Case: EEOC v. ADVANCED CLINICAL TECH, INC. d/b/a X-RAY XPRESS

2:98-cv-02020 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Nov. 9, 1998

Closed Date: June 17, 1999

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In November 1998, the EEOC district office in Phoenix, Arizona brought this suit against Advanced Clinical Technology, Inc., Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp., HealthSouth Corporation, and Integrated Health Services, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The complaint is currently unavailable. Before an answer was filed in the case, the parties stipulated to a settlement and had the case dismissed in June 1999.

Summary Authors

Joel Pettit (6/2/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:98-cv-02020

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Advanced Clinical, et al

June 17, 1999

June 17, 1999

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 2, 2024, 3:05 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT FILED (SAT) (Entered: 11/18/1998)

Nov. 9, 1998

Nov. 9, 1998

2

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt prel scheduling conf set for 1:30 4/12/99 (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 12/16/1998)

Dec. 16, 1998

Dec. 16, 1998

3

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED (summons/complaint) upon Stat Agent for dft Advanced Clinical on 3/3/99 (MAP) Modified on 03/24/1999 (Entered: 03/11/1999)

March 10, 1999

March 10, 1999

4

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED (summons/complaint) upon Stat Agent for dft HealthSouth Corp on 3/3/99 (MAP) Modified on 03/24/1999 (Entered: 03/11/1999)

March 10, 1999

March 10, 1999

5

JOINT MOTION to extend time to answer complaint by dfts (all) [5-1] (MAP) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

March 22, 1999

March 22, 1999

6

ORDER by Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt granting motion to extend time to answer complaint by dfts (all) [5-1], time extended thru 4/26/99 FURTHER ORDERED prel scheduling conf re-set for 1:30 5/17/99 (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 03/26/1999)

March 26, 1999

March 26, 1999

7

MINUTE ENTRY before Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt Crt Rptr: Bill McNutt An order to show cause hearing is set for Monday, June 7, 1999 at 1:30 p.m., why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 16 (m) and 37(b)(2)(C) of the Fed.R.Civ.P. [cc: all counsel] [7-2] (TCA) (Entered: 05/17/1999)

May 17, 1999

May 17, 1999

8

MINUTE ENTRY before Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt Crt Rptr: Bill McNutt An order to show cause hearing was held. There being no appearances, IT IS ORDERED dismissing this action pursuant to Rule 16 (m) and 37(b)(2)(A) of the Fed.R. Civ. P. [cc: all counsel/dkt clerk] [8-2] (TCA) (Entered: 06/08/1999)

June 7, 1999

June 7, 1999

9

STIPULATION by pla, dfts (all) re Settlement and Dismissal of Case (MAP) (Entered: 06/08/1999)

June 7, 1999

June 7, 1999

10

JUDGMENT: that Pla take nothing. This complaint and action are hereby dismissed pursuant to Rule 16(m) and 37(b)(2)(A) of Fed.R.Civ.P. terminating case (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 06/09/1999)

June 9, 1999

June 9, 1999

11

NTC OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL terminating attorney Patricia Ann Kirtley for EEOC effective 6/8/99 (former emp) (Entered: 06/10/1999)

June 10, 1999

June 10, 1999

12

ORDER by Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt (re: stipulation [9]) that this action is dismissed w/prejudice, each party to bear own costs and attys' fees incurred in this action (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 06/17/1999)

June 17, 1999

June 17, 1999

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 9, 1998

Closing Date: June 17, 1999

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Integrated Health Services, Inc., Private Entity/Person

HealthSouth Corporation, Private Entity/Person

Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp., Private Entity/Person

Advanced Clinical Technology, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits