Filed Date: Nov. 3, 2009
Closed Date: 2010
Clearinghouse coding complete
On November 3, 2009, six Minnesota residents who qualify for payments under the Minnesota Supplemental Aid--Special Diet Program brought an action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the State of Minnesota in the District Court of Minnesota, Second Judicial District, Ramsey County. Plaintiffs challenged the validity of reductions made by the executive to unexpended allotments of funds appropriated for the Special Diet Program for the 2010-2011 biennium; July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2011. The Governor authorized the cuts to to avoid deficit spending.
Plaintiffs claim that the reductions in allotments to the Special Diet Program violate the terms of the "unallotment statute", Minn. Stat. § 16A.152, subd. 4, and are unconstitutional as a violation of separation of powers.
On December 30, 2009, the District Court of Minnesota (Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin) enjoined Defendants from reducing the allotment to the Special Diet Program, retroactive to November 1, 2009, until further order of the court.
The parties stipulated to an expedited appeal of the district court's decision. On May 5, 2010, in a published opinion, the Minnesota Supreme Court (Chief Justice Eric L. Magnuson) affirmed the district court's decision, but not on the separation of powers argument. Rather, the Court ruled that the Governor's allotment reductions since July 2009 were not authorized by the unallotment statute, Minn. Stat. § 16A.152, subd. 4, because they were taken before the legislative and executive branches had enacted a balanced budget. The reductions were therefore voided. Ramsey County v. Pawlenty, 781 N.W. 2d 357 (Minn. 2010).
Summary Authors
Xin Chen (6/29/2011)
Gearin, Kathleen (Minnesota)
Garry, John S. (Minnesota)
Gilbert, Alan I. (Minnesota)
Harrington, Jeffrey J. (Minnesota)
Carlson, Martin A. (Minnesota)
Gearin, Kathleen (Minnesota)
Magnuson, Eric J. (Minnesota)
Last updated Aug. 30, 2023, 2:25 p.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: Minnesota
Case Type(s):
Public Benefits/Government Services
Key Dates
Filing Date: Nov. 3, 2009
Closing Date: 2010
Case Ongoing: No
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Plaintiffs are participants in Minnesota's Special Diet Program whose benefitswerere terminated because of allotment reductions made by the state government.
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown
Filed Pro Se: No
Class Action Sought: No
Class Action Outcome: Not sought
Defendants
Governor of the State of Minnesota, State
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Source of Relief: