICE for return of documents under seal. (1pg(s) (CJF) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

June 16, 2000

June 16, 2000

Case Details

State / Territory: Minnesota

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 11, 1999

Closing Date: 1999

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Long Prairie Packing, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 1900000

Order Duration: 1999 - 2002

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Issues

General:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Male

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits