Case: Glik v. Cunniffe

Glick v. Cunniffe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

American Civil Liberties Union

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nancy Gertner assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin (Cummings, Mary) (Entered: 02/01/2010)

COMPLAINT against all defendants Filing fee: $ 350, receipt number 01010000000002763457, filed by Simon Glik. # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Sheet)(Friedman, Howard) (Entered: 02/01/2010)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

2 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

3 Category Sheet

View on PACER

Summons Issued as to John Cunniffe, Peter J. Savalis, [FNU] Hall-Brewster, City of Boston. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Cummings, Mary) (Entered: 02/01/2010)

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nancy Gertner assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin (Cummings, Mary)

NOTICE of Appearance by David Milton on behalf of Simon Glik (Milton, David) (Entered: 02/02/2010)

Judge Nancy Gertner: ORDER OF RECUSAL entered.(GAM) (Entered: 02/02/2010)

NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah R. Wunsch on behalf of Simon Glik (Wunsch, Sarah) (Entered: 02/02/2010)

Case Reassigned to Judge William G. Young. Judge Nancy Gertner no longer assigned to the case. (Cummings, Mary) (Entered: 02/03/2010)

Case Reassigned to Judge William G. Young. Judge Nancy Gertner no longer assigned to the case. (Cummings, Mary)

AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Simon Glik.(Friedman, Howard) (Entered: 02/05/2010)

NOTICE of Appearance by Ian D. Prior on behalf of City of Boston (Prior, Ian) (Entered: 02/11/2010)

NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa A. Skehill on behalf of City of Boston (Skehill, Lisa) (Entered: 03/05/2010)

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Simon Glik. City of Boston waiver sent on 2/8/2010, answer due 4/9/2010. (Friedman, Howard) (Entered: 03/10/2010)

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Simon Glik. Peter J. Savalis waiver sent on 2/8/2010, answer due 4/9/2010. (Friedman, Howard) (Entered: 03/10/2010)

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Simon Glik. John Cunniffe waiver sent on 2/8/2010, answer due 4/9/2010. (Friedman, Howard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/19/2010: # 1 Non-Fillable Waiver as to John Cunniffe) (Paine, Matthew). (Entered: 03/10/2010)

1 Non-Fillable Waiver as to John Cunniffe

View on RECAP

2 Non-Fillable Waiver as to John Cunniffe

View on PACER

MOTION for Extension of Time to April 23, 2010 to File Responsive Pleadings by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis.(Skehill, Lisa) (Entered: 03/30/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 23, 2010 to File Responsive Pleadings (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 03/31/2010)

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Simon Glik. Jerome Hall-Brewster waiver sent on 2/8/2010, answer due 4/23/2010. (Friedman, Howard) (Entered: 03/31/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 23, 2010 to File Responsive Pleadings (Paine, Matthew)

MOTION to Dismiss by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis.(Skehill, Lisa) (Entered: 04/22/2010)

MEMORANDUM in Support re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Skehill, Lisa) (Entered: 04/22/2010)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on RECAP

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion 14 MOTION to Dismiss : Motion Hearing set for 6/8/2010 02:00 PM in Courtroom 18 before Judge William G. Young. opposition is due by 5/6/10. Reply brief, if any, is due by 5/13/10(Smith, Bonnie) (Entered: 04/28/2010)

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion 14 MOTION to Dismiss : Motion Hearing set for 6/8/2010 02:00 PM in Courtroom 18 before Judge William G. Young. opposition is due by 5/6/10. Reply brief, if any, is due by 5/13/10(Smith, Bonnie)

Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 5/14/10 to File Response/Reply as to 14 MOTION to Dismiss by Simon Glik.(Milton, David) (Entered: 04/30/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 16 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 5/14/10 to File Response/Reply as to 14 MOTION to Dismiss Responses due by 5/14/2010 Replies due by 5/21/2010. (Smith, Bonnie) (Entered: 05/04/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 16 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 5/14/10 to File Response/Reply as to 14 MOTION to Dismiss Responses due by 5/14/2010 Replies due by 5/21/2010. (Smith, Bonnie)

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Simon Glik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Milton, David) (Entered: 05/14/2010)

1 Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge William G. Young: Motion Hearing held on 6/8/2010 re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jerome Hall−Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis ;The Court hears argument from the plaintiff and defendants. After hearing the Court rules denying 14 Motion to Dismiss; TheCourt holds a 16.1 conference and sets a schedule.( Final Pretrial Conference set for NO SOONER THAN 5/2/2011 02:00 PM before Judge William G. Young., Jury Trial set for RUNNING TRIAL LIST AS OF 6/6/2011 09:00 AM before Judge William G. Young.).The parties have 2 weeks to file a joint case management proposal. (Court Reporter: Donald Womack at womack@megatran.com.)(Attorneys present: Plaintiff's Counsel Milton, Freisman,Wunsch, Defendant's Counsel Skehill, Prior) (Smith, Bonnie) (Entered:

ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge William G. Young: Motion Hearing held on 6/8/2010 re 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis ;The Court hears argument from the plaintiff and defendants. After hearing the Court rules denying 14 Motion to Dismiss; TheCourt holds a 16.1 conference and sets a schedule.( Final Pretrial Conference set for NO SOONER THAN 5/2/2011 02:00 PM before Judge William G. Young., Jury Trial set for RUNNING TRIAL LIST AS OF 6/6/2011 09:00 AM before Judge William G. Young.).The parties have 2 weeks to file a joint case management proposal. (Court Reporter: Donald Womack at womack@megatran.com.)(Attorneys present: Plaintiff's Counsel Milton, Freisman,Wunsch, Defendant's Counsel Skehill, Prior) (Smith, Bonnie)

Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 8, 2010 to Answer Complaint by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis.(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 06/18/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 18 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 8, 2010 to Answer Complaint. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/21/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 18 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 8, 2010 to Answer Complaint. (Paine, Matthew)

JOINT STATEMENT of counsel regarding Case Management. (Milton, David) (Entered: 06/22/2010)

CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Milton, David) (Entered: 06/22/2010)

CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 . (Prior, Ian) (Entered: 06/22/2010)

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to Order on Motion to Dismiss, Motion Hearing, Set Hearings,,,,,,,,, by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis Fee Status: Y. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/clerks/transcript.htm MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/efiling.htm. Appeal Record due by 7/13/2010. (Skehill, Lisa) (Entered: 06/23/2010)

Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 22 Notice of Appeal, (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 06/23/2010)

USCA Case Number 10−1764 for 22 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jerome Hall−Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis. (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 06/24/2010)

USCA Case Number 10-1764 for 22 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis. (Ramos, Jeanette)

Filing fee/payment: $ 455.00, receipt number BST018061 for 22 Notice of Appeal, (Russo, Patricia) (Entered: 06/25/2010)

Filing fee/payment: $ 455.00, receipt number BST018061 for 22 Notice of Appeal, (Russo, Patricia)

MOTION to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Appeal by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis.(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 06/28/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying 24 MOTION to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Appeal (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/29/2010)

Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. Judge William G. Young no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are directed to the Court's Standing Orders re: Electronic Case Filing. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/29/2010)

CONSENT by all parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Simon Glik, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis.. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 06/29/2010)

Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying 24 MOTION to Stay District Court Proceedings Pending Appeal (Paine, Matthew)

Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. Judge William G. Young no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are directed to the Court's Standing Orders re: Electronic Case Filing. (Paine, Matthew)

TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM received from USCA and addressed to Donald Womack re 22 Notice of Appeal,,, Transcript order form filed in USCA on July 1, 2010. Transcript ordered: 6/8/10 Motion to Dismiss Hearing. Transcript due by 8/30/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 07/02/2010)

TRANSCRIPT ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM received from USCA and addressed to Donald Womack re 22 Notice of Appeal,,, Transcript order form filed in USCA on July 1, 2010. Transcript ordered: 6/8/10 Motion to Dismiss Hearing. Transcript due by 8/30/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah)

ANSWER to 6 Amended Complaint by City of Boston.(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 07/08/2010)

ANSWER to 6 Amended Complaint by Jerome Hall-Brewster.(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 07/08/2010)

ANSWER to 6 Amended Complaint by Peter J. Savalis.(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 07/08/2010)

ANSWER to 6 Amended Complaint by John Cunniffe.(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 07/08/2010)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. As suggested by the parties, the Court establishes the following dates to govern this litigation: Rule 26(a) disclosures by July 15, 2010, Initial written discovery by September 17, 2010, completion of all discovery by January 14, 2011, summary judgment motions, if any, filed by March 4, 2011 with oppositions by April 1, 2011, and replies, if any, not to exceed five pages, by April 15, 2010. The Court will hold a status conference in this case on January 18, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. In light of the parties' submissions to date, a formal scheduling conference appears unnecessary, however, if the parties believe such a conference, or a status conference generally, to be useful at this time either party may schedule such a conference now by contacting Ms. Simeone. ( Status Conference set for 1/18/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin., Discovery to be completed by 1/14/2011., Motions due by 3/4/2011.)(Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 07/12/2010)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. As suggested by the parties, the Court establishes the following dates to govern this litigation: Rule 26(a) disclosures by July 15, 2010, Initial written discovery by September 17, 2010, completion of all discovery by January 14, 2011, summary judgment motions, if any, filed by March 4, 2011 with oppositions by April 1, 2011, and replies, if any, not to exceed five pages, by April 15, 2010. The Court will hold a status conference in this case on January 18, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. In light of the parties' submissions to date, a formal scheduling conference appears unnecessary, however, if the parties believe such a conference, or a status conference generally, to be useful at this time either party may schedule such a conference now by contacting Ms. Simeone. ( Status Conference set for 1/18/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin., Discovery to be completed by 1/14/2011., Motions due by 3/4/2011.)(Simeone, Maria)

Transcript of Motion Hearing held on June 8, 2010, before Judge William G. Young. COA Case No. 10-1764. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Donald Womack at womack@megatran.com Redaction Request due 8/31/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/10/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/8/2010. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/10/2010)

NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, a copy of which is attached to this entry.. (Scalfani, Deborah) (Entered: 08/10/2010)

STIPULATION Re: Protective Order by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Prior, Ian) (Entered: 08/23/2010)

1 Exhibit

View on RECAP

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ALLOWED except that notwithstanding paragraph 6, the parties shall file a motion to seal any documents they wish to file with the Court under seal. re 32 Stipulation filed by Jerome Hall−Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 09/08/2010)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ALLOWED except that notwithstanding paragraph 6, the parties shall file a motion to seal any documents they wish to file with the Court under seal. re 32 Stipulation filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis (Simeone, Maria)

MOTION to Compel Police Reports by Simon Glik.(Milton, David) (Entered: 10/26/2010)

ORDER of USCA as to 22 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis. See Order for details. Order issued in the USCA 8/4/2010 (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 10/27/2010)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered; The Motion to Compel (Dkt#33) is ALLOWED AS UNOPPOSED. re 33 Motion to Compel; (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 11/23/2010)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered; The Motion to Compel (Dkt#33) is ALLOWED AS UNOPPOSED. re 33 Motion to Compel; (Simeone, Maria)

MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant City of Boston by Simon Glik.(Milton, David) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

MEMORANDUM in Support re 35 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant City of Boston filed by Simon Glik. (Milton, David) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

DECLARATION re 35 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant City of Boston by Simon Glik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Milton, David) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

1 Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 2

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit 3

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit 4

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit 5

View on RECAP

Opposition re 35 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant City of Boston filed by City of Boston. (Prior, Ian) (Entered: 12/21/2010)

Amended Opposition re 35 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant City of Boston filed by City of Boston. (Prior, Ian) (Entered: 12/21/2010)

Assented to MOTION for Leave to File a Reply by Simon Glik. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Reply, # 2 Exhibit to Proposed Reply)(Milton, David) (Entered: 12/23/2010)

1 Proposed Reply

View on PACER

2 Exhibit to Proposed Reply

View on PACER

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING the Plaintiff's Assented to Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include − Leave to file granted on (date of order)− in the caption of the document. (Chernetsky, James) (Entered: 12/29/2010)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docket # 35). As the City concedes, the suit against it was not stayed by the First Circuit. The City has failed to meet its burden to establish that the investigatory privilege precludes all of the discovery the Plaintiff seeks. The Motion to Compel (docket #35) is ALLOWED and the City shall produce the requested discovery within fourteen days, subject to the terms of this Order. Because the First Circuit has stayed the Plaintiffs case against the individual defendant officers, the Parties need not disclose, and prior to February 28, 2011, the Plaintiff shall not disclose to the other parties in the case the discovery which is the subject of this Order. If the City believes further protection is warranted, it shall file a motion with appropriate supporting documentation prior to February 28, 2011. (Chernetsky, James) (Entered: 12/29/2010)

REPLY to Response to 35 MOTION to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant City of Boston filed by Simon Glik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Milton, David) (Entered: 12/29/2010)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING the Plaintiff's Assented to Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Chernetsky, James)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Docket # 35). As the City concedes, the suit against it was not stayed by the First Circuit. The City has failed to meet its burden to establish that the investigatory privilege precludes all of the discovery the Plaintiff seeks. The Motion to Compel (docket #35) is ALLOWED and the City shall produce the requested discovery within fourteen days, subject to the terms of this Order. Because the First Circuit has stayed the Plaintiffs case against the individual defendant officers, the Parties need not disclose, and prior to February 28, 2011, the Plaintiff shall not disclose to the other parties in the case the discovery which is the subject of this Order. If the City believes further protection is warranted, it shall file a motion with appropriate supporting documentation prior to February 28, 2011. (Chernetsky, James)

ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: Status Conference held on 1/18/2011; Court hears counsel on the status of the case; Case is currently stayed; counsel discuss extending the deadlines for discovery past a decision by the 1st circuit; court requests counsel file a motion with requested dates and a status report re the decision when received; (Court Reporter: Digital Recording.) (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 01/19/2011)

ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: Status Conference held on 1/18/2011; Court hears counsel on the status of the case; Case is currently stayed; counsel discuss extending the deadlines for discovery past a decision by the 1st circuit; court requests counsel file a motion with requested dates and a status report re the decision when received; (Court Reporter: Digital Recording.) (Simeone, Maria)

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Simon Glik, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis.(Milton, David) (Entered: 01/24/2011)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 90 days after the decision of the circuit (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 01/27/2011)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 90 days after the decision of the circuit (Simeone, Maria)

Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered in case 1:10−cv−10150−LTS; denying (15) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:11−cv−11235−DPW Associated Cases: 1:11−cv−11235−DPW, 1:10−cv−10150−LTS(Woodlock, Douglas) (Entered: 08/18/2011)

Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered in case 1:10-cv-10150-LTS; denying (15) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:11-cv-11235-DPW Associated Cases: 1:11-cv-11235-DPW, 1:10-cv-10150-LTS(Woodlock, Douglas)

OPINION of USCA as to 22 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis. Opinion issued in the USCA 8/26/2011 (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 08/29/2011)

USCA Judgment as to 22 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis. This cause came on to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and was argued by counsel. Upon consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: The district court's order denying appellant's claim of qualified immunity is affirmed. Judgment issued in the USCA 8/26/2011 (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 08/29/2011)

STATUS REPORT and Defendants' Assented-To Motion to Extend Discovery by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis. (Maki, Lisa) (Entered: 09/12/2011)

MANDATE of USCA as to 22 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis. Appeal 22 Terminated. Mandate issued in the USCA 9/20/2011 (Ramos, Jeanette) (Entered: 09/21/2011)

NOTICE of Appearance by Raquel D. Ruano on behalf of City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis (Ruano, Raquel) (Entered: 09/30/2011)

MOTION to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery by City of Boston.(Maki, Lisa) (Entered: 10/05/2011)

MEMORANDUM in Support re 48 MOTION to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery filed by City of Boston. (Maki, Lisa) (Entered: 10/05/2011)

NOTICE by Simon Glik - Opposition to Plaintiff Max Strahan's Motion to Consolidate (Milton, David) (Entered: 10/11/2011)

NOTICE by City of Boston, John Cunniffe, Jerome Hall-Brewster, Peter J. Savalis of Opposition to Plaintiff, Richard Strahan's Motion to Consolidate (Maki, Lisa) (Entered: 10/11/2011)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Allowed; Discovery deadline extended to 3/29/12. re 45 Status Report filed by Jerome Hall−Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis, ( Discovery to be completed by 3/29/2012)(Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Allowed; Discovery deadline extended to 3/29/12. re 45 Status Report filed by Jerome Hall-Brewster, John Cunniffe, City of Boston, Peter J. Savalis, ( Discovery to be completed by 3/29/2012)(Simeone, Maria)

Opposition re 48 MOTION to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery filed by Simon Glik. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Milton, David) (Entered: 10/19/2011)

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The City of Boston may, no later than November 10, 2011, submit evidence to support its assertion that the internal affairs investigation at issue is ongoing and may submit a supplemental memo, not to exceed five pages; re 48 MOTION to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery filed by City of Boston (Entered: 11/01/2011)

Supplemental MEMORANDUM in Support re 48 MOTION to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery filed by City of Boston. (Ruano, Raquel) (Entered: 11/07/2011)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered; The Motion to Maintain Confidentiality (#48) is DENIED except regarding the personal identifying information which the parties have agreed to redact.re 48 Motion to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 11/08/2011)

Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered; The Motion to Maintain Confidentiality (#48) is DENIED except regarding the personal identifying information which the parties have agreed to redact.re 48 Motion to Maintain Confidentiality of Certain Documents Produced Through Discovery (Simeone, Maria)

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing; A. Status Conference has been set for 4/4/2012 03:30 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Simeone, Maria) (Entered: 01/10/2012)

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing; A. Status Conference has been set for 4/4/2012 03:30 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Simeone, Maria)