Case: EEOC v. InteliData Technologies, Corp.

1:04-cv-01149 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Sept. 29, 2004

Closed Date: May 19, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

EEOC's Richmond, VA office filed this Title VII sexual discrimination lawsuit against the defendant, Intelidata Technologies, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria) on 09/29/2004. The defendant is a Reston, VA-based provider of online banking software. The company's president/CEO regularly made inappropriate and offensive comments after learning that a female regional sales manager was pregnant. The female manager did not intervene in the lawsuit or file a separate lawsuit.

Before filing an answer to the complaint,the defendant filed a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment. The district court judge Claude M. Hilton denied the motion. The parties settled two months later and a consent decree was entered on 05/19/2005.

Under the consent decree, the defendant agreed to pay the female manager $59,000. The defendant was also prohibited from sex discrimination in the future.

Summary Authors

Yin Zheng (7/6/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:04-cv-01149

Docket

EEOC v. Intelidata Technologies, Corp.

May 19, 2005

May 19, 2005

Docket

1:04-cv-01149

EEOC Annual Report

EEOC v. Intelidata Technologies Corp

No Court

Sept. 30, 2005

Sept. 30, 2005

Press Release

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 26, 2024, 3:04 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; jury demand (otho) Modified on 10/02/2004 (Entered: 09/29/2004)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

CASE REFERRED to Mag Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr. (otho) (Entered: 09/29/2004)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

Jury Trial Flag (otho) (Entered: 09/29/2004)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

SUMMONS(ES) issued and sent to atty for service by SPS as to Intelidata (otho) (Entered: 09/29/2004)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

2

Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Intelidata (kjon) (Entered: 02/02/2005)

Feb. 2, 2005

Feb. 2, 2005

4

BRIEF by Intelidata in support of [3-1] motion by Intelidata to Dismiss with prejudice or [3-2] motion by Intelidata for Summary Judgment (kjon) (Entered: 02/02/2005)

Feb. 2, 2005

Feb. 2, 2005

5

NOTICE of Hearing: Motion Hearing Deadline before Judge Claude M. Hilton set for 10:00 3/4/05 for [3-1] motion by Intelidata to Dismiss with prejudice, set for 10:00 3/4/05 for [3-2] motion by Intelidata for Summary Judgment (kjon) (Entered: 02/02/2005)

Feb. 2, 2005

Feb. 2, 2005

6

SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Intelidata 1/13/05 Answer due on 2/2/05 for Intelidata (pmil) (Entered: 02/04/2005)

Feb. 3, 2005

Feb. 3, 2005

7

BRIEF by Equal Employment in opposition to [3-1] motion by Intelidata to Dismiss with prejudice or [3-2] motion by Intelidata for Summary Judgment (kjon) (Entered: 02/16/2005)

Feb. 16, 2005

Feb. 16, 2005

8

REPLY MEMORANDUM in support by Intelidata of [3-2] motion by Intelidata for Summary Judgment (clar) (Entered: 02/25/2005)

Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

Per CMH chambers motions set for 3/4/05 on papers (clar) (Entered: 03/03/2005)

March 3, 2005

March 3, 2005

9

ORDER setting Initial Pretrial Conference for 10:00 3/23/05 Discovery Deadline for 7/15/05 Final Pretrial Conference for 10:00 7/21/05 (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton ) Copies Mailed: Yes (kjon) (Entered: 03/04/2005)

March 3, 2005

March 3, 2005

Deadline updated; reset Initial Pretrial Conference for 10:00 3/23/05 before Mag Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr. (kjon) (Entered: 03/04/2005)

March 3, 2005

March 3, 2005

10

ORDER that [3-1] motion by Intelidata to Dismiss with prejudice and [3-2] motion by Intelidata for Summary Judgment are DENIED (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Claude M. Hilton ) Copies Mailed: Yes [EOD Date: 3/7/05] (kjon) (Entered: 03/07/2005)

March 4, 2005

March 4, 2005

11

ANSWER AND DEFENSES to Complaint by Intelidata (Attorney Elizabeth A. Lalik),; jury demand (kjon) (Entered: 03/18/2005)

March 18, 2005

March 18, 2005

12

Report of parties' planning meeting by Equal Employment, Intelidata (pmet) (Entered: 03/18/2005)

March 18, 2005

March 18, 2005

13

Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(B) Conference it is hereby ordered that: a) The Rule 26(f) report filed by the parties is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless modified by the court. b) Copies of all non-dispositive motions and all paper relating to such motions shall be delivered directly to the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge when the originals are filed with the clerk. c) Depositions of former employees who were FLSA exempt will be considered "employee" depositions for purposes of counting the number of "non-employee" depositions (see order for details) ( signed by Mag Judge Thomas R. Jones Jr. ) Mailed: Yes (kjon) (Entered: 03/24/2005)

March 23, 2005

March 23, 2005

***Civil Case Terminated. (kjon, ) (Entered: 05/23/2005)

May 19, 2005

May 19, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: Virginia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 29, 2004

Closing Date: May 19, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Intelidata Technologies, Corp., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 59000

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Pregnancy discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits