Case: EEOC v. Laughlin Associates, Inc.

3:98-cv-00500 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada

Filed Date: Sept. 4, 1998

Closed Date: 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Los Angeles district office of the EEOC brought this suit against Laughlin Associates, Inc. in September 1998 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. The docket suggests that the case was brought under Title VII. The complainant sought to intervene in March 1999 but her motion was denied two months later. After some discovery and disputes over a proposed proactive order, a stipulated settlement was entered in September of 1999. After complainant's motion to intervene was denied, she gave notice of appeal in June of 1999, and her appeal was dismissed in December of 1999 as not complying with the Ninth Circuit's rules.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (5/23/2008)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

	Document
3:98-cv-00500	Docket [Index Case Search] EEOC v. LAUGHLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.	Feb. 8, 2000	Feb. 8, 2000 Docket

show / hide documents

Resources

Title	Description		External URL Date / External URL
Under the Radar: Visibility and the Effects of Discrimination Lawsuits in Small and Large Firms Carly Knight, Frank Dobbin, Alexandra Kalev	Research on how discrimination lawsuits affect corporate diversity has yielded mixed results. Qualitative studies highlight the limited efficacy of lawsuits in the typical workplace, finding that lit…	April 1, 2022	April 1, 2022 https://cris.tau.ac.il/...

show / hide resources

Docket

Last updated March 24, 2024, 3:04 a.m.

ECF Number	Description	Date	Link Date / Link
	SUB to RAM: Ord of mandate. wj (AT)	Dec. 20, 1999	Dec. 20, 1999
40	ORDER ON MANDATE (RAM) ORD that the mandate be spread upon the records of this Court. (C/A 99-16617). cps dist wj (AT)	Jan. 7, 2000	Jan. 7, 2000
41	NOTICE/HEARING OSC fm USDC re ENE: (LSW:lg) to Cnsl: Hearne, Thomason, Fielder and Malloy. ose hrng set 3/30/00 @9am bef USMJ PHA; Show cause hrng will be vac upon glf of properly complted survey w/in 10 days fm dt of ths ntc. cps dist wj (AT) mId 2/28/00	Feb. 8, 2000	Feb. 8, 2000
	EMPLOYEMNT COMMISSION LAUGHLIN ASSOC, et al I PAGE '5 ___ OF ___ PAG ES
	nan
	PROCEEDINGS =~=f--T---
38	! JUDGMENT (LSW:wj) ORD & ADJDGD that this case has been finally settled and that
	I all claims alleged in this action by P agnst D may be dism with prej, both I prts to bear their own atty fees and costs, w/i any award or fees or costs . to either party, and that the Court may inter its order consistent with I this stip. EOD 9/13/99 cps dist wj (AT) I JS-6 (AT) wj
39	ORDER (CC) re CIA 99-16617 (CAC:ot) ORD a reivew of the file in ths case reveals that the appellant has failed to perfect the appeal as prescribed by the Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure. Purs to 9th Cir Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the rules requiring processing the appeal to hearing. A certified cpy of this ord sent to the district court, agency or Tax Court sh act as and for the mandate of this court. cps dist wj (AT)
	nan