University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Inmates of Occoquan v. Barry PC-DC-0003
Docket / Court 86-2128 ( D.D.C. )
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) Prison Conditions
Attorney Organization ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU National Prison Project
Case Summary
Represented by ACLU National Prison Project attorneys and private counsel, on August 4, 1986, prisoners confined at the Occoquan Facilities of the District of Columbia's Lorton Correctional Complex filed a class action proceeding under 42 U.S.C §1983 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. ... read more >
Represented by ACLU National Prison Project attorneys and private counsel, on August 4, 1986, prisoners confined at the Occoquan Facilities of the District of Columbia's Lorton Correctional Complex filed a class action proceeding under 42 U.S.C §1983 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. They named as defendants District of Columbia government officials responsible for these medium security facilities and asserted that their Fifth and Eighth Amendment rights were being violated by reason of an excessive inmate population and by deficiencies in environmental health and safety, food services, fire safety, medical and dental care, and mental health services. On August 13, 1986, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Judge June L. Green) certified a plaintiff class that included present and future persons confined to the Occoquan Facilities.

Following trial and post-trial briefing, Judge Green awarded judgment in plaintiffs' favor on December 22, 1986. Inmates of Occuquan v. Barry, 650 F.Supp. 619 (D.D.C. 1986). Judge Green found that the numerous deficiencies alleged by the plaintiffs were proven to be systemic in nature and, together with chronic overcrowding, combined to subject plaintiffs to cruel and unusual punishment. To remedy this Eighth Amendment violation, the judge first imposed inmate population limits, both for the individual dormitories comprising the three Occuquan Facilities and for the institution, cumulatively. Her opinion also required the defendants to provide the Court with written reports. The reports were to address (1) planned compliance with the population caps and, (2) every thirty days, the steps being taken to address the institution's many deficiencies. In evaluating the evidence before her, Judge Green frequently referred to standards established by professional correctional, health, and safety associations. Her opinion concluded by encouraging the defendants to adopt a goal of compliance with these professional standards. The defendants appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

On April 12, 1988, that appellate court, in a 2-1 decision (with its opinion written by Judge Kenneth Starr), vacated the District Court's ruling and remanded the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. Inmates of Occuquan v. Barry, 844 F.2d 828 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Judge Starr wrote that the lower court's repeated reliance on professional agencies' standards erroneously failed to focus on whether prison deficiencies equated to deprivations of "minimal civilized measure of life's necessities." Additionally, the appellate majority ruled that the district court exceeded its equitable powers by imposing population caps without first seeking to specifically correct deficiencies that the court had identified as constitutional violations. District Judge Harold H. Greene, sitting by designation on the appellate panel, filed a dissent.

The plaintiffs sought a rehearing of the panel's ruling by the entire District Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals, but this en banc review request was denied on July 8, 1988. Inmates of Occuquan v. Barry, 850 F.2d 796 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Circuit Judge Starr filed an opinion concurring in the denial, and separate dissenting opinions were filed by Circuit Judges Pamela Wald and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Upon remand, the District Court (Judge Green) conducted a trial. Afterward, on June 30, 1989, she ruled that Eighth Amendment violations had been proven as to matters of sanitation, bathroom facilities, fire safety, health care, and staffing. Constitutional violations had not been proven regarding food services, inmate jobs, educational and drug programming, library facilities, and general idleness. Inmates of Occuquan v. Barry, 717 F. Supp. 854, 865-868 (D.D.C. 1989). The judge required the defendants to file a written report of how they anticipated correcting the constitutional violations. Additionally, Judge Green ordered the defendants not to cause the institution's population to exceed the level as of the date of her decision, in that then-planned renovations of certain dorms otherwise could cause population stress as inmates were shifted among available facilities.

Over the next decade, in most years the case generated occasional proposals, motions, and agreed-upon and supplemental plans, as well as consent orders and other orders addressing institutional conditions. These documents can be found at PC-DC-3, documents 2 through 21. The 119-page court docket reflects that Special Officers of the Court were appointed during the litigation, including Grace M. Lopes and Karen M. Schneider, to act as Masters aiding the court.

Included among the post-trial documents is a December 18, 1989, agreed plan by the parties to address deficiencies in hygiene, sanitation, ventilation, asbestos presence, fire safety, health care, mental health services, and physical safety. The plan was approved by Judge Green on December 21, 1989, as partial remediation. A supplemental agreed plan filed by the parties on January 26, 1990, addressed environmental health issues (lighting and airborne disease risks), fire safety and health care staffing. It, too, was approved by Judge Green as partial remediation, but her February 7, 1990, order added that monetary penalties would be imposed upon the defendants if they excessively delayed their compliance.

During 1993 and 1994, the parties' counsel met with Special Master Grace Lopes and agreed, in filings of August 1, 1993, and April 8 and December 14, 1994, that monthly reports would be filed with the Special Master describing the mental health care provided at the Occoquan Facilities.

The defendants' progress in complying with remedial directives lagged, which led in 1995 to plaintiffs' filing a contempt motion and a resultant supplemental plan agreed upon by the parties and made effective via a December 15, 1995, consent order. In the order, Judge Green imposed required correctional officer staffing levels, dormitory population limits, required a security audit, made provision for improving protected inmate separation from disciplined inmates, and addressed mental health issues. She directed development of an institutional mental health care plan, set a minimum level of psychologist staffing, ordered improved tracking and recall of inmates receiving psychological services, and called for medical record consolidation and mental health screenings of all inmates. Bimonthly compliance reports were required by the order, which also set a contempt fine schedule for instances of non-compliance and provided for defendants' payment of plaintiffs' attorney fees, as well as expert and monitoring expenses, resulting from prosecuting contempt or related proceedings resulting from defendants' non-compliance.

On July 23, 1996, a consent order similarly provided that defendants pay such fees and expenses relating to non-compliance; however, this order largely dealt with environmental health and fire safety issues. It directed plumbing repairs, water temperature improvements, a preventive maintenance plan, ventilation repairs, carbon dioxide monitoring, window/screen and kitchen equipment repairs, housekeeping and vermin control plans, mattress sanitization and fireproofing, availability of cleaning supplies, correctional officer training, kitchen wall cleaning, and food temperature improvements, and set required distances between inmates' beds to limit air borne disease transmission. Judge Green also allowed for plaintiffs' compliance inspection of facilities, with 24-hour prior notice. Her fire safety directives included smoke detector, alarm, dryer vent and lighting repairs, certain structural improvements, an operational fire alarm system, and fire drills and evacuation plans. Bi-monthly reporting of compliance progress was also required.

Two notable orders were entered with the parties' consent in 1997. Judge Green, on February 5, 1997, directed defendants to hire a system-wide medical coordinator with powers to enable compliance with the court's health-related orders. The judge's November 20, 1997, order authorized the Special Master to form and retain an expert team at defendants' expense. The team would review and make recommendations on matters of security, workforce utilization, classification and safety, and maintenance and sanitation. This latter order set a date for opening a new adjustment unit to house prisoners on administrative and disciplinary segregation.

The following year, on January 20, 1998, a three judge panel of the District Court, including Judge Green, convened and granted a consent order adopting a population ceiling and related procedures for the institution. (The three-judge panel was a requirement for entry of such a ceiling, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.) Judge Green then, on February 5, 1998, amended her prior orders, upon the joint motion of the parties, to allow for a substituted correctional officer deployment plan and modification of ceiling numbers earlier set for beds per certain dorms. Continued use of a Special Master and the team of experts, at defendants' expense, was approved in order to provide management assistance, staffing and prisoner population limits, classification and maintenance aid, and to develop initiatives to limit prisoner idleness.

Proceedings in the case continued well into 2003, with responsibility for rulings by then having been accepted by District Judge William B. Bryant. Throughout, occasional disbursements were made for Special Masters' and expert consultants' expenses and fees. These payments came from funds the defendants were periodically ordered to deposit into the court registry. In addition to these expenses, on one occasion a $40,000 payment from these defense-provided funds was directed by Judge Bryant to the Georgetown University Law Center for the operating expenses of the D.C. Family Literacy and Street Law programs. During this period, consent orders modifying prior orders relating to staffing, population, and institutional conditions were irregularly issued. The final docket entry presently in this database reflects receipt by the court of another deposit of funds by the defendants to the court's account.

Additionally, the court's docket reflect a relationship between this case and two other prison condition cases challenging conditions at other components of the Lorton Correctional Complex. Also filed in the D.C. District Court (docket numbers 79-1726 and 80-2136), these cases, John Doe v. District of Columbia and Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, are designated PC-DC-0007 and PC-DC-0008, respectively, in the Clearinghouse.

Mike Fagan - 04/09/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Crowding
Post-PLRA Population Cap
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action None on record
Defendant(s) Department of Corrections Occoquan Facilities I, II, III
District of Columbia
Plaintiff Description All persons who are under the control of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections and who are confined at Occoquan or who may be so confined in the future
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU National Prison Project
Class action status sought None on record
Class action status granted Unknown
Prevailing Party Unknown
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Unknown
Source of Relief Unknown
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Unknown
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Civil Rights Injunctions Over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders
N.Y.U. Law Review
By: Margo Schlanger (Washington University)
Citation: 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons
By: Malcolm M. Feeley & Edward Rubin (UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law & Vanderbilt School of Law Faculty)
Citation: (1998)
[ Detail ]

Docket(s)
86-2128 (D.D.C.) 09/16/2005
PC-DC-0003-9000.pdf | Detail
General Documents
Complaint 08/04/1986
PC-DC-0003-0001.pdf | Detail
Order 12/22/1986 (650 F.Supp. 619) (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0023.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Order 05/20/1987 (1987 WL 11422) (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0028.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Memorandum 06/29/1987 (1987 WL 13349) (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0029.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Opinion 04/12/1988 (844 F.2d 828)
PC-DC-0003-0025.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Order 07/08/1988 (850 F.2d 796)
PC-DC-0003-0026.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Opinion 06/30/1989 (717 F.Supp. 854) (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0027.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Proposed Plan for Implementation of the Court's June 30, 1989 Order 12/14/1989
PC-DC-0003-0003.pdf | Detail
Parties' Agreed Plan for Implementation of the Court's June 30, 1989 Order 12/18/1989
PC-DC-0003-0004.pdf | Detail
Order 12/21/1989 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0005.pdf | Detail
Parties' Supplemental Agreed Plan for Implementation of the Court's June 30, 1989 Order 01/26/1990
PC-DC-0003-0006.pdf | Detail
Order 02/07/1990 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0007.pdf | Detail
Stipulation on Mental Health Compliance 08/01/1993
PC-DC-0003-0008.pdf | Detail
Stipulation on Mental Health Compliance 04/08/1994
PC-DC-0003-0009.pdf | Detail
Second Stipulation on Mental Health Compliance 12/14/1994
PC-DC-0003-0010.pdf | Detail
Second Supplemental Agreed Plan and consent Order 12/15/1995
PC-DC-0003-0011.pdf | Detail
Environment Health and Fire Safety Consent Order 07/23/1996 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0012.pdf | Detail
Consent Motion for the adoption of a Consent Order concerning systemwide medical and mental health care 07/26/1996
PC-DC-0003-0013.pdf | Detail
Consent Order 07/26/1996 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0014.pdf | Detail
Consent Order 11/20/1997 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0017.pdf | Detail
Consent Motion to Convene Three-Judge Court 11/20/1997 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0021.pdf | Detail
Population Consent Order 01/20/1998 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0018.pdf | Detail
Consent Motion to Substitute the Attached Correctional Officer Deployment Plan and Ceiling for the Number of Beds Allowed in the Larger Dorms 02/02/1998 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0022.pdf | Detail
Order 02/05/1998 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0019.pdf | Detail
Consent Motion to Enter Proposed Order 04/03/1998 (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0020.pdf | Detail
Judges Buckley, James Lane (D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Edwards, Harry Thomas (D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Ginsburg, Douglas Howard (D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (D.C. Circuit, SCOTUS)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Green, June Lazenby (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0007 | PC-DC-0003-0011 | PC-DC-0003-0012 | PC-DC-0003-0013 | PC-DC-0003-0014 | PC-DC-0003-0017 | PC-DC-0003-0018 | PC-DC-0003-0019 | PC-DC-0003-0023 | PC-DC-0003-0027 | PC-DC-0003-0028 | PC-DC-0003-0029 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Greene, Harold H. (D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0025
Mikva, Abner Joseph (D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Robinson, Spottswood William III (D.C. Circuit, D.D.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Sentelle, David Bryan (D.C. Circuit, W.D.N.C.)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Silberman, Laurence Hirsch (FISCR, D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-0026
Starr, Kenneth Winston (D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-0026
Wald, Patricia McGowan (D.C. Circuit)
PC-DC-0003-0026
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Adams, Stuart H. Jr. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0003 | PC-DC-0003-0004 | PC-DC-0003-0006 | PC-DC-0003-0008 | PC-DC-0003-0009 | PC-DC-0003-0011 | PC-DC-0003-0012 | PC-DC-0003-0027
Aiyetoro, Adjoa A. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0003 | PC-DC-0003-0004 | PC-DC-0003-0005 | PC-DC-0003-0006 | PC-DC-0003-0027 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Alexander, Elizabeth R. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0012 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Bronstein, Alvin J. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0023 | PC-DC-0003-0025
Freeman, Alexa P. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0001 | PC-DC-0003-0023 | PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Khan, Ayesha N. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0011 | PC-DC-0003-0017 | PC-DC-0003-0018 | PC-DC-0003-0019 | PC-DC-0003-0020 | PC-DC-0003-0021 | PC-DC-0003-0022 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Koren, Edward I. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0001 | PC-DC-0003-0003 | PC-DC-0003-0004 | PC-DC-0003-0006 | PC-DC-0003-0023 | PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-0027 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Krakoff, Jere (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0025
Labson, Michael S. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0013
Lasker, Eric G. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0013
Ney, Steven (Maryland)
PC-DC-0003-0001 | PC-DC-0003-0023 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Nickles, Peter J. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0013 | PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Pemberton, Alan A. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0013 | PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Seymour, John F. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0025
Defendant's Lawyers Amato, Maria-Claudia T. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0011 | PC-DC-0003-0012 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Cooke, Frederick D. Jr. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0025 | PC-DC-0003-0027
Earle, William J. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0012 | PC-DC-0003-0017 | PC-DC-0003-0018 | PC-DC-0003-0021 | PC-DC-0003-0022
Ferren, John M. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0017 | PC-DC-0003-0018 | PC-DC-0003-0020 | PC-DC-0003-0021 | PC-DC-0003-0022
Grossman, Martin L. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0022 | PC-DC-0003-0027
King, Metcalfe C. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0023
Love, Richard Stuart (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0004 | PC-DC-0003-0005 | PC-DC-0003-0006 | PC-DC-0003-0008 | PC-DC-0003-0009 | PC-DC-0003-0010 | PC-DC-0003-0011 | PC-DC-0003-0017 | PC-DC-0003-0018 | PC-DC-0003-0019 | PC-DC-0003-0020 | PC-DC-0003-0021 | PC-DC-0003-0022 | PC-DC-0003-9000
McPherson, Lawrence G. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0008 | PC-DC-0003-0009 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Quander, Paul A. Jr. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0022 | PC-DC-0003-0027 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Reid, Herbert O. Sr. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0004 | PC-DC-0003-0006
Reischel, Charles L. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0025
Ruff, Charles F.C. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0012
Schwab, Edward E. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0025
Valentine, George C. (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0022
Zielinski, Michael Edward (District of Columbia)
PC-DC-0003-0004 | PC-DC-0003-0006 | PC-DC-0003-0012 | PC-DC-0003-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -