Filed Date: June 16, 1976
Clearinghouse coding complete
In 1976, inmates at the Stateville Correctional Center in Illinois filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against the Illinois Department of Corrections in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The inmates alleged that their constitutional rights had been violated by the defendants' failure to provide them adequate medical care.
According to the court in Pryor v. Twomey, No. 73 C 1358, 1988 WL 124360, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 14, 1988), in that case,
[T]he court convened a panel of experts to advise it; evidence was heard; and the court had under consideration a proposed decree submitted by plaintiffs' counsel. Meanwhile, another action was filed, Cook v. Rowe, 76 C 2224, which challenged the adequacy of dental/medical/dietetic care afforded residents of Stateville under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Settlement negotiations were immediately instituted in Cook v. Rowe culminating in the entry of a consent order on January 23, 1978 pursuant to which a panel of dental, medical and dietetic experts were appointed to monitor the consent order and recommend implementation thereof.(The Pryor v. Twomey judge further "concluded that the relief sought in this action has been subsumed by the relief granted in Cook v. Rowe. Accordingly, we have concluded that this action should be dismissed as moot. We are also of the view, however, that these plaintiffs and their counsel have obtained substantial relief through their efforts and the efforts of plaintiffs and counsel in Cook v. Rowe. Consequently plaintiffs in this action should be deemed prevailing parties under existing case law. Plaintiffs' counsel in this case are entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee under 42 U.S.C. § 1988."The panel in Cook v. Rowe diligently discharged its responsibilities to the end that there has been a comprehensive revision of the dental/medical/dietetic services provided to inmates at Stateville. The panel in Cook v. Rowe has advised the court that the protocols established under the decree are appropriate for the management and monitoring of patients with diabetes.
The panel in Cook v. Rowe has completed its work and has been discharged. The new dental/medical/dietetic program at Stateville is firmly in place.
According to a filing in Lightfoot v. Walker, 826 F.2d 516, 521 (7th Cir. 1987), the Cook v. Rowe settlement also included $77,210 in attorneys' fees paid to plaintiffs.
We don't know how long the Cook v. Rowe consent decree remained in effect. It did make occasional appearances in other case opinions/filings:
So presumably Cook v. Rowe is terminated -- but we don't really know.
Summary Authors
Kristen Sagar (3/16/2006)
Last updated March 30, 2024, 3:07 a.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: Illinois
Case Type(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: June 16, 1976
Case Ongoing: Perhaps, but long-dormant
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Inmates at the Stateville Correctional Center in Illinois
Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown
Filed Pro Se: Unknown
Class Action Sought: Unknown
Class Action Outcome: Unknown
Defendants
Illinios Department of Corrections, State
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Form of Settlement:
Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Amount Defendant Pays: 77000
Order Duration: 1978 - None
Issues
Medical/Mental Health:
Type of Facility: