HOME
ABOUT THE CLEARINGHOUSE
SEARCH
QUESTIONS
RECENT ADDITIONS
suggest
doc/case
account
login
Case Profile
new search
page permalink
Case Name
United States v. Maricopa County
PN-AZ-0001
Docket / Court
2:12-cv-00981-LOA ( D. Ariz. )
State/Territory
Arizona
Case Type(s)
Policing
Case Summary
On May 10, 2012, the US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division (“DOJ), Special Litigation Section, filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 14141 (Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The DOJ filed the suit in the United States Court ...
read more >
On May 10, 2012, the US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division (“DOJ), Special Litigation Section, filed this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 14141 (Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The DOJ filed the suit in the United States Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix Division. The defendant is Maricopa County and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department. The United States is requesting injunctive and declaratory relief that Maricopa County engages in a pattern or practice that unconstitutionally discriminates against Latinos. Specifically, the United States is alleging that Maricopa’s police practices single out Latinos and fail to provide constitutionally required services for Latinos under Maricopa County’s control.
In September of 2010, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Maricopa County under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for the Sheriff’s Office’s failure to comply with an DOJ investigation into the targeting and unconstitutional treatment of Latinos (PN-AZ-2) (Docket #: 2:10-cv-01878). Maricopa County settled the lawsuit in June of 2011, and agreed to cooperate with the DOJ investigation.
On December 15, 2011, a findings letter reporting the result of the investigation was issued by the DOJ. The letter found that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) was engaged in an unconstitutional pattern of policing. The DOJ alleged that MSCO profiles Latinos, and unlawfully stops, detains, and arrests Latinos. The DOJ also found that services in the Maricopa County Jail for people of limited English proficiency are sub-par or nonexistent. The DOJ found that these problems are underscored by the lack of policy or procedure to ensure constitutional policing. This lawsuit followed.
This case is ongoing. As of this writing (5/15/12), the Defendants have yet to file an answer.
Blase Kearney - 05/14/2012
compress summary
- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Unconstitutional search and seizure
Discrimination-basis
Race discrimination
General
Failure to discipline
Failure to supervise
Failure to train
False arrest
Inadequate citizen complaint investigations and procedures
Racial profiling
Unconstitutional conditions of confinement
Plaintiff Type
U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff
Causes of Action
Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.
42 U.S.C. § 14141
Case Details
click to show/hide detail
Defendant(s)
Maricopa County
Plaintiff Description
The United States Department of Justice
Indexed Lawyer Organizations
U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division
Class action status sought
No
Class action status granted
No
Prevailing Party
not on record
Public Int. Lawyer
No
Nature of Relief
None yet
Source of Relief
None yet
Form of Settlement
Order Duration
not on record
Case Closing Year
n/a
Case Ongoing
Yes
Related Cases
click to show/hide detail
Case Listing
PN-AZ-0002
: United States v. Maricopa County (D. Ariz.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies
Panopticism for Police: Structural Reform Bargaining and Police Regulation by Data-Driven Surveillance
By: Mary D. Fan (University of Washington)
Citation: Forthcoming, 87 Washington L. Rev. __ (2012).
[ Detail ]
[ External Link ]
Documents
click to show/hide detail
Docket(s)
2:12-cv-00981-LOA
(D. Ariz.) 05/01/2013
PN-AZ-0001-9000
PDF
|
Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
United States' Investigation of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office
12/15/2011
PN-AZ-0001-0004
PDF
|
Detail
Complaint
05/10/2012
PN-AZ-0001-0001
PDF
|
Detail
Document Source: Bloomberg Law
People
click to show/hide detail
Judges
Anderson, Lawrence O.
(D. Ariz.) [Magistrate]
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Silver, Roslyn O.
(D. Ariz.)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Monitors/Masters
None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers
Austin, Roy L.
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Caspar, Edward G.
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-0001 | PN-AZ-0001-9000
Gayle, Winsome
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-0001 | PN-AZ-0001-9000
Mondino, Jennifer L.
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-0001 | PN-AZ-0001-9000
Perez, Sergio
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-0001 | PN-AZ-0001-9000
Perez, Thomas E.
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-0004 | PN-AZ-0001-9000
Smith, Jonathan Mark
(District of Columbia)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Defendant's Lawyers
Connolly, Joel E.
(Illinois)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Dysart, Robert L
(Arizona)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Jones, William R. Jr.
(Arizona)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Masterson, John T.
(Arizona)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Popolizio, Joseph John
(Arizona)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Voepel, Lori Lea
(Arizona)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Walker, Richard K
(Arizona)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Webb, Dan K.
(Illinois)
PN-AZ-0001-9000
Other Lawyers
None on record
- click to show/hide ALL -
new search
page permalink
- top of page -
Contact
Report an Error
Privacy Policy
The Clearinghouse has been generously supported by the
National Science Foundation
.