Case: EEOC v. TELE-SERVICING INNOVATIONS, INC.

4:03-cv-00221 | U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Filed Date: May 29, 2003

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Seattle Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Tele-Servicing Innovations, Inc. in June 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. The complaint alleged that Tele-Servicing intentionally terminated the complainant in retaliation for her participation in protected EEO activity, including the filing of internal complaints of sexual harassment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The complainant intervened alleging gender discrimination, s…

The Seattle Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Tele-Servicing Innovations, Inc. in June 2003 in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. The complaint alleged that Tele-Servicing intentionally terminated the complainant in retaliation for her participation in protected EEO activity, including the filing of internal complaints of sexual harassment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The complainant intervened alleging gender discrimination, sexual harassment and a hostile work environment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII and Idaho Human Rights Act. She also alleged breach of employment contract, breach of covenant of good faith, and negligent or intentional infliction of emotional distress. After the defendant failed to answer the complaint, the intervenor-plaintiff and the EEOC moved for entry of default against Tele-Servicing in October and November 2003 respectively. Default judgment against Tele-Servicing was awarded to the plaintiffs in June 2004.

The default judgment awarded a total of $208,833 to the plaintiffs. The intervenor-plaintiff was awarded $8,240 in back pay plus $593 in pre-judgment interest, $125,000 in compensatory damages and $75,000 in punitive damages. The court permanently enjoined Tele-Servicing from engaging in any employment practice constituting retaliation based on a person engaging in EEO activity.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (5/28/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:03-cv-00221

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

July 12, 2006

July 12, 2006

Docket
1

4:03-cv-00221

Complaint

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

May 29, 2003

May 29, 2003

Complaint
7

4:03-cv-00221

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

July 11, 2003

July 11, 2003

Pleading / Motion / Brief
12

4:03-cv-00221

Intervenor's Complaint

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

Aug. 11, 2003

Aug. 11, 2003

Complaint
19

4:03-cv-00221

Entry of Default

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

Dec. 22, 2003

Dec. 22, 2003

Order/Opinion
30

4:03-cv-00221

Default Judgment

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

Order/Opinion
32-1

4:03-cv-00221

Deponent's Objection to Subpeona

EEOC v. Tele−Servicing Innovations

Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 17, 2024, 3:17 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) issued) (jml) (Entered: 06/04/2003)

June 2, 2003

June 2, 2003

Clearinghouse
2

NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge and Requirement for Consent sent to counsel for plaintiff re complaint [1−1] (jml)

June 4, 2003

June 4, 2003

3

OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REASSIGNMENT of case to Honorable B. Lynn Winmill (cc: all counsel) (SEALED) (dkh)

June 19, 2003

June 19, 2003

4

NOTICE of case number change (dkh)

June 19, 2003

June 19, 2003

5

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for def by Gregory L Crockett (wm) (Entered: 07/02/2003)

July 1, 2003

July 1, 2003

6

MOTION by Brittney Baker to intervene (wm)

July 11, 2003

July 11, 2003

7

MEMORANDUM by intervenor−pla Brittney Baker in support of motion to intervene [6−1] (wm)

July 11, 2003

July 11, 2003

Clearinghouse
8

MOTION by def to withdraw attorney (wm)

July 31, 2003

July 31, 2003

9

DECLARATION of Katherine Steele Moriarty in support of motion to withdraw attorney [8−1] (wm)

July 31, 2003

July 31, 2003

10

ORDER by Honorable B. Lynn Winmill granting motion to withdraw attorney [8−1] ; terminating attorney Gregory L Crockett for Tele−Servicing Innov ; Case Mgmt ddl set for 9/1/03 for dft Tele−Servicing to file notice of representation (cc: all counsel) (wm)

Aug. 11, 2003

Aug. 11, 2003

11

ORDER by Honorable B. Lynn Winmill granting motion to intervene [6−1] (cc: all counsel) (wm)

Aug. 11, 2003

Aug. 11, 2003

12

INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT by intervenor−pla Brittney Baker (wm)

Aug. 11, 2003

Aug. 11, 2003

Clearinghouse
13

SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Katherine Steele Moriarty in support of motion to withdraw attorney [8−1] (wm)

Aug. 21, 2003

Aug. 21, 2003

14

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL of Tracy D. Belton regarding order [10−2] (wm)

Sept. 22, 2003

Sept. 22, 2003

15

MOTION by intervenor−plaintiff Brittney Baker for entry of default as to Tele−Servicing Innov , and for attorney fees (wm) (Entered: 10/31/2003)

Oct. 30, 2003

Oct. 30, 2003

16

CLERKS ENTRY OF DEFAULT ENTERED as to def Tele−Servicing Innov (wm) (Entered: 11/13/2003)

Nov. 12, 2003

Nov. 12, 2003

17

MOTION by pla for entry of default as to Tele−Servicing Innov (wm) (Entered: 11/17/2003)

Nov. 14, 2003

Nov. 14, 2003

18

DECLARATION of Wesley Katahira re motion for entry of default as to Tele−Servicing Innov [17−1] (wm) (Entered: 11/17/2003)

Nov. 14, 2003

Nov. 14, 2003

20

AFFIDAVIT of Brittney Baker regarding order default [19−1] (wm) (Entered: 02/09/2004)

Feb. 6, 2004

Feb. 6, 2004

21

APPLICATION by intervenor−pla Brittney Baker for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innov (wm)

Feb. 17, 2004

Feb. 17, 2004

22

APPLICATION by pla for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innovations Inc (ja) (Entered: 03/05/2004)

March 4, 2004

March 4, 2004

23

ORDER by Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Re: Submission of briefing (cc: all counsel) (dkh)

March 24, 2004

March 24, 2004

24

ORDER by Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Re: EEOC submissions (cc: all counsel) (dkh)

March 24, 2004

March 24, 2004

25

DECLARATION of Brittney Baker re motion for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innovations Inc [22−1] (wm) (Entered: 04/29/2004)

April 28, 2004

April 28, 2004

26

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM by pla in support of motion for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innovations Inc [22−1] (wm) (Entered: 05/03/2004)

April 30, 2004

April 30, 2004

27

DECLARATION of Brittney Baker re motion for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innovations Inc [22−1] (wm) (Entered: 05/03/2004)

April 30, 2004

April 30, 2004

28

DECLARATION of Wesley Katahira re motion for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innovations Inc [22−1] (wm) (Entered: 05/03/2004)

April 30, 2004

April 30, 2004

29

JOINDER by intervenor−plaintiff Brittney Baker joining memorandum [26−1] (wm) (Entered: 05/04/2004)

April 30, 2004

April 30, 2004

30

DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Honorable B. Lynn Winmill Judgment for plas in the amount of $ 208,240.00; granting motion for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innovations Inc [22−1], granting motion for default judgment against Tele−Servicing Innov [21−1] dismissing case (cc: all counsel) (JUDGMENT SCANNED) (wm) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

Clearinghouse
31

AFFIDAVIT of Service for Subpoena served on Jeffrey Neiswanger on 9/7/2005. (jlg, ) (Entered: 09/14/2005)

Sept. 12, 2005

Sept. 12, 2005

32

REPLY filed by Jeff Neiswanger. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Objection to Subpoena)(Crockett, Gregory) Modified on 9/16/2005 to create link to 31 Affidavit of Service of Subpoena (jlg, ).

Sept. 14, 2005

Sept. 14, 2005

33

First MOTION to Amend/Correct 31 Affidavit of Service, First MOTION for Protective Order, First MOTION to Quash by Jeff Neiswanger. Responses due by 10/11/2005 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum in Support of Objection to Subpoena)(Crockett, Gregory)

Sept. 16, 2005

Sept. 16, 2005

34

DOCKET ENTRY ORDER finding as moot 33 Motion to Amend/Correct, finding as moot 33 Motion for Protective Order, and finding as moot 33 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by sbh)

July 12, 2006

July 12, 2006

Case Details

State / Territory: Idaho

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 29, 2003

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Tele-Servicing Innovations, Inc (Idaho Falls), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

State Anti-Discrimination Law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Amount Defendant Pays: 208833

Content of Injunction:

Retaliation Prohibition

Issues

General:

Retaliation

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit