University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name ACORN v. United States FA-NY-0001
Docket / Court 1:09-cv-04888-NG -LB ( E.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Speech and Religious Freedom
Attorney Organization Center for Constitutional Rights
Case Summary
On November 12, 2009, The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the ACORN Institute, and the New York ACORN Housing Company filed filed a case in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York challenging Congress's defunding of the organization.

ACORN ... read more >
On November 12, 2009, The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the ACORN Institute, and the New York ACORN Housing Company filed filed a case in the District Court for the Eastern District of New York challenging Congress's defunding of the organization.

ACORN is a non-profit Arkansas Corporation headquartered in Brooklyn. It is dedicated to organizing and assisting low-income people through voter registration, home loan and foreclosure counseling, public housing and food stamp awareness, and other programs. The ACORN Institute, Inc. a non-profit corporation headquartered in New Orleans, and the New York ACORN Housing Company are not subsidiaries of ACORN but work closely with the nationwide organization. All three organizations collaborate with federal, state, and local governments and other institutions, and receive federal funding.



In September 2009, anti-ACORN activists posed as prostitute and pimp and secretly videotaped ACORN employees. The tapes purportedly showed employees giving the activists tax advice on running illegal businesses including sex trafficking. ACORN's complaint denied the allegations and said it fired the employees. In response to the video, Congress enacted specific prohibitions against funding ACORN in several "continuing resolutions," which Congress enacts when the new fiscal year is about to begin and they have not yet enacted a regular appropriations act.

These temporary acts authorized administrative agencies to distribute grants but contained an express condition forbidding grants to ACORN or any organization related to it. For example, Section 163 read: "None of the funds made available by this joint resolution or any prior Act may be provided to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now ("ACORN"), or any of ACORN'S affiliates, subsidiaries, or allied organizations."

The Office of Management and Budget issued a memo on October 7, 2009, warning all agency heads not to appropriate funds to ACORN and its affiliates in 2009 or 2010, even if the agency had already appropriated the funds to ACORN. The Department of Housing and Urban Development, in response, suspended funding to ACORN.

According to the complaint, the cryptic language of the appropriation's acts ("any of ACORN's affiliates, subsidiaries, or allied organizations") made ACORN a pariah. Banks, universities, and other organizations who had partnered with ACORN feared this broad language would bring them under congressional scrutiny as well. State agencies and private parties cancelled contracts. ACORN alleged the acts deprived it of grants and forced it to lay off up to 85 percent of its staff.



Plaintiffs allege that: (1) by singling out ACORN specifically, the appropriation acts were unconstitutional bills of attainder, violating Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution; (2) the acts violated ACORN's First Amendment rights and those of its past partners because the language "any affiliates, subsidiaries, or allied organizations" was vague and overbroad; and (3) the acts violated the Fifth Amendment because in dealing with ACORN the agencies did not follow due process procedures to withholding grants from criminal or fraudulent enterprises.

On November 13, 2009, the court (Judge Nina Gershon) denied plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order. However, on December 11, 2009, the court granted ACORN a preliminary injunction. Furthermore, on March 10, 2010, the court granted a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the appropriations acts were unconstitutional bills of attainder because the acts functioned as "punishment" which is a function reserved solely to the judicial branch. Deprivation of future funding opportunities, according to the court, was "punishment." The Court held that the remarks of Congress and the fact that there was no investigation of ACORN demonstrated congressional intent to punish.

The court issued a declaratory judgment that the appropriations acts were unconstitutional bills of attainder. The court also found that reputational injury to ACORN alone was enough to warrant a permanent injunction, which enjoined agency personnel from enforcing the conditions in the acts and ordered Director Orszag of the OMB to draft a new memorandum advising agencies that the acts were unenforceable.

The defendants moved to stay the injunction pending appeal, which motion the district court denied on March 31, 2010. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, (Judge Gerald Lynch), approved a temporary administrative stay on April 2, 2010. Then, a three judge panel consisting of Judges Roger Miner, Jose Cabranes, and Richard Wesley issued a stay of the declaratory judgment and the permanent injunction on April 21, 2010.



On August 13, 2010 the 2nd Circuit unanimously reversed the district court's decision on the Bill of Attainder victory. The court found ACORN had standing but no bill of attainder claims. They sent the case back to the District Court to look at First Amendment and Due Process violations.

Due to their struggles with their bankruptcy proceedings, the Plaintiffs agreed to dismissal of the case (with prejudice) on August 1, 2011.

Joshua Arocho - 06/18/2012


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Freedom of speech/association
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Defendant(s) United States of America
Plaintiff Description Non-profit community organization of low-and moderate income families
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Center for Constitutional Rights
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement Voluntary Dismissal
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing No
Docket(s)
Court of Appeals 10-992 (U.S. Court of Appeals) 05/05/2010
FA-NY-0001-9001.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
1:09-cv-04888-NG -LB (E.D.N.Y.) 08/03/2011
FA-NY-0001-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint 11/11/2009
FA-NY-0001-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Plaintiffs' counsel
Opinion and Order [Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction] 12/11/2009 (662 F.Supp.2d 285) (E.D.N.Y.)
FA-NY-0001-0003.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
First Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief 12/17/2009
FA-NY-0001-0002.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintffs' Motion to Modify or Amend the Preliminary Injunction 12/17/2009
FA-NY-0001-0004.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Federal Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Modify or Amend the Preliminary Injunction 12/18/2009
FA-NY-0001-0005.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion and Order [Granting Plaintiffs a Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Relief] 03/10/2010 (692 F.Supp.2d 260) (E.D.N.Y.)
FA-NY-0001-0006.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Press Release 03/10/2010
FA-NY-0001-0007.pdf | Detail
Document Source: Plaintiffs' counsel
Motion and Supporting Memorandum to Stay Declaratory Judgment and Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal, Or In Alternative, For A Temporary Administrative Stay . . . 03/17/2010
FA-NY-0001-0009.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [Denying Defendants' Motion for Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal] 03/31/2010 (E.D.N.Y.)
FA-NY-0001-0008.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
[Court of Appeals] Order [Granting Administrative Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal] 04/02/2010
FA-NY-0001-0010.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
[Court of Appeals] Order [Granting Stay of Declaratory Judgment and Injunction Pending Appeal] 04/21/2010
FA-NY-0001-0011.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion (Second Circuit Court of Appeals) 08/13/2010 (618 F.3d 125)
FA-NY-0001-0012.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Judgment Mandate (Second Circuit Court of Appeals) 12/17/2010
FA-NY-0001-0013.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Status Update to the Court 05/02/2011
FA-NY-0001-0014.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Untitled 07/08/2011 (E.D.N.Y.)
FA-NY-0001-0015.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 08/01/2011 (E.D.N.Y.)
FA-NY-0001-0016.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Bloom, Lois S. (E.D.N.Y.) [Magistrate]
FA-NY-0001-9000
Cabranes, Jose Alberto (Second Circuit, D. Conn., FISCR)
FA-NY-0001-0011 | FA-NY-0001-0012
Gershon, Nina (E.D.N.Y., S.D.N.Y.) [Magistrate]
FA-NY-0001-0003 | FA-NY-0001-0006 | FA-NY-0001-0008 | FA-NY-0001-0014 | FA-NY-0001-0015 | FA-NY-0001-0016 | FA-NY-0001-9000 | FA-NY-0001-9001
Lynch, Gerard E. (Second Circuit, S.D.N.Y.)
FA-NY-0001-0010
Miner, Roger Jeffrey (N.D.N.Y., Second Circuit)
FA-NY-0001-0011 | FA-NY-0001-0012
Wesley, Richard C. (State Appellate Court, State Trial Court, Second Circuit)
FA-NY-0001-0011 | FA-NY-0001-0012
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Charney, Darius (New York)
FA-NY-0001-0001 | FA-NY-0001-0002 | FA-NY-0001-0004 | FA-NY-0001-0014 | FA-NY-0001-0015 | FA-NY-0001-0016 | FA-NY-0001-9000 | FA-NY-0001-9001
Goodman, William Harry (Michigan)
FA-NY-0001-0001 | FA-NY-0001-0004 | FA-NY-0001-0016
Hurwitz, Julie H. (Michigan)
FA-NY-0001-0001 | FA-NY-0001-0004
Lobel, Jules L. (Pennsylvania)
FA-NY-0001-0001 | FA-NY-0001-0002 | FA-NY-0001-0004 | FA-NY-0001-0007 | FA-NY-0001-0016
Quigley, William (New York)
FA-NY-0001-0001 | FA-NY-0001-0002 | FA-NY-0001-0004
Schwartz, Arthur Z. (New York)
FA-NY-0001-0001 | FA-NY-0001-0004 | FA-NY-0001-0016
Defendant's Lawyers Amanat, F. Franklin (New York)
FA-NY-0001-0009 | FA-NY-0001-9000
Campbell, Benton J (New York)
FA-NY-0001-0009
Cohen, Bradley H. (District of Columbia)
FA-NY-0001-0005 | FA-NY-0001-0009 | FA-NY-0001-9000
Gershengorn, Ian Heath (District of Columbia)
FA-NY-0001-0009
Gilbert, Helen L (District of Columbia)
FA-NY-0001-9001
Leary, Peter D (District of Columbia)
FA-NY-0001-0005 | FA-NY-0001-0009 | FA-NY-0001-0014 | FA-NY-0001-0015 | FA-NY-0001-0016 | FA-NY-0001-9000
Lynch, Loretta (New York)
FA-NY-0001-0016
Sitcov, Michael (District of Columbia)
FA-NY-0001-0005 | FA-NY-0001-0009
West, Tony (District of Columbia)
FA-NY-0001-0009 | FA-NY-0001-0016
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -