Case: EEOC v. ATLANTA PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATES INC

1:02-cv-01469 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: May 30, 2002

Closed Date: March 26, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In May 2002, the EEOC district office in Atlanta, Georgia brought this action against Atlanta Protective Associates, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Although the complaint is not available, the docket indicates that there were allegations that the defendant violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating on the basis of sex. After the defendant filed its initial answer and its certificate of interested parties, the litigants settled and a consent decree was entered in March 2003. Although the consent decree is not available, the docket states that the parties agreed that the defendant would pay the aggrieved party $30,000, refrain from retaliating and discriminating on the basis of sex, provide its managers with EEO training, and post an EEO notice. No costs or fees were awarded.

Summary Authors

Jason Chester (7/20/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-01469

Docket

EEOC v. Atlanta Protective

March 26, 2003

March 26, 2003

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 27, 2024, 3:12 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand. (aet) (Entered: 06/03/2002)

May 30, 2002

May 30, 2002

CASE REFERRED to Mag Judge Linda T. Walker (Calendar sheets forwarded) (aet) (Entered: 06/03/2002)

May 30, 2002

May 30, 2002

2

Attorney appearance for plaintiffby Cynthia Leigh Montgomery (ck) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

July 30, 2002

July 30, 2002

3

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Atlanta Protective mailed 6/18/02 Answer due by 8/17/02 for Atlanta Protective (ck) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

July 30, 2002

July 30, 2002

4

ANSWER by defendant to complaint [1-1] Discovery ends 12/27/02 (ck) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

July 30, 2002

July 30, 2002

Proposed Consent Order extending time thru 8/16/02 fo rparties to meet and file the prel planning report and for dft to file the certificate of interested persons. (to LTW) (fmm) (Entered: 08/22/2002)

Aug. 21, 2002

Aug. 21, 2002

5

CONSENT ORDER by Mag Judge Linda T. Walker, extending time thr 9/16/02 for parties to meet and file a prel planning report and for dft to file its certificate of interested persons (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 08/27/2002)

Aug. 23, 2002

Aug. 23, 2002

6

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by defendant (cdg) (Entered: 08/30/2002)

Aug. 29, 2002

Aug. 29, 2002

7

Preliminary Report and Discovery Schedule. (to mag) (cdg) Modified on 09/17/2002 (Entered: 09/17/2002)

Sept. 16, 2002

Sept. 16, 2002

8

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by plaintiff (cdg) (Entered: 10/03/2002)

Oct. 2, 2002

Oct. 2, 2002

9

ORDER by Mag Judge Linda T. Walker, DIRECTING dft to file a separate Certificate of Interested Persons within 15 days; [9-1] order to be submitted on 10/23/02 (cc by mag) (ck) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

Oct. 3, 2002

Oct. 3, 2002

10

SCHEDULING ORDER by Mag Judge Linda T. Walker APPROVING [7-1] preliminary statement, Discovery ends 12/27/02 , motions for sum jgm due 1/17/03, if no motion filed then pre-trial order due on 1/28/03 , [10-2] order to be submitted on 1/31/03 if no motion or pto filed (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 8, 2002

Oct. 8, 2002

11

GUIDELINES FOR DISCOVERY AND MOTION PRACTICE by Mag Judge Linda T. Walker (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 8, 2002

Oct. 8, 2002

12

NOTICE TO PARTIES re: sum jgm motions by Mag Judge Linda T. Walker (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 8, 2002

Oct. 8, 2002

13

Dft's Certificate of interested persons. (to judge and mag) (cdg) (Entered: 10/10/2002)

Oct. 9, 2002

Oct. 9, 2002

14

Notice of withdrawal of counsel Cynthia L. Montgomery by plaintiff. (cdg) (Entered: 10/16/2002)

Oct. 15, 2002

Oct. 15, 2002

15

Joint MOTION to extend time thru 2/10/03 discovery , with proposed order. (to LTW) (ck) (Entered: 11/27/2002)

Nov. 26, 2002

Nov. 26, 2002

16

CONSENT ORDER by Mag Judge Linda T. Walker GRANTING [15-1] joint motion to extend time thru 2/10/03 discovery, Discovery ends 2/10/03 (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 12/05/2002)

Dec. 4, 2002

Dec. 4, 2002

17

Attorney appearance for plaintiff by Marcus G. Keegan (fmm) (Entered: 01/14/2003)

Jan. 13, 2003

Jan. 13, 2003

18

AMENDED ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by plaintiff (fmm) (Entered: 01/14/2003)

Jan. 13, 2003

Jan. 13, 2003

19

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Orinda D. Evans, in order to facilitate settlement, dft agress that it shall not discriminate against nor retaliate against any employee or affected group member on the basis of sex, dft shall keep posted the notice required pursuant to Section 711 of Title VII, dft shall provide the proper training to management, dft shall provide to Begay Jallow the sum of $30,000.00 in settlement of all alleged claims and all parties shall bear their own respective costs and atty fees. Further, clerk is DIRECTED to administratively terminate the action (cc) (fmm) (Entered: 03/26/2003)

March 26, 2003

March 26, 2003

Completed referral to Mag Judge Linda T. Walker (fmm) (Entered: 03/26/2003)

March 26, 2003

March 26, 2003

Case terminated. (fmm) (Entered: 03/26/2003)

March 26, 2003

March 26, 2003

Case Details

State / Territory: Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 30, 2002

Closing Date: March 26, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Atlanta Protective Associates, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 30000

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits