University of Michigan Law School
The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth v. Sebelius FA-TX-0002
Docket / Court 4:12-cv-00314 ( N.D. Tex. )
State/Territory Texas
Case Type(s) Speech and Religious Freedom
Case Summary
On May 21, 2012, the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas against the Federal Government under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000bb), the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706(2)), and the First Amendment. Plaintiffs, ... read more >
On May 21, 2012, the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas against the Federal Government under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000bb), the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706(2)), and the First Amendment. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought to enjoin enforcement of provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) extending universal contraception coverage in employer-sponsored private health insurance coverage. Plaintiffs contended that this mandatory contraception coverage violates their sincerely held religious beliefs.

On January 31, 2013, Judge Terry R. Means denied the U.S. motion to dismiss for lack of ripeness. The case is ongoing.

Christopher Schad - 05/20/2012
Wyatt Fore - 03/29/2013


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Establishment Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Freedom of speech/association
Discrimination-basis
Religion discrimination
General
Contraception
Religious programs / policies
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Defendant(s) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of Treasury
Plaintiff Description The Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party not on record
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Form of Settlement
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Docket(s)
4:12-cv-314 (N.D. Tex.) 03/21/2013
FA-TX-0002-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Plaintiff's Original Complaint 05/21/2012
FA-TX-0002-0001 PDF | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [denying defendants' motion to dismiss] 01/31/2013 (N.D. Tex.)
FA-TX-0002-0002 PDF | Detail
Document Source: Bloomberg Law
Judges Means, Terry R. (N.D. Tex.)
FA-TX-0002-0002 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Crumley, John W. (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Ghorayeb, Basheer Y. (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Lyons, Katherine J. (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Marinkovic, Tamara (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Murphy, Terence M. (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Schroeter, Thomas K. (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Teater, James S. (Texas)
FA-TX-0002-0001 | FA-TX-0002-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Humphreys, Bradley Philip (District of Columbia)
FA-TX-0002-9000
Other Lawyers White, Edward L. III (Michigan)
FA-TX-0002-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -
The Clearinghouse has been generously supported by the National Science Foundation.