University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Mokdad v. Lynch NS-MI-0004
Docket / Court 2:13-cv-12038-VAR-RSW ( E.D. Mich. )
State/Territory Michigan
Case Type(s) National Security
Case Summary
On May 8, 2013, a private individual who was previously denied boarding on commercial airline flights filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff brought this action against the U.S. Department of Justice and the ... read more >
On May 8, 2013, a private individual who was previously denied boarding on commercial airline flights filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff brought this action against the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq. and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201.

Specifically, the plaintiff, a U.S. citizen, claimed that he was previously denied boarding of flights to and from the United States to his home country of Lebanon. The plaintiff claimed that he was listed on the Transportation Security Administration's No Fly List, which is maintained by the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), a division of the FBI. Individuals who are listed on the No Fly List are able to complain via the Traveler Redress Inquiry Program (TRIP) to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The plaintiff claimed to have filed three TRIP inquiries with the DHS, to no avail. As such, he had been unable to visit his family members in Lebanon or be present in Lebanon for an ongoing civil suit that he was a participant in. The plaintiff claimed the government's actions violated his Due Process rights under the Fifth Amendment and his rights under the Administrative Procedures Act to adequate redress regarding his placement on the No Fly List. The plaintiff requested declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as attorneys' fees and litigation costs.

On July 22, 2013, the government moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under 49 U.S.C. § 46110. This statute limits jurisdiction of TSA orders to U.S. Courts of Appeal. On December 5, U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts granted the government's motion and dismissed this case. 2013 WL 8840322.

On January 24, 2014, the plaintiff appealed the District Court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The plaintiff argued § 46110 did not apply because he was contesting his placement on the No Fly List by the TSC, which is not part of the TSA. The plaintiff relied on Ibrahim v. Department of Homeland Security, 538 F.3d 1250 (9th Cir. 2008) (NS-CA-0009 in this Clearinghouse), which held that the TSC was not covered by § 46110. On October 26, 2015, the Sixth Circuit issued a decision reversing the District Court's dismissal. The Sixth Circuit agreed with the Ninth Circuit, holding that the plaintiff was indeed challenging a TSC order, not a TSA order. However, the Sixth Circuit dismissed the plaintiff's challenges to the adequacy of the redress process because the TSA was not joined as a defendant. The Sixth Circuit remanded this case to the District Court for further proceedings. 2015 WL 6444668.

As of November 17, 2015, this case is ongoing in the U.S. District Court.

John He - 11/11/2015


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Male
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
Law-enforcement
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
General
Inadequate citizen complaint investigations and procedures
Racial profiling
Record-keeping
Records Disclosure
Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues
Watchlist
Immigration
Border police
Constitutional rights
National Origin/Ethnicity
Arab/Afgani/Middle Eastern
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Defendant(s) Federal Bureau of Investigation
Transportation Security Administration
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff Description A private individual who was previously denied boarding on commercial airline flights.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Links Guest Post: New Resource — Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse FISA Archives
Just Security
Posted: Jun. 26, 2014
By: Margo Schlanger
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:13-cv-12038 (E.D. Mich.) 10/29/2015
NS-MI-0004-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Plaintiff's Verified Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief 05/08/2013
NS-MI-0004-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 12/05/2013 (2013 WL 8840322) (E.D. Mich.)
NS-MI-0004-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion [of the Sixth Circuit] 10/26/2015 (2015 WL 6444668)
NS-MI-0004-0003.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Batchelder, Alice Moore (Sixth Circuit, N.D. Ohio)
NS-MI-0004-0003
Gibbons, Julia Smith (Sixth Circuit, W.D. Tenn.)
NS-MI-0004-0003
Gilman, Ronald Lee (Sixth Circuit)
NS-MI-0004-0003
Roberts, Victoria A. (E.D. Mich.)
NS-MI-0004-0002 | NS-MI-0004-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Ayad, Nabih H (Michigan)
NS-MI-0004-0001 | NS-MI-0004-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Folio, Joseph C III (District of Columbia)
NS-MI-0004-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -