Case: EEOC v. STAR STAINLESS SCREW COMPANY

1:00-cv-00758 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: March 24, 2000

Closed Date: March 31, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 2000, the Washington, D.C. (along with the Atlanta) office of the EEOC brought this class action suit against Star Stainless Screw Company in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The case settled by entry of a consent decree seven days later.

The consent decree required the defendant to refrain from discrimination, post notice, hold yearly training for managerial and supervisory employees, certify in writing to the EEOC that all management and supervisory personnel have been instructed as to the terms of the decree, report any complaint arising in the Norcross office to the EEOC, and pay a lump sum of $125,000 to affected class members. No other information was made available pertaining to the consent decree or the nature of the suit.

Summary Authors

Lionel Joiner (6/18/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:00-cv-00758

Docket (PACER)

Equal Employment v. Star Stainless Screw

March 31, 2000

March 31, 2000

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 27, 2024, 3:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT filed. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

2

ANSWERS TO MANDATORY DISCLOSURES by plaintiff (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

CASE REFERRED to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman (Calendar sheets forwarded) (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

3

Consent Decree by plaintiff and defendant, Disclaimer of Violation, it is understood and agreed that the negotiation, execution, and entry of this Consent Decree, and the understakings made by STAR hereunder, are in settlement and compromise of all alleged sex discrimination in employment, and retaliation, the validity of which is denied by STAR; Non-Discrimination, STAR agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or affected class member in any aspect of employment on the basis of their sex; Notice to be Posted, immediately upon entry of this Consent Decree and continuing until the expiration date specified in Section XII herein; Manager Training, STAR shall, at least one time per year for the term of this Agreement, hold a training session for STAR managers and other supervisory personnel employed at its Norcross, Georgia facility; Instruction to Management, within 30 days from the entry of this Decree, STAR shall certify in writing, to the EEOC that all management and supervisory personnel who are current employees of STAR have been instructed as to the terms of this Consent Decree; Reporting Requirement, for the duration of the term of this decree, STAR agrees that any complaint arising in STAR's Norcross, Georgia facility and brought to the attention of STAR management either in Norcross or in its home offices in Totowa, New Jersey, by any employee against any other employee or manager alleging sexual harassment issues which were addressed in these civil acitons resolved by this Consent Decree shall be reported to the Regional Attorney; Monetary Relief, STAR in settlement of alleged claims of financial loss due to alleged discriminatory employment practices, will pay the affected class members the total amount of $125,000.00; Disciplinary Policy on Sexual Harassment, STAR asserts that it has a sexual harassment policy that prohibits sexual harassment and provides for disciplinary action against violators; Procedure For Enforcing Compliance, the Commission will attempt to resolve any dispute regarding the enforcement of the Consent Decree by informal mediation and consultation; Other Actions, the Commission shall not commence or prosecute against STAR any action or other proceeding based upon any claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages or liabilities which arise out of EEOC Charge Numbers 110990335, 110990413, or the investigation of these charges or these lawsuits; Costs and Attorney Fees, The Commission and STAR shall each bear their own respective costs and attorney's fees for these actions. (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

4

Stipulation DISMISSING [1-1] complaint (to WBH) (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

SUBMITTED to Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. on [4-1] stipulation of dismissal, and [3-1] Consent Decree. (kt) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

March 27, 2000

March 27, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. GRANTING [4-1] stipulation of dismissal (cc) (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)

March 31, 2000

March 31, 2000

ENDORSED ORDER by Judge Willis B. Hunt Jr. APPROVING [3-1] Consent Decree by Star Stainless Screw, and Equal Employment (see Consent Decree for details) (cc) (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)

March 31, 2000

March 31, 2000

Case terminated. (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)

March 31, 2000

March 31, 2000

Completed referral to Mag Judge Joel M. Feldman (kt) (Entered: 03/31/2000)

March 31, 2000

March 31, 2000

Case Details

State / Territory: Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 24, 2000

Closing Date: March 31, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Stainless Screw Company (Norcross, GA), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 125000

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Reporting

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits