University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Donnell C. v. Illinois State Board of Education JI-IL-0002
Docket / Court 92-cv-8230 ( N.D. Ill. )
State/Territory Illinois
Case Type(s) Disability Rights-Pub. Accom.
Juvenile Institution
Case Summary
On December 17, 1992, twenty-three school-aged pretrial detainees in the Cook County Jail in Illinois filed this class action lawsuit under the Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause, Equal Protection Clause, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The ... read more >
On December 17, 1992, twenty-three school-aged pretrial detainees in the Cook County Jail in Illinois filed this class action lawsuit under the Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process Clause, Equal Protection Clause, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The plaintiffs filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on behalf of all current and future pretrial detainees confined in the divisions of the Cook County Jail who were or would be entitled under state or federal law to free regular or special education services (approximately 2274 students). The lawsuit was brought against the city of Chicago, Cook County, and the state of Illinois. Named defendants included the Illinois State Board of Education of the City of Chicago and the Superintendent of the Chicago Public Schools.

The plaintiffs, represented by counsel from the Northwestern University School of Law Legal Clinic and the Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago, sought injunctive and declaratory relief and attorney's fees. They alleged that the defendants had denied the plaintiffs' rights to educational services by (1) completely denying special education to those educationally disabled plaintiffs whose needs for such services the defendants failed to identify; (2) denying special education needed by plaintiffs who had been identified as needing such services because of failure to provide sufficient teachers, programs and related services among the population; (3) denying appropriate, individualized special education services to disabled students; (4) denying regular education services to the majority of eligible plaintiffs; and (5) denying to those plaintiffs who were eligible and received regular education services, such services as were equal to eligible children who were not pretrial detainees.

On August 20, 1993, the District Court (Judge John A. Nordberg) denied the state defendants' motion to dismiss, ruling that the plaintiffs had stated valid claims under both the Equal Protection clause and the substantive component of the Due Process clause. Donnell v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 829 F.Supp. 1016 (N.D.Ill. 1993).

In May 1994, the United States filed a Complaint in Intervention seeking to enforce a settlement agreement which had been entered into by the City Defendants and the U.S. Department of Education in August 1992. The City Defendants had failed to (1) make available free education to all detainees under 21 who did not have a high school diploma, were in need of special education services, and had been given permission to participate by prison officials; and (2) implement procedures for screening and evaluation. The United States and the plaintiffs apparently reached a tentative settlement agreement with the defendants regarding liability and attorney's fees and court costs. The State and Chicago defendants acknowledged liability for fees and costs, but the County Defendants asserted that they were not liable for fees and costs. The County defendants moved for partial summary judgement on the issue of monetary liability.

On April 25, 1995, the District Court (Judge Nordberg) granted the County defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, holding that the County defendants were not liable for the plaintiffs' attorney's fees and costs or for the cost of the court expert appointed to monitor the settlement. Donnell v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., No. 92 C. 8230, 1995 WL 248111 (N.D. Ill. April 25, 1995).

On August 10, 1995, the parties entered into a settlement agreement. The agreement included a monitor who reported on the defendants' compliance with the settlement agreement.

On November 8, 2000, Judge John A. Nordberg dismissed the case with leave to reinstate within thirteen months. In 2002, the plaintiffs and the US moved to reinstate the case. In 2003, the plaintiffs agreed to withdraw their motion for reinstatement and the parties reached a private settlement agreement. According to the terms of the agreement, the court retained jurisdiction for 14 months in case one of the plaintiffs moved to reinstate the case. None of the plaintiffs did, and on October 21, 2004, the court finally dismissed the case.

Kristen Sagar - 11/03/2007
Jessica Kincaid - 02/13/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Content of Injunction
Monitor/Master
Monitoring
Discrimination-basis
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
General
Education
Rehabilitation
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701
Indv. w/ Disab. Educ. Act (IDEA), Educ. of All Handcpd. Children Act , 20 U.S.C. § 1400
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendant(s) Chicago Public Schools
City of Chicago
Cook County Jail
Illinois State Board of Education
Plaintiff Description all current and future pretrial detainees who are or would be confined in divisions of Cook County Jail
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Private Settlement Agreement
Order Duration 1995 - 2004
Case Closing Year 2004
Case Ongoing No
Docket(s)
92-8230 (N.D. Ill.) 10/21/2004
JI-IL-0002-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 12/17/1992
JI-IL-0002-0001 PDF | Detail
Memorandum and Opinion 08/18/1993 (N.D. Ill.)
JI-IL-0002-0002 PDF | Detail
Memorandum Opinion and Order 08/20/1993 (829 F.Supp. 1016) (N.D. Ill.)
JI-IL-0002-0003 PDF | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Memorandum Opinion and Order 04/25/1995 (1995 WL 248111 / 1995 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 6027) (N.D. Ill.)
JI-IL-0002-0004 PDF | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Judges Nordberg, John Albert (N.D. Ill.)
JI-IL-0002-0002 | JI-IL-0002-0003 | JI-IL-0002-0004 | JI-IL-0002-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers DeWolfe, Ruthanne (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-0001 | JI-IL-0002-0003 | JI-IL-0002-9000
Elson, John S. (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-0001 | JI-IL-0002-0003 | JI-IL-0002-9000
Fox, Michele Marion (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Glassman, Jeremiah (District of Columbia)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Haugen, Gary A. (District of Columbia)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Blanchard, Patrick Malone (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Cash, Pamela Elana (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Hernandez, Michael Joseph (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Ioppolo, Thomas A. (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-0003 | JI-IL-0002-9000
McDonald, Terry L. (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Pistorius, William P. (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Rodriguez, Miguel Angel (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Sholder, Iris Ellen (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Sprovieri, Connie R. (Illinois)
JI-IL-0002-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -