University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Raza v. City of New York NS-NY-0005
Docket / Court 1:13-cv-03448 ( E.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) National Security
Attorney Organization ACLU National (all projects)
Case Summary
On June 18, 2013, plaintiffs, a group of Muslim residents of New York City, as well as two mosques and a charitable organization located in New York City, filed this § 1983 suit in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU, sued the ... read more >
On June 18, 2013, plaintiffs, a group of Muslim residents of New York City, as well as two mosques and a charitable organization located in New York City, filed this § 1983 suit in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs, represented by the ACLU, sued the New York City and the New York City Police Department (NYPD) alleging unlawful surveillance that targeted Muslims in violation of the Fourteenth and First Amendments and the New York state constitution.

The case was assigned to Judge Pam Chen. Discovery proceeded, and led to an opinion by Judge Chen on Nov. 22, 2013, Raza v. City of New York, 998 F. Supp. 2d 70 (E.D.N.Y. 2013). She explained that "Plaintiffs seek a wide range of documents and information relating not only to the NYPD's surveillance and investigation of Plaintiffs, but the NYPD's investigative policies and activities relating to all Muslim individuals and organizations, and relating to all non-Muslim individuals and organizations, where the policy or activity is or was based on the individual's or organization's religious speech, beliefs, practices, and activities." The city opposed these requests, arguing that only documents related to the particular plaintiffs should be discoverable. The court sided largely with the plaintiffs, ruling: "Because evidence of Defendants' intent with respect to their investigative activities of Plaintiffs is central to Plaintiffs' Equal Protection claims, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs are entitled to discovery regarding any NYPD policy or program involving the investigation of Muslims as a group based, in whole or part, on their religion. Without this discovery, Plaintiffs would be preemptively and irreparably prohibited from proving that Defendants' alleged discriminatory intent was a motivating factor in the investigation and surveillance of Plaintiffs. Contrary to Defendants' contention, this is more than a mere "fishing expedition." However, the Court denied discovery on all potential other investigations, which was sought to provide a comparison with the plaintiffs.

Litigation was stayed from July 22, 2014, to January 6, 2016, while the parties negotiated a settlement agreement. On January 7, 2016, the parties submitted an agreement for approval by the Court. The settlement dictated that the defendant would conform its investigations involving political activity to the Constitution, including the elimination of racial profiling as a motivating factor for investigation. The defendant also agreed to remove the "Radicalization in the West Report" from its website. In addition, the guidelines established in Handschu v. Special Services Division limiting NYPD investigations of political activity were modified. The modified guidelines for reviews of ongoing investigations, establish the Handschu Committee to oversee investigations and set out the requirements for the appointment of a Civilian Representative, require that choices in investigation techniques take into account the effect on religious and political activities of individuals, including those not the target of investigation, and require that undercover investigations only be used when there is no less intrusive means to acquire the sought after information. They also dictate that investigations respect the constitutional right to be free of investigation in which race, religion, or ethnicity is a substantial or motivating factor. The defendant paid $1,671,686 in attorney fees and expenses. Approval of the agreement is still pending.

Elizabeth Homan - 11/01/2013
Katherine Reineck - 04/10/2016

compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Constitutional Clause
Equal Protection
Establishment Clause
Free Exercise Clause
National origin discrimination
Religion discrimination
Racial profiling
Religious programs / policies
Search policies
Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues
National Origin/Ethnicity
Arab/Afgani/Middle Eastern
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendant(s) City of New York
New York Police Department
Plaintiff Description Plaintiffs are a group of residents of New York City who are Muslim, as well as two mosques and a charitable organization located in New York City.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU National (all projects)
Class action status sought Unknown
Class action status granted Unknown
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Attorneys fees
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Case Listing PN-NY-0007 : Handschu v. Special Services Division (S.D.N.Y.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Links Guest Post: New Resource — Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse FISA Archives
Just Security
Posted: Jun. 26, 2014
By: Margo Schlanger
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

1:13−cv−03448 (E.D.N.Y.) 01/13/2016
NS-NY-0005-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
ECF Case Complaint 07/18/2013
NS-NY-0005-0001 PDF | Detail
Document Source:
Memorandum & Order 11/22/2013 (998 F.Supp.2d 70) (E.D.N.Y.)
NS-NY-0005-0003 PDF | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Bloomberg Law
Stipulation of Settlement and Order, and Exhibit (Modification to Handschu Guidelines) 01/07/2016
NS-NY-0005-0002 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Azrack, Joan Marie (E.D.N.Y.) [Magistrate]
Chen, Pamela K. Court not on record
NS-NY-0005-0003 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Choudhury, Nusrat Jahan (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Eisenberg, Arthur (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-0002 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Gallegos, Hector (District of Columbia)
Hirose, Mariko (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Kassem, Ramzi (Connecticut)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-0002 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Shamas, Diala (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Shamsi, Hina (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-0002 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Toomey, Patrick Christopher (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0001 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Farrell, Peter Girard (New York)
NS-NY-0005-0002 | NS-NY-0005-9000
Leist, Alexis L. (New York)
Shammas, Cheryl Leah (New York)
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -