University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. SAN ANTONIO SHOE, INC. EE-TX-0316
Docket / Court 2:99-cv-00011-OLG ( W.D. Tex. )
State/Territory Texas
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The EEOC's San Antonio district office sued San Antonio Shoe, Inc., on March 5, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The EEOC's cause of action is based on the defendant's violation of Title VII by discriminating based on sex (female). The defendant filed a motion ... read more >
The EEOC's San Antonio district office sued San Antonio Shoe, Inc., on March 5, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The EEOC's cause of action is based on the defendant's violation of Title VII by discriminating based on sex (female). The defendant filed a motion for partial summary judgment in January 2000 which was denied in September 2000. The parties entered into a settlement agreement on October 25, 2000, the contents of which are unknown.

Aaron Weismann - 07/23/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Discrimination-area
Harassment / Hostile Work Environment
Discrimination-basis
Sex discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) San Antonio Shoe, Inc.
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Unknown
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Voluntary Dismissal
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year 2000
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:99-cv-00011-OLG (W.D. Tex.) 12/05/2000
EE-TX-0316-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Order [Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and to Quash] 02/04/2000 (W.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0316-0004 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [re: motion to quash and motion to compel] 03/29/2000 (W.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0316-0001 PDF | Detail
United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 05/12/2000 (W.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0316-0002 PDF | Detail
Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and Denying Summary Judgment 09/25/2000 (W.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0316-0003 PDF | Detail
Agreed Order of Dismissal 10/30/2000 (W.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0316-0005 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Edwards, Durwood (W.D. Tex.) [Magistrate]
EE-TX-0316-0002 | EE-TX-0316-0004
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -