Case: EEOC v. NETWORK EQUIPMENT

1:04-cv-01156 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closed Date: May 19, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2004, the Richmond office of the EEOC brought this suit against Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The case settled, and the parties dismissed the case in May 2005. Because the docket is the only accessible document, no information on the nature of the suit or the consent decree is available.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/19/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:04-cv-01156

Docket

EEOC v. Network Equipment et al

May 19, 2005

May 19, 2005

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 17, 2024, 3:14 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; jury demand (otho) (Entered: 09/30/2004)

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

CASE REFERRED to Mag Judge Theresa C. Buchanan (otho) (Entered: 09/30/2004)

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

Jury Trial Flag (otho) (Entered: 09/30/2004)

Sept. 30, 2004

Sept. 30, 2004

2

Summons returned unexecuted as to Network Technologies (klau) Modified on 01/24/2005 (Entered: 01/24/2005)

Jan. 21, 2005

Jan. 21, 2005

3

AMENDED COMPLAINT by Equal Employment against Network Equipment; amending [1-1] complaint; jury demand (klau) (Entered: 01/24/2005)

Jan. 21, 2005

Jan. 21, 2005

SUMMONS(ES) issued and mailed to attorney for service by SPS as to Amended Complaint for Network Equipment (klau) (Entered: 01/24/2005)

Jan. 24, 2005

Jan. 24, 2005

4

SUMMONS Returned Executed for Amended Complaint as to Network Equipment 1/28/05 Answer due on 2/17/05 for Network Equipment (klau) Modified on 02/03/2005 (Entered: 02/03/2005)

Feb. 3, 2005

Feb. 3, 2005

5

Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Network Equipment (klau) (Entered: 02/17/2005)

Feb. 17, 2005

Feb. 17, 2005

6

ANSWER by Network Equipment (Attorney Kenneth M. Willner) to amended complaint; jury demand (klau) (Entered: 02/17/2005)

Feb. 17, 2005

Feb. 17, 2005

7

ORDER setting Initial Pretrial Conference for 10:00 3/16/05 Discovery Deadline for 5/13/05 Final Pretrial Conference for 10:00 5/19/05 (see order for details) ( signed by Judge Gerald Bruce Lee ) Copies Mailed: 2.28.05 (agil) (Entered: 02/28/2005)

Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

Deadline updated; set Initial Pretrial Conference for 10:00 3/16/05 before Mag Judge Theresa C. Buchanan (agil) (Entered: 02/28/2005)

Feb. 28, 2005

Feb. 28, 2005

8

PROPOSED joint Discovery Plan by Equal Employment, Network Equipment (mcke) (Entered: 03/14/2005)

March 11, 2005

March 11, 2005

9

ORDER, for Jennifer Levy Rappaport to appear pro hac vice Filing Fee Paid $ 50.00 Receipt # 100 178961 ( signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: Yes [EOD Date: 3/15/05] (kjon) (Entered: 03/15/2005)

March 14, 2005

March 14, 2005

10

Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(B) Conference it is hereby ordered that: a. The Proposed Joint Discovery Plan is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless modified by the Court - - - (see order for details) ( signed by Mag Judge Theresa C. Buchanan ) Mailed: y (klau) (Entered: 03/16/2005)

March 16, 2005

March 16, 2005

11

STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Network Equipment Technologies, Inc. (agil) (Entered: 05/13/2005)

May 12, 2005

May 12, 2005

12

ORDER that all claims brought by the Pltf are dismissed with prejudice, the issues of costs ant atty's fees having been resolved by the parties. Signed by Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 5/19/2005. (agil) (Entered: 05/20/2005)

May 19, 2005

May 19, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: Virginia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 30, 2004

Closing Date: May 19, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Network Equipment Technologies, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Network Technologies, Inc. , Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits