University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Fletcher v. Golder VR-MO-0002
Docket / Court 4:1991cv02314 ( E.D. Mo. )
State/Territory Missouri
Case Type(s) Election/Voting Rights
Case Summary
On Novermber 12, 1991, residents and registered voters of St. Louis County filed a lawsuit against the St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs, ... read more >
On Novermber 12, 1991, residents and registered voters of St. Louis County filed a lawsuit against the St. Louis County Board of Election Commissioners under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs, represented by private council, asked the court for both declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging failure on the part of the Election Commissioners to reapportion St. Louis County voting districts in compliance with Articles I and II of the Missouri Constitution as well as the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Specifically, plaintiffs contended that current St. Loius County Council district populations deviated too far from the ideal district size calculated under the 1990 census.

Article II, Section 2.035 of the Missouri Constitution mandated district reapportionment following a decennial census. A board of election commissioners, composed of 7 Democrats and 7 Republicans, was charged with the reapportionment scheme. While there was a general consensus that a "minority district" should be established, disagreement arose over the percentage of African Americans that would compose such a district. Four plans were presented: one by the Democratic members of the committee; one by the Republican members; one by BECO (Black Elected County Officials); and one by Mayor Williams of Velda City. Plans required 9 votes to be approved. After no plan received more than 7 votes of approval, plaintiffs filed suit.

On January 21, 1992 the District Court (Judge Jean C. Hamilton) ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, granting both declaratory and injunctive relief and concluded that a modified Williams Plan best satisfied current constitutional and statutory goals of apportionment. Fletcher v. Golder, No. 91-2314C(7), 1992 WL 100330 (EDMO Jan. 21, 1992).

On February 24, 1992 defendants appealed, noting discrepancies between the Court's opinion describing the districts and the map attached as an appendix to the judgment. However because they also filed a motion to amend the judgment, the District Court retained jurisdiction to hear the matter. The Court (Judge Hamilton) granted the defendants' motion to amend the judgment. Fletcher v. Golder, No. 91-2314C(7), 1992 WL 105910 (EDMO Feb. 24, 1992).

On March 19, 1992, plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, alleging that the District Court erred by excluding as irrelevant the political motivations behind the different reapportionment plans. There, the Court (Judge Roger L. Wollman) held that the political considerations behind any of the plans was legally irrelevant and the District Court judgment was affirmed. Fletcher v. Golder, 959 F.2d 106 (8th Cir. 1992).

David Skillman - 11/15/2006


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Race
Black
Voting
Redistricting/district composition
Vote dilution
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendant(s) Board of Election Commissioners of St. Louis County
Plaintiff Description Residents and registered voters of St. Louis County
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted Unknown
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year 1992
Case Ongoing No
Docket(s)
4:91-cv-02314-JCH (E.D. Mo.) 11/12/1991
VR-MO-0002-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Opinion 01/21/1992 (1992 WL 100330) (E.D. Mo.)
VR-MO-0002-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Opinion 02/24/1992 (1992 WL 105910 / 1992 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 5894) (E.D. Mo.)
VR-MO-0002-0003.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Opinion 03/10/1992 (959 F.2d 106)
VR-MO-0002-0001.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Judges Hamilton, Jean Constance (E.D. Mo.)
VR-MO-0002-0002 | VR-MO-0002-0003 | VR-MO-0002-9000
Magill, Frank J. (Eighth Circuit)
VR-MO-0002-0001
Wollman, Roger Leland (Eighth Circuit)
VR-MO-0002-0001
Woods, Henry (E.D. Ark.)
VR-MO-0002-0001
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Ankney, Gordon L (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0001 | VR-MO-0002-0002 | VR-MO-0002-0003 | VR-MO-0002-9000
Brown, Paul M. (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0001 | VR-MO-0002-0002 | VR-MO-0002-0003 | VR-MO-0002-9000 | VR-MO-0002-9000
Cohen, Patricia L. (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0001
Friedman, Lawrence C. (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0001 | VR-MO-0002-0002 | VR-MO-0002-0003 | VR-MO-0002-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Crowder, Kirk R. (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0001
Garrett, Steven W. (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0002 | VR-MO-0002-0003 | VR-MO-0002-9000
Stout, Neal C. (Missouri)
VR-MO-0002-0001
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -