Case: EEOC v. Excel Corporation

2:01-cv-00364 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Filed Date: May 24, 2001

Closed Date: June 28, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2001, the San Antonio District Office of the EEOC filed this lawsuit against Excel Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We do not have a copy of the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. The charging parties intervened in the lawsuit in February 2002. Following a transfer of venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, some discovery and mediation, the parties settled the lawsuit in June 2002 through a consent decree.

The one year decree, containing an anti-retaliation clause, required the defendant to: distribute a notice regarding employee rights to all managers for signature and pay $20,000 to be distributed among two complainants.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (1/11/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:01-cv-00364

Docket [PACER]

July 5, 2002

July 5, 2002

Docket
32

2:01-cv-00364

Consent Decree

June 28, 2002

June 28, 2002

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 2, 2024, 3:12 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

DEMAND for jury trial by plaintiff EEOC (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

May 24, 2001

May 24, 2001

2

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Excel Corporation 7/5/01 (1) (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

July 6, 2001

July 6, 2001

3

TRANSFER ORDER Transferring case to the docket of Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele (signed by Judge David Briones) Copies to counsel: 7/13/01 Page(s) 1 (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

July 13, 2001

July 13, 2001

4

ANSWER to Complaint by defendant Excel Corporation (5) (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

July 23, 2001

July 23, 2001

5

MOTION by defendant to transfer venue (14) (djs) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Aug. 16, 2001

Aug. 16, 2001

6

RESPONSE by plaintiff to [5-1] motion to transfer venue (13)(djs) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Aug. 28, 2001

Aug. 28, 2001

7

REPLY by defendant to response to [5-1] motion to transfer venue (5) (djs) Modified on 10/01/2001 (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Sept. 10, 2001

Sept. 10, 2001

8

ORDER OF TRANSFER granting [5-1] motion to transfer venue to the ND/TX Amarillo Division (signed by Judge Garnett Thomas Eisele) Copies to counsel: 9/25/01 Page(s) 4 (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Sept. 25, 2001

Sept. 25, 2001

Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from District of WD/TX El Paso Division (EP-01-cv-169) (djs) (Entered: 10/01/2001)

Oct. 1, 2001

Oct. 1, 2001

9

ORIGINAL RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER setting Joining of Parties on 11/16/01; Amending of Pleadings on 3/29/02; Discovery cutoff 4/1/02; Deadline for filing of dispositive motions 4/15/02; Pretrial materials (Designation of Experts) due on 12/3/01. Parties shall be ready for trial by 6/3/02. Counsel shall file a joint report setting forth the status of settlement negotiations by 1/4/02. Parties opposing affirmative relief must file a written designation of expert witnesses by 12/24/01. Summary Judgment deadline 4/1/02 and deadline for Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures is 5/6/02. ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 10/3/01 Page(s): 3 (plh) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

Oct. 3, 2001

Oct. 3, 2001

10

MOTION by Excel Corporation to substitute S Tom Morris for Charles C High, Jr. (5) (plh) (Entered: 10/05/2001)

Oct. 5, 2001

Oct. 5, 2001

11

ORDER SUBSTITUTING NEW COUNSEL granting [10-1] motion to substitute S Tom Morris for Charles C High, Jr. ; terminated attorney Charles C High Jr for Excel Corporation ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 10/17/01 Page(s) 2 (jeh) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

Oct. 17, 2001

Oct. 17, 2001

12

AGREED ORDER - The Original Rule 16 Scheduling Order dted 10/2/01 is amended in the following respects. The Rule 26(f) conference is deferred until Friday, 11/2/01, and the Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures will be exchanged within 14 days after the Rule 26(f) conference. (Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 10/23/01 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

Oct. 23, 2001

Oct. 23, 2001

13

Designation of Experts by plaintiff EEOC (2) (jeh) (Entered: 12/04/2001)

Dec. 4, 2001

Dec. 4, 2001

14

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DESIGNATE EXPERTS denying [13-1] designation. The Court construes this pleading as a motion for an unspecified extension of time to designate experts. (Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 12/5/01 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 12/05/2001)

Dec. 5, 2001

Dec. 5, 2001

15

Designation of Experts by defendant Excel Corporation (2) (jeh) (Entered: 12/20/2001)

Dec. 20, 2001

Dec. 20, 2001

16

JOINT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation (2) (jeh) (Entered: 01/03/2002)

Jan. 3, 2002

Jan. 3, 2002

17

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to amend [9-1] Scheduling order (4) (jeh) (Entered: 01/14/2002)

Jan. 14, 2002

Jan. 14, 2002

18

NOTICE of attorney appearance for plaintiff EEOC by Selena N Solis (2) (jeh) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Jan. 16, 2002

Jan. 16, 2002

19

MOTION to intervene by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro (6) (jeh) (Entered: 02/08/2002)

Feb. 8, 2002

Feb. 8, 2002

20

MEMORANDUM by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro in support of [19-1] motion to intervene by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro (3) (jeh) (Entered: 02/08/2002)

Feb. 8, 2002

Feb. 8, 2002

21

ORDER granting [17-1] motion to amend [9-1] Scheduling order resetting scheduling order deadlines: Parties shall be ready for trial by 8/5/02; Deadline for filing Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures 7/8/02; Amending of Pleadings on 5/31/02; Discovery deadline on 6/1/02; Deadline for filing of dispositive motions, except motions in limine, by 6/17/02; Motions for summary judgment 6/3/02 ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 2/12/02 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 02/12/2002)

Feb. 12, 2002

Feb. 12, 2002

22

ORDER granting [19-1] motion to intervene by movant Francisco nmn Acosta, movant Sergio Castro. The Clerk will file the Intervenors' complaint in intervention upon its prompt tender in proper form for filing. ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 2/12/02 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 02/12/2002)

Feb. 12, 2002

Feb. 12, 2002

23

ORDER referring case to Mediation; Type of ADR: Non-Binding Mediation Requested by: Court. Order of the Court that on or before 3/1/02, the parties in this case tender to the Clerk a written document indicating the name of the mediator chosen by the parties and an agreed time, date and place for mediation. Parties shall meet prior to mediation for the purposes of settling this case and after this meeting, tender to the Clerk for filing on or before 3/1/02 a joint settlement conference status report. Parties to this action shall convene a mediation conference on all claims and/or counter-claims, such conference and all subsequent conferences to be completed on or before 3/22/02. ( Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson ) Copies to counsel: 2/13/02 Page(s): 3 (plh) (Entered: 02/13/2002)

Feb. 13, 2002

Feb. 13, 2002

24

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by Francisco nmn Acosta, Sergio Castro against defendant Excel Corporation (3) (jeh) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 22, 2002

Feb. 22, 2002

25

ANSWER by defendant Excel Corporation to [24-1] intervenor complaint (2) (jeh) (Entered: 02/22/2002)

Feb. 22, 2002

Feb. 22, 2002

26

JOINT SETTLEMENT STATUS REPORT by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation, intervenor-plaintiff Francisco nmn Acosta, intervenor-plaintiff Sergio Castro, intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation; Parties have not been able to resolve this case. (3) (jeh) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002

Feb. 27, 2002

27

JOINT NOTICE of MEDIATION by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation, intervenor-plaintiff Francisco nmn Acosta, intervenor- plaintiff Sergio Castro, intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation - Mike Loftin designated as mediator; mediation set for 3/12/02 @ 10:00 a.m., Underwood Law Firm, Amarillo, Texas (2) (jeh) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002

Feb. 27, 2002

28

Alternative Dispute Resolution Summary. Filed by ADR Provider Mike Loftin . Attorneys in attendance Donald Edward Cummings, S Tom Morris, Selena N Solis. Prv Fee: $1200.00 Disposition: DNS (2) (jeh) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

March 15, 2002

March 15, 2002

29

Letter from defendant - confirming that this case is settled and a consent decree will be presented for entry as soon as signatures of all counsel can be obtained (1) (djs) (Entered: 06/21/2002)

June 21, 2002

June 21, 2002

30

ORDER - The Court having been informed that the above-styled case has settled, all pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk will terminate all pending motions. The parties are to tender an agreed order of dismissal within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge Mary L. Robinson) Copies to counsel: 6/24/02 Page(s) 1 (jeh) (Entered: 06/24/2002)

June 24, 2002

June 24, 2002

31

JOINT MOTION to Enter Consent Decree by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Excel Corporation, intervenor-plaintiff Francisco nmn Acosta, intervenor-plaintiff Sergio Castro, intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation (2) (jeh) (Entered: 06/26/2002)

June 25, 2002

June 25, 2002

32

CONSENT DECREEE for intervenor-plaintiffs Francisco Acosta and Sergio Castro against intervenor-defendant Excel Corporation. This Consent Decree resolves the allegations raised by the EEOC and the Intervenors in the above-captioned civil action. The Court retains jurisdiction of this action for a period of one year and may enter such other and further relief as it deems appropriate to ensure implementation and enforcement of the provisions of this Decree. Within 10 days after the date of this Decree, Deft Excel Corp, in settlement of this dispute, shall pay a total sum of $20,000.00 ($12,000.00 to Francisco Acosta and $8,000.00 to Sergio Castro). Such payments shall be made by separate checks and mailed to Donald E. Cummings, Esq., Lubbock, TX. The parties to this Decree shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees incurred in this action. (signed by Judge Mary Lou Robinson) Copies to counsel: 6/28/02 Page(s): 7 (jeh) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

June 28, 2002

June 28, 2002

Case closed (jeh) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

June 28, 2002

June 28, 2002

33

RELEASE by Francisco nmn Acosta (2) (plh) (Entered: 07/05/2002)

July 5, 2002

July 5, 2002

34

RELEASE by Sergio Castro (2) (plh) (Entered: 07/05/2002)

July 5, 2002

July 5, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 24, 2001

Closing Date: June 28, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Excel Corporation (Friona), Private Entity/Person

Excel Corporation, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 20000

Order Duration: 2002 - 2003

Content of Injunction:

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Issues

General:

Retaliation

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit