Filed Date: Nov. 22, 2013
Clearinghouse coding complete
On November 22, 2013, two women in a long term relationship filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Cook County. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, the ACLU, and Lambda Legal, asked the Court to prohibit the County from enforcing the state marriage ban and to require the County to issue them a marriage license. The plaintiffs contended that failure to do so would constitute a violation of the due process and equal protection guarantees of the United States Constitution.
One of the plaintiffs suffers from terminal breast cancer and she and her longtime partner wish to be married in Illinois before she passes away. An immediate injunction prohibiting enforcement of the Illinois marriage ban would be the only way to ensure that plaintiffs' hope of being legally married would be realized during their lifetimes. Although the Illinois legislature enacted a law that would allow same-sex couples to marry, that law was not scheduled to go into effect until June 1, 2014 (about six months after the complaint was filed). The plaintiffs feared that the terminally ill plaintiff would not live until the expiration of the marriage ban and asked the court to prohibit the County from enforcing the marriage ban in their specific case.
On December 5, 2013, Judge Thomas Durkin issued an opinion granting injunctive relief to the plaintiffs. The Court found that given the compelling circumstances surrounding the plaintiff's medical condition and her potentially imminent death, the injury she and her partner would suffer by denying injunctive relief would be irreparably great. The court noted that the relief granted was limited and extended no further than to the specific plaintiffs. The Court ultimately ordered the County not to enforce the marriage ban and to issue the plaintiffs a marriage license. 2013 WL 6355918, __ F. Supp. 2d __ (N.D. Ill. 2013).
Summary Authors
Nate West (9/23/2014)
For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4261630/parties/gray-v-orr/
Durkin, Thomas Michael (Illinois)
Beem, Marc Oliver (Illinois)
Clark, Christopher R (Illinois)
Dawson, Kay L. (Illinois)
Baker, Sisavanh Baccam (Illinois)
Durkin, Thomas Michael (Illinois)
Gilbert, Jeffrey (Illinois)
See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4261630/gray-v-orr/
Last updated March 13, 2024, 3:06 a.m.
State / Territory: Illinois
Case Type(s):
Public Benefits/Government Services
Special Collection(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: Nov. 22, 2013
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Two women in a committed relationship seek a temporary restraining order enjoining Defendant from enforcing the Illinois marriage ban because one Plaintiff faces imminent death and would like to marry before the ban expires.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Attorney Organizations:
Public Interest Lawyer: Yes
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Available Documents:
Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Order Duration: 2013 - 2014
Content of Injunction:
Issues
General:
LGBTQ+:
Discrimination-basis:
Affected Sex or Gender: