Filed Date: 2002
Case Ongoing
Clearinghouse coding complete
Six prisoners lodged in West Virginia's regional and county jails while awaiting transfer to prisons, including a new one under construction, filed a lawsuit under W. Va. Code § 62-13-1 in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia against the state's Department of Corrections (DOC) on October 4, 2000. The plaintiffs alleged that the delays in transfers from facilities that were not operated by the DOC and were designed for shorter-term stays to longer-term prisons was a denial of the rehabilitative programs to which they were entitled. The prisoners were represented by the Kanawha County Public Defender's Office.
On December 8, 2000, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia issued an unsigned per curiam opinion granting relief in mandamus, appointing Special Master Forrest H. Roles to develop a long term plan for reducing the number of state prisoners held in county and regional jails. State ex rel. Sams v. Kirby, 542 S.E.2d 889 (W. Va. 2000). On September 20, 2002, Roles submitted the long term plan to the court.
On January 2, 2003, the court issued an order directing that they should revisit the matter after one year to see what progress had been made by the legislative and executive branches of the state government toward enforcing the plan. On November 30, 2005, the court issued a second unsigned per curiam opinion in the case, stating that the long term plan had been a dismal failure due to the failure of the legislative and executive branches to act upon it. State ex rel. Sams v. Commissioner, 625 S.E.2d 334 (W. Va. 2005). They urged the two branches to act, noting that policies related to prisons were not up to the judiciary to determine. The court added that if the executive and legislative branches failed to do so, they could soon be answering to a federal court for violating prisoners' rights under the U.S. Constitution. As it stood, however, the court found that it could not issue a writ of mandamus because the persons experiencing constitutional deprivations were inmates housed outside of DOC facilities.
Summary Authors
Kristen Sagar (2/24/2006)
Campbell, Wendy (West Virginia)
Castelle, George (West Virginia)
Boothroyd, John H. (West Virginia)
Houdyschell, Charles P. Jr. (West Virginia)
Cardinal, Chad M (West Virginia)
Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 2:38 p.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: West Virginia
Case Type(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: 2002
Case Ongoing: Yes
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Inmates who had been sentenced to confinement in facilities of West Virginia Division of Corrections but who nonetheless remained confined in jails asserting that their continued incarceration in regional and county jails was unlawful
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: Unknown
Class Action Sought: Unknown
Class Action Outcome: Unknown
Defendants
West Virginia Department of Corrections , State
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Order Duration: 2000 - None
Issues
General:
Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:
Type of Facility: