University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia v. Sebelius FA-PA-0011
Docket / Court 2:14-cv-03096-RB ( E.D. Pa. )
State/Territory Pennsylvania
Case Type(s) Speech and Religious Freedom
Special Collection Contraception Insurance Mandate
Case Summary
Several non-profit corporations (the "Affiliates"), which were affiliated with the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia (the "Archdiocese") and participated in the archdiocese health care plan, were required under the Affordable Care Act and its regulations (the "Mandate") (issued by the U.S. ... read more >
Several non-profit corporations (the "Affiliates"), which were affiliated with the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia (the "Archdiocese") and participated in the archdiocese health care plan, were required under the Affordable Care Act and its regulations (the "Mandate") (issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) to sign and deliver a self-certification to a third party administrator, who could unilaterally choose to supply abortifacients and contraceptive services, in violation of the religious belief held by the Affiliates. Meanwhile, the Archdiocese, which was itself exempted from the Mandate, refused to facilitate any provision of contraceptive services in the archdiocese health care plan for the same religious reason.

Not wanting to pay any monetary penalties for noncompliance with the Mandate or to expel the Affiliates from the plan, the Archdiocese, along with the Affiliates, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (the "RFRA"), against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor and U.S. Department of Treasury on June 2, 2014. The Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought declaratory and injunctive relief as well as attorneys' fees, claiming that the Defendants through the Mandate had imposed a substantial burden on their exercise of religion, in violation of the RFRA as well as the Free Exercise and Free Speech clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

On June 26, 2014, the District Court (Judge Ronald L. Buckwalter) denied the Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. Judge Buckwalter raised doubts as to Plaintiffs' standing in bringing their RFRA challenge and found that Plaintiffs had not met their burden to show a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims. The Plaintiffs appealed to the Third Circuit (14-3126). The case is ongoing.

Emma Bao - 11/12/2014


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Freedom of speech/association
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief denied
Defendant-type
Hospital/Health Department
Jurisdiction-wide
General
Abortion
Contraception
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit religious organization
Type of Facility
Non-government non-profit
Causes of Action Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Defendant(s) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Plaintiff Description A Roman Catholic archdiocese and its affiliated non-profit corporations participating in the archdiocese health care plan, required under the Affordable Care Act to provide coverage in the health plans for certain preventive care for women, including potential abortifacients.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Docket(s)
2:14−cv−03096 (E.D. Pa.) 07/28/2014
FA-PA-0011-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 06/02/2014
FA-PA-0011-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum [Stating the Court will Deny Plaintiffs' Motion for Injunctive Relief] 06/26/2014 (E.D. Pa.)
FA-PA-0011-0002.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Buckwalter, Ronald Lawrence (E.D. Pa.)
FA-PA-0011-0002 | FA-PA-0011-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Centrella, Nicholas M. (Pennsylvania)
FA-PA-0011-0001 | FA-PA-0011-9000
Emmerich, Frank R. Jr. (Pennsylvania)
FA-PA-0011-0001 | FA-PA-0011-9000
Voss, Joshua (Pennsylvania)
FA-PA-0011-0001 | FA-PA-0011-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Bennett, Michelle Renee (District of Columbia)
FA-PA-0011-9000
Grogg, Adam Anderson (District of Columbia)
FA-PA-0011-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -