Case: EEOC v. SEAPAC, INC.

4:99-cv-04525 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas

Filed Date: Dec. 29, 1999

Closed Date: Jan. 8, 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In December 1999, the Houston District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Seapac, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. We do not have a copy of the complaint, but it appears from the final judgment that the complaint alleged discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After two settlement conferences and some discovery, the two parties settled the case in January 2001.

The agreed final judgment, containing non-discrimination and non-retaliation clauses, required the defendant to pay the charging party $10,000 and to designate an EEO Coordinator to investigate all internal EEO complaints. In addition, the defendant agreed to: establish a private phone line for receiving EEO complaints, notify employees of their rights, post a notice of rights, and provide annual Title VII training for its managers.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/6/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:99-cv-04525

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Seapac Inc.

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

Docket
18

4:99-cv-04525

Final Judgment

EEOC v. Seapac, Inc.

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 26, 2024, 3:11 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT by EEOC filed; (leddins) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

Dec. 29, 1999

Dec. 29, 1999

2

Order setting Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference on 4:45 5/12/00 before Judge Ewing Werlein Jr and Order to Disclose Interested Persons, filed. Party filing case notified. (leddins) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

Dec. 29, 1999

Dec. 29, 1999

1 SUMMONS issued for Seapac Inc (leddins) (Entered: 12/29/1999)

Dec. 29, 1999

Dec. 29, 1999

4

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Seapac Inc , filed. (hcarr) (Entered: 01/19/2000)

Jan. 19, 2000

Jan. 19, 2000

5

ANSWER to Complaint by Seapac Inc (Added attorney William L Davis), filed.; jury demand (hcarr) (Entered: 01/21/2000)

Jan. 21, 2000

Jan. 21, 2000

6

ORDER OF RESET: The scheduling conference has been reset for 2:45 6/23/00 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr , terminated deadlines , filed. (psmith) (Entered: 04/13/2000)

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

7

MOTION for settlement conference filed by Seapac Inc. Motion Docket Date 4/23/00 [7-1] motion . (fmremp) (Entered: 04/04/2000)

April 3, 2000

April 3, 2000

8

ORDER entered GRANTING [7-1] motion for settlement conference, Case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Frances Stacy to conduct a settlement conference referring case to Magistrate Judge Frances H. Stacy ; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr ) (leddins) (Entered: 04/06/2000)

April 5, 2000

April 5, 2000

9

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, set settlement conference for 1:00 on 5/2/00 before Magistrate Judge Frances H. Stacy , entered; Parties notified. (leddins) (Entered: 04/13/2000)

April 13, 2000

April 13, 2000

10

ORDER OF RESET; The scheduled settlement conference has been rescheduled, reset settlement conference for 10:00 5/30/00 before Magistrate Judge Frances H. Stacy , entered; Parties notified. (leddins) (Entered: 04/25/2000)

April 19, 2000

April 19, 2000

11

Minute entry of Settlement Conference held before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy on 5/30/00, filed: Appearances: William L Davis and Charles Farrell f/Deft; Nancy E Murphy f/Pltf; Settlement conference held; parties have until 6/12/00 to file status report as to this cause Ct Reporter: none (fmremp) (Entered: 05/31/2000)

May 30, 2000

May 30, 2000

12

JOINT DISCOVERY/Case Management Plan by EEOC and Seapac Inc filed. (fmremp) (Entered: 06/12/2000)

June 12, 2000

June 12, 2000

13

ORDER to reset scheduling conference for 2:45 8/4/00 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr , terminated deadlines , entered; Parties notified. (signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) (ddarneille) (Entered: 06/21/2000)

June 21, 2000

June 21, 2000

14

INITIAL DISCLOSURES by EEOC, filed. (fmremp) (Entered: 07/20/2000)

July 20, 2000

July 20, 2000

15

Minute entry: Scheudling Conf. held; Apps: Davis and Muphy. Docket Control Order entered. terminated deadlines (hlerma) (Entered: 08/07/2000)

Aug. 4, 2000

Aug. 4, 2000

16

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Pltf expert witness list submitted by 10/13/00 ; Deft expert witness list submitted by 11/17/00 ; Discovery cutoff 3/9/01 ; Deadline for filing all dispositive motions 4/13/01 ; Deadline for filing non-dispositive motions 4/13/01 ; Joint Pretrial order to be submitted on or before 6/1/01 ; Docket call deadline 4:00 7/6/01 ; before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr , entered. Parties notified. ( Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr ) (hlerma) (Entered: 08/07/2000)

Aug. 4, 2000

Aug. 4, 2000

18

AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT for EEOC against Seapac Inc, entered. Parties ntfd. (signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) (ddarneille) (Entered: 01/08/2001)

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

Case closed (ddarneille) (Entered: 01/08/2001)

Jan. 8, 2001

Jan. 8, 2001

Case Details

State / Territory: Texas

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 29, 1999

Closing Date: Jan. 8, 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Seapac, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Amount Defendant Pays: 10000

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits