University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name U.S. ex rel. Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York, Inc. v. Westchester Co. FH-NY-0012
Docket / Court 1:06-cv-02860-DLC ( S.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance
Attorney Organization Relman, Dane & Colfax
Case Summary
On April 12, 2006, the Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York ("ADC") filed this lawsuit under the False Claims Act against Westchester County in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. In False Claims Act cases, sometimes called "qui tam" actions, the private ... read more >
On April 12, 2006, the Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York ("ADC") filed this lawsuit under the False Claims Act against Westchester County in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. In False Claims Act cases, sometimes called "qui tam" actions, the private instigator of the case is called the "relator"; the plaintiff is technically the United States, and the relator seeks damages because of harm caused to the United States; by statute, those damages go mostly the federal government with the relator keeping a share. Represented by the law firm Relman & Dane, ADC asked the Court for monetary and injunctive relief, claiming that Westchester County, in violation of the False Claims Act, falsely certified that it was in compliance with certain provisions of the Fair Housing and Community Development Acts, resulting in over $45 million in damages to the United States. As normally occurs in False Claims Act cases, the complaint was filed under seal, to give the U.S. time to review it and decide whether to join in the litigation. This was the first case ever in which fair housing litigation was conducted via a False Claims Act case. The U.S. initially declined to intervene, and the complaint was unsealed and served on Westchester in January 2007.

ADC claimed that between 2000 and 2006, the County falsely certified that the County had affirmatively furthered fair housing. The suit alleged that the County failed to analyze impediments to fair housing choice based on race or municipal resistance, and chose not to take appropriate steps to overcome such impediments.

The County moved to dismiss, but the Court (Judge Denise L. Cote) rejected that motion in July 2007. 495 F.Supp.2d 375 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). After discovery, in February 2009, Judge Cote granted partial summary judgment for ADC, 668 F.Supp.2d 548 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). The Court found that the County had not analyzed the racial impact of various practices as it claimed it had, and had thereby submitted false certifications to the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). Since the County had submitted false certifications to receive approximately $52 million from HUD, it was liable for over $150 million in damages pursuant to the treble damages provision of the FCA. A trial was scheduled to determine whether the violation had been willful.

In April 2009 (under the new Obama administration) the U.S. changed its mind as to intervention. It intervened and elected to proceed with this action, filing its own complaint on August 10, 2009. The Government's complaint alleged violations of the FCA and of the Housing and Community Development Act. Simultaneously, the Government submitted an executed settlement of the litigation, agreeable to all parties. Under the settlement, the County agreed to spend $52 million to develop new affordable housing in white municipalities of the County, and also to pay $7.5 million as a relator's share to the ADC, and $2.5 million in attorney's fees.

In addition, the settlement required Westchester to: 1) adopt as its policy the elimination of residential segregation, and to implement the settlement in a way that develops housing on those Census blocks that currently have the lowest concentrations of African‐Americans and Latinos, 2) take legal action against resistant municipalities where needed to fulfill the affirmatively furthering fair housing purposes of the settlement, and 3) conduct a new analysis of impediments to fair housing choice that examines barriers based on race or on municipal resistance. The agreement included penalty provisions for non‐compliance. In addition, performance of the obligations was to be done by an independent monitor, and the parties agreed that the Court would retain jurisdiction over the case.

On July 13, 2011, HUD notified the County that it had failed to meet a consent decree requirement when the County Executive vetoed legislation to incorporate corrective actions which promote source-of-income legislation and plans to overcome exclusionary zoning practices. On November 17, 2011, the Monitor submitted a report stating that Defendant breached its obligation in the consent decree. The County formally objected this determination to Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on December 7, 2011. Magistrate Judge Gorenstein sustained the County's objection, concluding that it did not violate its duty to promote source-of-income legislation. The U.S. then filed an objection with the district court, seeking review of the Magistrate Judge's decision.

On May 3, 2012, the District Court Judge Cote overruled the Magistrate Judge's opinion, and adopted all sections of the Monitor's original report. 2012 WL 1574819 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). On May 15, 2012, the County filed a Notice of Appeal with the United States Court of Appeals. Defendant moved for a stay during appeal, but Judge Cote denied that motion on May 17, 2012. On May 29, 2013, the Court of Appeals (Judge Rosemary S. Pooler) affirmed the District Court decision, agreeing that the defendant violated the terms of the consent decree, and allowing the full adoption of the Monitor's Report. 712 F.3d 761 (2nd Cir. 2013).

This case is still ongoing and the monitor continues to file reports regarding compliance with the consent decree.

Dan Osher - 06/28/2013
Asma Husain - 02/14/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Content of Injunction
Auditing
Comply with advertising/recruiting requirements
Develop anti-discrimination policy
Discrimination Prohibition
Goals and Timekeeping
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Monitor/Master
Recordkeeping
Discrimination-area
Housing Sales/Rental
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
Race discrimination
General
Disparate Impact
Funding
Housing
Housing assistance
Racial segregation
National Origin/Ethnicity
Hispanic
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff
Race
Black
Causes of Action Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.
Defendant(s) Westchester County
Plaintiff Description Anti-Discrimination Center of New York, in the interest of minorities who are unable to obtain affordable housing in predominantly white communities in Westchester County. Since this is a "qui tam" action, ADC appears in the stead of the United States, which was the victim of the alleged false claims at issue in the case.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Relman, Dane & Colfax
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 2009 - n/a
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Insurer Must Pay $100.5 Million in Redlining Case
The New York Times
Written: Oct. 27, 1998
By: Joseph B. Treaster
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Nationwide Settles Virginia Redlining Suit
Property Casualty 360
Written: May. 06, 2000
By: Amanda Levin
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Overcoming Structural Barriers to Integrated Housing: A Back-to-the-Future Reflection on the Fair Housing Act's "Affirmatively Further" Mandate
By: Robert G. Schwemm (University of Kentucky)
Citation: 100 Ky. L.J. 125 (2011-2012)
[ Detail ]

  The Origins of Fair Lending Litigation
Written: Dec. 04, 2008
By: Andrew Nash (Washington University in St. Louis)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:06−cv−02860 (S.D.N.Y.) 01/22/2016
FH-NY-0012-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Anti-Discrimination Center Wins Unprecedented $62.5 Million Settlement In Housing De-Segregation Case Against Westchester County
FH-NY-0012-0001.pdf | Detail
False Claims Act Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial 04/12/2006
FH-NY-0012-0007.pdf | Detail
Opinion and Order 07/13/2007 (495 F.Supp.2d 375) (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0004.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion of Summary Judgment 09/30/2008
FH-NY-0012-0008.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion For Partial Summary Judgment 10/17/2008
FH-NY-0012-0005.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion & Order 02/24/2009 (668 F.Supp.2d 548) (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0006.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum Opinion and Order 04/09/2009 (2009 WL 970866) (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0003.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Opinion and Order 04/24/2009 (2009 WL 1108517) (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal 08/10/2009
FH-NY-0012-0009.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion and Order 03/16/2012 (2012 WL 917367 / 2012 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 36017) (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0011.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
OPINION & ORDER 05/03/2012 (2012 WL 1574819 / 2012 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 62424) (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0010.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion 04/05/2013 (712 F.3d 761)
FH-NY-0012-0012.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Letter to Judge Denise Cote from Craig Gurian 04/17/2014
FH-NY-0012-0013.pdf | Detail
Judges Cote, Denise (S.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0002 | FH-NY-0012-0003 | FH-NY-0012-0004 | FH-NY-0012-0006 | FH-NY-0012-0009 | FH-NY-0012-0010 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Gorenstein, Gabriel W. (S.D.N.Y.) [Magistrate]
FH-NY-0012-0011 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Pooler, Rosemary S. (Second Circuit, N.D.N.Y.)
FH-NY-0012-0012
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Allen, Michael Gerhart (District of Columbia)
FH-NY-0012-0005 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Cenawood, Sean Chance (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Cott, James (New York)
FH-NY-0012-0009 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Dane, Stephen M. (District of Columbia)
FH-NY-0012-0005 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Eshkenazi, Lara K. (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Flannery, John Martin (Connecticut)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Gurian, Craig (New York)
FH-NY-0012-0007 | FH-NY-0012-0013 | FH-NY-0012-9000 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Kennedy, David J. (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Relman, John Peter (District of Columbia)
FH-NY-0012-0005 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Stroup, Robert H (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Torrance, Benjamin H. (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Yankwitt, Russel Marc (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Adin, Justin Richard (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Alesio, Lori Ann (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Arcuri, Carol F. (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Brady, Shannon Sarles (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Cardoso, Denise Marieiro (California)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Cardoso, Anthony Francisco (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Castro-Blanco, James Francis (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Corcoran, Carrie (New York)
FH-NY-0012-0008 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Gerson, Stuart M. (District of Columbia)
FH-NY-0012-0008 | FH-NY-0012-0009 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Kalish, Michael A. (New York)
FH-NY-0012-0008 | FH-NY-0012-9000
Meehan, Robert F (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Miklave, Matthew Thaddeus (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Rodriguez, Adam (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Rotini, Melissa-Jean (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Sokoloff, Brian S. (New York)
FH-NY-0012-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -