Case: Jungwirth v. Barnes

3:83-00634 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: May 6, 1983

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Male inmates confined in the Washington County Jail in Hillsboro, Oregon, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against the county under 42 U.S.C. §1983 requesting that the county provide them with adequate and private space in which they could confer with their attorneys at the jail. The District Court (Judge James A. Redden) entered a consent decree on January 3, 1984, stating that in addition to the then-existing attorney interview booths, the county was required …

Male inmates confined in the Washington County Jail in Hillsboro, Oregon, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against the county under 42 U.S.C. §1983 requesting that the county provide them with adequate and private space in which they could confer with their attorneys at the jail. The District Court (Judge James A. Redden) entered a consent decree on January 3, 1984, stating that in addition to the then-existing attorney interview booths, the county was required to set aside two hours daily in the jail law library for the purposes of attorney/client interviews. Also, depending on the law library's use by inmates for legal research, the library should be made available, upon request, at other times of the day for attorney/client interviews, and if the law library is not available for attorney/client interviews, then jail officials, upon request, are required to make reasonable efforts to attempt to secure other areas within the Washington County Jail for confidential attorney/client interviews.

The docket in this case was not available from PACER. All the information on the case that we have gathered is from a reported opinion in the related case Steinke v. Washington County (JC-OR-003) (regarding criminal defense attorneys' right to confidential interviews with their clients, inmates at the Washington County Jail). Steinke v. Washington County, 857 F.Supp. 55 (D.Or. 1994).

Summary Authors

Tom Madison (3/14/2006)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

No documents yet available via the Clearinghouse.

Docket

Last updated April 2, 2024, 3 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Oregon

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 6, 1983

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Male inmates confined in the Washington County Jail in Hillsboro, Oregon

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Washington County Jail (Hillsboro), County

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Procedural Due Process

Available Documents:

None of the above

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1984 - None

Issues

General:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Law library access

Affected Sex or Gender:

Male

Type of Facility:

Government-run