Case: EEOC v. Jefferson Pain and Rehabilitation Center

2:03-cv-01329 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Sept. 9, 2003

Closed Date: March 11, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2003, the Philadelphia District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Jefferson Pain and Rehabilitation Center in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The only document publicly available regarding this case is the docket; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. After a couple of scheduling orders and a case management conference, the parties settled through a consent decree in March 2004. According to the docket, the decree required the defendant to pay $45,000 to a female charging party.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (6/19/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:03-cv-01329

Docket [PACER]

March 11, 2004

March 11, 2004

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated Jan. 27, 2024, 3:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT with summons issued; jury demand (tt) (Entered: 09/09/2003)

Sept. 9, 2003

Sept. 9, 2003

2

ORDER, Case reassigned to Judge Thomas M. Hardiman . ( signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/7/03 ) CM all parties of record. (tt) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

Nov. 7, 2003

Nov. 7, 2003

3

ANSWER to Complaint by JEFFERSON PAIN (Attorney Jeffrey R. Gordon, Craig M. Brooks) (tt) (Entered: 11/19/2003)

Nov. 19, 2003

Nov. 19, 2003

4

ORDER, set Case Management Conference for 11:30 12/22/03 . Parties to submit proposed discovery plan by 12/16/03. ( signed by Judge Thomas M. Hardiman on 11/20/03 ) CM all parties of record. (tt) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

Nov. 20, 2003

Nov. 20, 2003

5

Case Management Conference reset for 11:30 1/20/04 (tt) (Entered: 12/10/2003)

Dec. 10, 2003

Dec. 10, 2003

7

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for EQUAL EMPLOYMENT by M. Jean Clickner (tt) (Entered: 01/12/2004)

Jan. 12, 2004

Jan. 12, 2004

8

JOINT MOTION by JEFFERSON PAIN, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT to Extend Discovery Deadlines , with Proposed Order. (tt) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

Jan. 15, 2004

Jan. 15, 2004

ORDER upon motion granting [8-1] joint motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. The deadline for submission of initial requests for the production of documents and interrogatories on be extended by 14 days to 1/30/04 ; set Response to Request for Production of Documents deadline to 3/1/04 ; set Answers to Interrogatories deadline to 3/1/04 . ( signed by Judge Thomas M. Hardiman on 1/16/04 ) CM all parties of record. (tt) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

Jan. 16, 2004

Jan. 16, 2004

9

Case Management Conference held 1/20/04 before Judge Thomas M. Hardiman [ Reporter: none ] (tt) (Entered: 01/20/2004)

Jan. 20, 2004

Jan. 20, 2004

10

CONSENT DECREE by EQUAL EMPLOYMENT, JEFFERSON PAIN with proposed order. (tt) (Entered: 03/10/2004)

March 10, 2004

March 10, 2004

ORDER upon consent Approving [10-1] Consent Decree. Defts and its officers, agents, management (including supervisory employees), successors and assigns, and all those in active concert or participation with them such as but not limited to employment agencies, or any of them, are hereby enjoined from violating provisions as stated more fully in said Consent Decree. Jefferson Pain & Rehabilitation Center shall pay $45,000.00 to Ms. DeShields. Of the amount paid to Ms. DeShields, $19,000.00 shall constitute back pay. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Decree. ( signed by Judge Thomas M. Hardiman on 3/11/04 ) CM all parties of record. (tt) (Entered: 03/12/2004)

March 11, 2004

March 11, 2004

Case closed. Notices mailed. (tt) (Entered: 03/12/2004)

March 11, 2004

March 11, 2004

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 9, 2003

Closing Date: March 11, 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Jefferson Pain and Rehabilitation Center, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits