University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name In re Application of the FBI for an Order Requiring the Production of Tangible Things From [Redacted], BR 14-01 NS-DC-0051
Docket / Court BR 14-01 ( FISC )
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) National Security
Special Collection Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- All Matters
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- Telephony Metadata
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
Case Summary
For the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse collection of FISA matters, see our special collection.

On January 3, 2014, the Director of National Intelligence announced that the Foreign Intelligence ... read more >
For the Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse collection of FISA matters, see our special collection.

On January 3, 2014, the Director of National Intelligence announced that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("FISC") had again approved the National Security Agency's ("NSA") so-called "Bulk Telephony Metadata Program" under Section 501 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 ("FISA"), commonly referred to as Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. Press release available here.

Under the program, the NSA has collected records from large telecommunication companies about, apparently, virtually all domestic telephone calls. These records, termed "telephony metadata," include the phone numbers placed and received; the date, time and duration of calls; some location identifiers; and calling card numbers. The records, however, apparently do not include the parties' names, addresses or financial information or the call's content. Once collected, the records are stored for several years and may be queried, used, and disseminated only in accordance with "minimization rules" proposed by the government and approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("FISC"). The most basic aspect of the minimization rules has been that the metadata records can be queried when there is a reasonable suspicion, based on specific and articulated facts, that the identifier that will be used as the basis for the query is associated with specified foreign terrorist organizations.

The program began under executive authority alone, following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. Subsequently, in 2006, the federal government first sought approval of the program from the FISC under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. This Section 215 order must be reviewed and reapproved by the FISC essentially every 90 days. It has been approved dozens of times by many different federal judges, on the FISC, since its initial approval on May 24, 2006 by the FISC. (See BR 06-05, NS-DC-0009 in this Clearinghouse.)

This particular Section 215 order was granted by FISC Judge Thomas F. Hogan on January 3, 2014. It was preceded by BR 13-158, NS-DC-0018 in this Clearinghouse. Notably, this was the first FISC order approving the NSA's program after the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held that the program was likely unconstitutional. See Klayman v. Obama NS-DC-0007.

In a speech on January 17, 2014, President Obama announced his intention to end the Section 215 bulk telephony metadata program as it previously existed. The President ordered two main changes to effectuate that goal. First, he directed the Attorney General to work with the FISC to ensure that, absent a true emergency, telephony metadata can be queried only after a judicial finding that there is a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the selection term is associated with an approved international terrorist organization. Second, the President directed that the query results must be limited to metadata within two hops of the selection term instead of three, that is, phone calls that are only two steps removed from a number linked to a terrorist group rather than three. The President also directed the intelligence community and the Attorney General to develop options for a new approach more generally. See http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/01/17/remarks-president-review-signals-intelligence.

Shortly after the President's speech, on January 22, 2014, a telecommunications provider requested that the FISC modify or vacate its January 3 primary order in light of Klayman. On January 23, 2014, Judge Rosemary M. Collyer issued a scheduling order to review the petition. The order required all filings to be made under seal.

On February 5, 2014, the federal government itself requested that the FISC amend its January 3 primary order to implement the two changes that the President directed in his January 17 address. FISC Judge Reggie B. Walton granted the federal government's request later that day.

On February 12, 2014, the federal government responded to the telecommunications provider's petition and requested that the Court affirm its January 3 secondary order.

On February 25, 2014, the federal government submitted a motion for second amendment to the January 3 primary order, requesting that the FISC extend the disposal deadline for telephony metadata from five years to an indefinite time period. The government made this request in light of its duty to preserve evidence that could become relevant to pending civil litigation. On March 7, 2014, Judge Walton issued an opinion and order denying the motion without prejudice. The Court rejected the government's premise that the duty to avoid spoliation superseded requirements to destroy information under FISC orders approved pursuant to Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act.

Because the FISC's denial was without prejudice, on March 11, 2014, the federal government filed a motion for temporary relief from the five-year destruction requirement, providing additional facts to support its motion. In particular, the government noted that a U.S. District Court had issued a temporary restraining order on March 10, 2014, against the destruction of any telephony metadata in three other cases. These cases were Jewel v. NSA, NS-CA-0006, and First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. National Security Agency, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/27/statement-president-section-215-bulk-metadata-program.

This approach required legislation to succeed, but Congress has so far failed to enact the proposed bills. Accordingly, when the authorization in this matter's January 3 primary order expired on March 28, 2014, the government sought a 90-day reauthorization of the existing Bulk Telephony Metadata program, as modified by the changes that the President directed in January. That reauthorization request and order can be found in BR 14-67, NS-DC-0055, in this Clearinghouse.

Like the other FISC proceedings, this matter was originally classified and sealed. But Judge Collyer concluded on April 11, 2014, that the Court had the discretion to unseal the petition and related Court records under the appropriate circumstances and that it should exercise this authority. The parties agreed that the Court had the authority to unseal the properly declassified versions of the records. The sealing requirement in Section 1861(f)(5) applies to the filing of a petition and therefore by its terms binds the petitioner but not the Court. On April 25, 2014, Judge Collyer unsealed five of this matter's documents in redacted form: the Petition filed January 22, 2014; the Scheduling Order dated January 23, 2014; the Response of the United States filed February 12, 2014; the Opinion and Order dated March 20, 2014; and the Order dated April 11, 2014. The documents were published on the FISC's website in redacted form, and they are included in the record in this Clearinghouse as well.

Michael Mirdamadi - 05/11/2014
Jessica Kincaid - 07/01/2014
Brian Tengel - 02/23/2015


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Unreasonable search and seizure
Content of Injunction
Monitoring
Recordkeeping
Reporting
Warrant/order for search or seizure
General
Record-keeping
Records Disclosure
Search policies
Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues
Plaintiff Type
U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff
Causes of Action FISA Title V order (PATRIOT Act § 215, business records or other tangible things), 50 U.S.C. §§ 1861-1862
Defendant(s) None on record
Plaintiff Description U.S. Government, proceeding by an application by the FBI, on behalf of the NSA
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration 2014 - 2014
Case Closing Year 2014
Case Ongoing No
Case Listing NS-CA-0002 : Jewel v. National Security Agency (N.D. Cal.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Links Guest Post: New Resource — Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse FISA Archives
Just Security
Posted: Jun. 26, 2014
By: Margo Schlanger
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
No docket sheet currently in the collection
General Documents
Primary Order 01/03/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Petition 01/22/2014
NS-DC-0051-0011.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Scheduling Order 01/23/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0012.pdf | Detail
MOTION FOR AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY ORDER 02/05/2014
NS-DC-0051-0002.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO AMEND THE COURT’S PRIMARY ORDER DATED JANUARY 3, 2014 02/05/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0003.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE PETITION 02/12/2014
NS-DC-0051-0013.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
MOTION FOR SECOND AMENDMENT TO PRIMARY ORDER 02/25/2014
NS-DC-0051-0018.pdf | Detail
ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE COURT'S PRIMARY ORDER DATED JANUARY 3, 2014 03/07/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0019.pdf | Detail
Opinion and Order 03/07/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0021.pdf | Detail
PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF EX PARTE MOTION 03/10/2014
NS-DC-0051-0017.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 03/11/2014
NS-DC-0051-0004.pdf | Detail
Opinion and Order 03/12/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0022.pdf | Detail
OPINION AND ORDER 03/20/2014 (2014 WL 5463097) (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0014.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Opinion and Order 03/21/2014 (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0005.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Notice of Order 03/28/2014
NS-DC-0051-0006.pdf | Detail
RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE COURT'S MARCH 21,2014, OPINION AND ORDER 04/03/2014
NS-DC-0051-0007.pdf | Detail
NOTICE REGARDING THE RESPONSE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE COURT 04/03/2014
NS-DC-0051-0008.pdf | Detail
Letter [to Judge] 04/10/2014
NS-DC-0051-0010.pdf | Detail
Order 04/11/2014 (2014 WL 5463107) (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0015.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT FROM PLAINTIFFS IN JEWEL V. NSA AND FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH V. NSA 04/18/2014
NS-DC-0051-0020.pdf | Detail
ORDER REGARDING UNSEALING AND PUBLICATION 04/25/2014 (2014 WL 5460706) (FISC)
NS-DC-0051-0016.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Judges Collyer, Rosemary M. (FISC, D.D.C.)
NS-DC-0051-0012 | NS-DC-0051-0014 | NS-DC-0051-0015 | NS-DC-0051-0016
Hogan, Thomas Francis (FISC, D.D.C.)
NS-DC-0051-0001
Walton, Reggie B. (FISC, D.D.C.)
NS-DC-0051-0003 | NS-DC-0051-0005 | NS-DC-0051-0019 | NS-DC-0051-0021 | NS-DC-0051-0022
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Carlin, John P. (District of Columbia)
NS-DC-0051-0002 | NS-DC-0051-0004 | NS-DC-0051-0007 | NS-DC-0051-0013 | NS-DC-0051-0018 | NS-DC-0051-0020
Cohn, Cindy A. (California)
NS-DC-0051-0017
Cole, James M. (District of Columbia)
NS-DC-0051-0002
Defendant's Lawyers Delery, Stuart F. (District of Columbia)
NS-DC-0051-0004 | NS-DC-0051-0007 | NS-DC-0051-0018 | NS-DC-0051-0020
Gauhar, Tashina (District of Columbia)
NS-DC-0051-0006 | NS-DC-0051-0008 | NS-DC-0051-0010 | NS-DC-0051-0013 | NS-DC-0051-0020
Hartnett, Kathleen R. (District of Columbia)
NS-DC-0051-0006 | NS-DC-0051-0008 | NS-DC-0051-0020
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -