University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Wheaton College v. Sebelius FA-IL-0013
Docket / Court 1:13-cv-08910 ( N.D. Ill. )
State/Territory Illinois
Case Type(s) Speech and Religious Freedom
Special Collection Contraception Insurance Mandate
Case Summary
On December 13, 2013, Wheaton College, a Christian school, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The college sued under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Administrative Procedures Act against the Department of Health and Human Services. The ... read more >
On December 13, 2013, Wheaton College, a Christian school, filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The college sued under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Administrative Procedures Act against the Department of Health and Human Services. The college, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that the Final Mandate of the Affordable Care Act, which requires the college to offer health insurance plans that provide free coverage of contraceptives that the college views as abortifacients, violates the RFRA; the APA; the Free Exercise, Free Speech, and Establishment Clauses of the 1st Amendment; and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 5th Amendment. The college had previously filed this suit in the District of the District of Columbia, where it was dismissed as moot by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on August 13, 2013 Wheaton College v. Sebelius.

Specifically, Wheaton claimed that its identity as a Christian liberal arts college forbids it from providing access to abortion, including what it views as abortifacient drugs or devices. The college claims that these religious beliefs preclude it from participating in the ACA's regulatory scheme to provide and subsidize these drugs and devices. Nor can the college participate in the accommodation offered by the government, which would still require it to designate an agent to pay for the objected-to services on Wheaton's behalf, as well as to take steps to trigger the coverage; the accommodation itself violates the school's religious beliefs, Wheaton argued.

The Final Mandate was set to go into effect on July 1, 2014.

On June 23, 2014, the district court (Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.) denied Wheaton's motion for a preliminary injunction of the Final Mandate. The court held that Wheaton had no likelihood of success in establishing a substantial burden on its religious exercise, given the accommodation that the government offered it.

On June 30, 2014, the day before the regulations took effect, Wheaton filed an emergency motion for reconsideration, which the court denied based in part on the Hobby Lobby decision handed down by the Supreme Court that same day. Nothing in that decision, the court said, overruled controlling 7th Circuit precedent regarding the sufficiency of the government's accommodation.

That same day, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit (Judge Richard Posner) also denied Wheaton's emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal, stating that Hobby Lobby emphasized that the accommodation provision "constitutes an alternative that achieves all of the Government's aims while providing greater respect for religious liberty."

But the Supreme Court did grant a temporary injunction on June 30, 2014, over the dissents of Justices Breyer and Sotomayor. 134 S.Ct. 2898.

On July 3, 2014, the Supreme Court ordered that the injunction remain, pending appeal, so long as Wheaton informed the Secretary of HHS of its religious objections in writing. In other words, the college did not have to follow the accommodation's procedures. Justices Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Kagan dissented. 134 S.Ct. 2806.

On July 1, 2015, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s denial of Wheaton’s request for a preliminary injunction. On December 2, 2015, the District Court issued a minute entry granting the parties’ joint motion to stay the case until the ruling inLittle Sisters of the Poor v. Burwell., consolidated as Zubik v. Burwell, so that the parties can evaluate the case following that ruling, expected in summer 2016.

Andrew Junker - 10/16/2014
Kate Craddock - 02/07/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Equal Protection
Establishment Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Freedom of speech/association
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief granted
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
Discrimination-basis
Religion discrimination
General
Abortion
Contraception
Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)
Religious programs / policies
School/University policies
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit religious organization
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bivens
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Defendant(s) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff Description Christian liberal arts college in Illinois opposed to ACA contraception mandate
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration 2014 - 2015
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Case Listing FA-DC-0002 : Wheaton College v. Sebelius (D.D.C.)
Docket(s)
1:13-cv-08910 (N.D. Ill.) 12/02/2015
FA-IL-0013-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 12/13/2013
FA-IL-0013-0003.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order and Opinion denying motion for prelim. injunction 06/23/2014 (N.D. Ill.)
FA-IL-0013-0004.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [Sp. Ct. granting temporary injunction pending respondent's response] 06/30/2014 (134 S.Ct. 2898 / 190 L.Ed.2d 32)
FA-IL-0013-0001.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Supreme Court website
Order denying plaintiff's emergency motion for reconsideration 06/30/2014 (2014 WL 3034010) (N.D. Ill.)
FA-IL-0013-0005.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order 06/30/2014 (2014 WL 3034614)
FA-IL-0013-0009.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order in Pending Case [Sp. Ct. granting injunction pending appeal] 07/03/2014 (134 S.Ct. 2806 / 189 L.Ed.2d 856)
FA-IL-0013-0002.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Supreme Court website
Opinion 07/01/2015 (791 F.3d 792)
FA-IL-0013-0010.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Notification of Docket Entry 12/02/2015
FA-IL-0013-0008.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Breyer, Stephen Gerald (First Circuit, SCOTUS)
FA-IL-0013-0001
Dow, Robert Michael Jr. (N.D. Ill.)
FA-IL-0013-0004 | FA-IL-0013-0005 | FA-IL-0013-0008 | FA-IL-0013-9000
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (D.C. Circuit, SCOTUS)
FA-IL-0013-0002
Hamilton, David Frank (Seventh Circuit, S.D. Ind.)
FA-IL-0013-0009
Kagan, Elena (SCOTUS)
FA-IL-0013-0002
Posner, Richard Allen (Seventh Circuit)
FA-IL-0013-0009 | FA-IL-0013-0010
Scalia, Antonin (D.C. Circuit, SCOTUS)
FA-IL-0013-0002
Sotomayor, Sonia (SCOTUS, Second Circuit, S.D.N.Y.)
FA-IL-0013-0001 | FA-IL-0013-0002
Williams, Ann Claire (Seventh Circuit, N.D. Ill.)
FA-IL-0013-0009
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Keim, Adele A. (District of Columbia)
FA-IL-0013-0003 | FA-IL-0013-9000
Poland, Christian Mark (Illinois)
FA-IL-0013-0003 | FA-IL-0013-9000
Rienzi, Mark (District of Columbia)
FA-IL-0013-0003 | FA-IL-0013-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Saltman, Julie Shana (District of Columbia)
FA-IL-0013-9000
Other Lawyers Amiri, Brigitte A. (New York)
FA-IL-0013-9000
Chaiten, Lorie (Illinois)
FA-IL-0013-9000
Lee, Jennifer (New York)
FA-IL-0013-9000
Mach, Daniel (District of Columbia)
FA-IL-0013-9000
Muniz, Richard (Illinois)
FA-IL-0013-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -