Case: McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.

1:01-cv-00510 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 9, 2001

Closed Date: 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 9, 2001, a group of African-American employees filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc. in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the Court for injunctive relief and damages alleging discrimination in promotion practices. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that Sodexho discriminated agains…

On March 9, 2001, a group of African-American employees filed suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc. in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the Court for injunctive relief and damages alleging discrimination in promotion practices. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that Sodexho discriminated against African-Americans in managerial, salaried positions, relying on both the disparate treatment and disparate impact theories.

The plaintiffs asserted that most of the managerial slots were filled without the jobs ever being posted. Further, when jobs were posted, pre-selection occurred that disadvantaged African-Americans because the decision-makers were primarily white. The plaintiffs also asserted that, when there was competition for a managerial position, these decision-makers had unfettered discretion in making their decision because they were not given job-related or objective criteria. Since there was no required documentation explaining their reasons, the decisions were un-reviewable. McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc., 349 F.Supp.2d 6 (D.D.C. 2004).

On June 27, 2002, the Court (Judge Ellen S. Huvelle) granted class certification as to liability but not damages. McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc., 208 F.R.D. 449 (D.D.C. 2004). The parties then engaged in almost two years of heated discovery.

On December 20, 2004, the Court handed down two orders. The first was an order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment except with respect to the plaintiffs' disparate impact claim, which the court dismissed with prejudice. According to the Court, given the inconsistencies in Sodexho's own evidence, and in light of the substantial testimony offered by plaintiffs, the Court must, for summary judgment purposes, credit plaintiffs' contention that Sodexho used a decentralized, subjective promotions process. McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc., 349 F.Supp.2d 20 (D.D.C. 2004).

The Court's decision to dismiss the disparate impact claim was in part to do with the second order handed down that day: also on December 20, 2004, the Court denied the defendant's motion to strike the plaintiff's expert testimony. The plaintiffs brought on a statistics expert to compute the promoting rates of the class members, and the defense likewise hired a similar expert. The expert opinions differed concerning their analysis of the promoting rate, and the defense moved to strike the plaintiff's expert testimony. The Court did not rule which testimony was the correct one, ruling instead that both met the minimum requirements for admissible testimony. McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc., 349 F.Supp.2d 34 (D.D.C. 2004).

On May 2, 2005, the two sides reached a settlement. The settlement yielded up to a potential $80 million for those who claimed class status. As part of the settlement, the company also continued its diversity programs training. After a minor battle over attorney fees, the Court approved over $21 million in attorney fees and another $2 million in costs. The case was closed on September 7, 2006.

Summary Authors

Matthew Aibel (4/20/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11891404/parties/mcreynolds-v-sodexho-marriott/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Becton, Nicole Jelani (District of Columbia)

Boston, Sheila S. (New York)

Bush, T. Melindah (District of Columbia)

Cousineau, David Laurent (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Ashe, R. Lawrence Jr. (Georgia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:01-cv-00510

Docket

Sept. 7, 2006

Sept. 7, 2006

Docket
56

1:01-cv-00510

Opinion and Order (granting plaintiffs' motion for class certification as to liability)

June 25, 2002

June 25, 2002

Order/Opinion

208 F.R.D. 428

190

1:01-cv-00510

Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment As To Classwide Liability

April 1, 2004

April 1, 2004

Pleading / Motion / Brief
211

1:01-cv-00510

Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment As To Classwide Liability

May 4, 2004

May 4, 2004

Pleading / Motion / Brief
238

1:01-cv-00510

Opinion and Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (except that plaintiffs' disparate impact claim is dismissed with prejudice)

Dec. 20, 2004

Dec. 20, 2004

Order/Opinion

349 F.Supp.2d 1

1:01-cv-00510

Opinion and Order (denying defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs' statistical expert)

Dec. 20, 2004

Dec. 20, 2004

Order/Opinion

349 F.Supp.2d 30

307-3

1:01-cv-00510

Settlement Agreement and Consent Decree

May 2, 2005

May 2, 2005

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11891404/mcreynolds-v-sodexho-marriott/

Last updated July 22, 2026, 5:13 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 12, 2001

CLASS COMPLAINT filed by plaintiff CYNTHIA CARTER MCREYNOLDS, plaintiff LISA MITCHELL, plaintiff ROBERT MORRIS JR., plaintiff CHIP MOSS, plaintiff MARILYN MCNISH, plaintiff EZZIE L. HENRY, plaintiff DWAIN P. RICHARDSON, plaintiff TARSHA ANN HARDY, plaintiff GAIL L. DARLINGTON, plaintiff SAMUEL COKES; jury demand; exhibit (1) (tb) Modified on 03/13/2001 (Entered: 03/13/2001)

RECAP
2 March 12, 2001

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of summons and complaint executed on 3/9/01 upon defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT (tb) (Entered: 03/13/2001)

RECAP
March 12, 2001

SUMMONS (1) issued for defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT (tb)

3 March 29, 2001

MOTION filed by plaintiff CYNTHIA CARTER MCREYNOLDS, plaintiff LISA MITCHELL, plaintiff ROBERT MORRIS JR., plaintiff CHIP MOSS, plaintiff MARILYN MCNISH, plaintiff EZZIE L. HENRY, plaintiff DWAIN P. RICHARDSON, plaintiff TARSHA ANN HARDY, plaintiff GAIL L. DARLINGTON, plaintiff SAMUEL COKES to waive 90-day time limit to file motion for class certification (cas) (Entered: 03/30/2001)

RECAP
4 March 29, 2001

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT [1-1] by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT. (ag) (Entered: 03/30/2001)

RECAP
7 March 29, 2001

LCvR 26.1 Certificate of disclosure of corporate affiliations and financial interests by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT (ag) (Entered: 04/03/2001)

RECAP
5 April 2, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting motion to waive 90-day time limit to file motion for class certification [3-1] by plaintiffs (N) (gdf) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

RECAP
6 April 2, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle Meet Confer hearing set for 10:30 4/27/01 . (N) (gdf) (Entered: 04/02/2001)

RECAP
8 April 19, 2001

JOINT DISCOVERY PLANNING CONFERENCE REPORT CONFERENCE REPORT by plaintiffs and defendants (bjsp) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

RECAP
9 April 25, 2001

BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE CASE by plaintiffs; exhibits (2) (bjsp) (Entered: 04/27/2001)

RECAP
April 27, 2001

MEET AND CONFER STATUS HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: order to be presented by counsel. Reporter: Jon Hundley, Miller Reporting (gdf)

10 April 30, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle that joinder of additional parties and amendment of the pleading shall be done by 6/08/01;motion due 8/20/01 ; response to motion due 9/17/01 ; reply to motion due 10/1/01; (N) (see order for detail) (gdf) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

RECAP
11 May 22, 2001

MOTION filed by plaintiffs to limit defendant's contact with putative class members (ag) (Entered: 05/23/2001)

RECAP
14 May 24, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: denying motion to limit plaintiffs' counsel's contact with putative class members [13-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT, denying motion to limit defendant's contact with putative class members [11-1] by plaintiffs (N) (gdf) (Entered: 05/30/2001)

RECAP
May 24, 2001

STATUS HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: denying both plaintiff and defendant's motions. Order to be presented. Reporter: Monica Mazzeo (gdf)

12 May 25, 2001

RESPONSE by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in opposition to motion to limit defendant's contact with putative class members [11-1] by plaintiffs. (ag) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

RECAP
13 May 25, 2001

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to limit plaintiffs' counsel's contact with putative class members ; Exhibits (1) (ag) (Entered: 05/29/2001)

RECAP
15 July 16, 2001

MOTION filed by plaintiff to compel the production of email and other documents that discuss or refer to this lawsuit ; Exhibits (6) (ag) (Entered: 07/17/2001)

RECAP
16 July 26, 2001

JOINT MOTION by plaintiffs and defendants for the Court to amend the 4/30/01 order that joinder of additional parties and amendment of the pleading shall be done by 6/08/01;motion due 8/20/01 ; response to motion due 9/17/01 ; reply to motion due 10/1/01; [10-1], order [10-2] (bjsp) (Entered: 07/27/2001)

RECAP
17 July 27, 2001

RESPONSE by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in opposition to motion to compel the production of email and other documents that discuss or refer to this lawsuit [15-1] by plaintiff's; exhibit's (3) (cas) (Entered: 07/30/2001)

RECAP
18 July 31, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: granting joint motion for the Court to amend the 4/30/01 order that joinder of additional parties and amendment of the pleading shall be done by 6/08/01; [10-1], order [10-2] [16-1] by defendant, plaintiff (N) (see order for detail) (gdf) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

RECAP
19 Aug. 3, 2001

REPLY by plaintiff in support of motion to compel the production of email and other documents that discuss or refer to this lawsuit [15-1] by plaintiffs; Declarations (1); Exhibits (16) (ag) (Entered: 08/06/2001)

RECAP
Aug. 7, 2001

MOTION HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: motion to compel granted/denied in part. Tele-conference set for 10:00 8/15/01 Reporter: Jon Hundley, Miller (gdf)

20 Aug. 8, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting in part, denying in part motion to compel the production of email and other documents that discuss or refer to this lawsuit [15-1] Tele-conference set for 10:00 8/15/01 (N) (gdf) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

RECAP
21 Aug. 14, 2001

TRANSCRIPT of a Motion Hearing filed for date(s) of 8/7/01. Reporter: Jon Hundley (ag) (Entered: 08/15/2001)

RECAP
22 Aug. 14, 2001

STATEMENT filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT, regarding: estimated costs of e-mail discovery for purposes of conference call with opposing counsel and judge; exhibit (1) (cjp) (Entered: 08/15/2001)

RECAP
23 Aug. 15, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: that the out of pocket cost up to $29,231.70 for discovery of e-mails relating to the motion for class certification shall be split equally between defendant and plaintiffs. Defendant shall bear the cost of attorney time for privilege review of these documents, as well as any out of pocket costs in excess of $29,231.70. This order shall be subject to reconsideration in the event that the e-mails from corporate headquarters cannot be reviewed as a result of defendant's destruction of the backup tapes (N) (gdf) (Entered: 08/17/2001)

RECAP
24 Oct. 9, 2001

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT for George W. Johnston to appear pro hac vice (VENABLE, BAETJER AND HOWARD, LLP, 1800 Mercantile Bank & Trust Bldg., Two Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, MD 21201, (410) 244-7400) (nmr) (Entered: 10/10/2001)

RECAP
25 Oct. 10, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting motion for George W. Johnston to appear pro hac vice (VENABLE, BAETJER AND HOWARD, LLP, 1800 Mercantile Bank & Trust Bldg., Two Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, MD 21201, (410) 244-7400) [24-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT (N) (gdf) (Entered: 10/12/2001)

RECAP
26 Oct. 16, 2001

REQUEST by plaintiff for conference call with the court regarding defendant's failure to produce responsive emails ; attachments (3) (nmr) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

RECAP
27 Oct. 17, 2001

RESPONSE (OPPOSITIONS) by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to request for conference call with the court regarding defendant's failure to produce responsive emails [26-1] by plaintiffs; exhibits (3). (nmr) (Entered: 10/18/2001)

RECAP
28 Oct. 22, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: Referring all discovery to Magistrate Judge Kay (N) (gdf) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
29 Oct. 22, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: granting request for conference call with the court regarding defendant's failure to produce responsive emails [26-1] by plaintiffs; counsel shall meet before 10/31/01, to resolve any issues surrounding the use and development of the e-mail database; that defendant must produce to plaintiffs by 10/31/01, a privilege log of all documents withheld up to that date (N) (See order for detail) (gdf) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

RECAP
Oct. 22, 2001

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay for discovery dispute (mmh)

30 Oct. 29, 2001

MOTION filed by plaintiff to extend time of the cut-off for expert class discover to 11/7/01 (nmr) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

RECAP
31 Oct. 31, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting motion to extend time of the cut-off for expert class discover to 11/7/01 [30-1] by plaintiffs; Discovery now closes 11/7/01 (N) (pob) (Entered: 10/31/2001)

RECAP
32 Nov. 7, 2001

JOINT MOTION by plaintiffs, defendant for amended class certification scheduling order (nmr) (Entered: 11/08/2001)

RECAP
33 Nov. 8, 2001

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting joint motion for amended class certification scheduling order [32-1] by defendant, plaintiff motion for class certification due 12/7/01 ; response to motion due 1/18/02 ; reply to motion due 2/15/02 (N) (rew) (Entered: 11/09/2001)

RECAP
Dec. 1, 2001

CASE referral ended as to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay. (kk)

34 Dec. 7, 2001

MOTION filed by plaintiffs for class certification ; exhibits (APPENDIX VOLUMES I AND II 1THRU96) (cas) (Entered: 12/10/2001)

RECAP
35 Jan. 8, 2002

MOTION filed by plaintiff to compel production of documents withheld on asserted groundss of privilege ; exhibits (14) (cas) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

RECAP
36 Jan. 9, 2002

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: referring discovery to Magistrate Judge Kay (N) (gdf) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

RECAP
37 Jan. 9, 2002

MOTION (CORRECTED) filed by plaintiffs to compel production of documents witheld on asserted grounds of privilege (cas) (Entered: 01/10/2002)

RECAP
Jan. 9, 2002

CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay for discovery disputes (mmh)

38 Jan. 10, 2002

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to extend time to 1/29/02 to respond to motion to compel ; exhibits (3) (cas) (Entered: 01/11/2002)

RECAP
39 Jan. 14, 2002

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in opposition to motion to extend time to 1/29/02 to respond to motion to compel [38-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; exhibits (10) (cas) (Entered: 01/15/2002)

RECAP
40 Jan. 15, 2002

REPLY by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to response in opposition to their motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion to compel; Exhibit (1). (ks) Modified on 01/31/2002 (Entered: 01/31/2002)

RECAP
41 Jan. 18, 2002

MEMORANDUM ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay : granting motion by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to extend time to 1/29/02 to respond to motion to compel [38-1]; defendant's response to plaintiffs' motion to compel due by 1/29/02 (N) (kk) (Entered: 01/18/2002)

RECAP
42 Jan. 18, 2002

RESPONSE by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in opposition to motion for class certification [34-1] by plaintiffs; Exhibits (62). (nmr) (Entered: 01/22/2002)

RECAP
43 Jan. 29, 2002

RESPONSE by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in opposition to motion to compel production of documents witheld on grounds of privilege [37-1] by plaintiffs; Attachments (3). (nmr) (Entered: 01/30/2002)

RECAP
44 Feb. 5, 2002

REPLY by plaintiff to response in opposition to motion to compel production of documents witheld on asserted grounds of privilege [37-1] by plaintiffs; Exhibits (4) (nmr) (Entered: 02/06/2002)

RECAP
45 Feb. 8, 2002

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay : deferring plaintiffs' corrected motion to compel production of documents withheld on asserted grounds of privilege [37-1] until after the Court reviews the documents in camera ; directing that said documents be delivered to the Court within 7 days from the date of receipt of this order (N) (kk) (Entered: 02/08/2002)

RECAP
46 Feb. 14, 2002

RESPONSE by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to the Courts 2/7/02 order for defendant to submit identified documents to the Court for an in camera review and corrected declaration of J. Victor Waye, ESQ [45-3]; exhibit (1) (bjsp) (Entered: 02/15/2002)

RECAP
47 Feb. 15, 2002

REPLY by plaintiff to response in opposition to motion for class certification [34-1] by plaintiffs; Exhibits (44) (nmr) (Entered: 02/19/2002)

RECAP
48 March 11, 2002

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT for leave to file surreply memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification ; EXHIBIT (SURREPLY) (nmr) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

RECAP
49 March 21, 2002

RESPONSE by plaintiffs in opposition to motion for leave to file surreply memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification [48-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Exhibits (5). (nmr) (Entered: 03/22/2002)

RECAP
50 April 1, 2002

REPLY by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to response in opposition to motion for leave to file surreply memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification [48-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Attachment (1) (nmr) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

RECAP
51 April 3, 2002

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting motion for leave to file surreply memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification [48-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT (N) (gdf) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

RECAP
54 April 3, 2002

SURREPLY by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to motion for class certification [34-1] by plaintiffs; Exhibits (4) (nmr) (Entered: 04/10/2002)

RECAP
52 April 10, 2002

MEMORANDUM OPINION by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay (N) (kk) (Entered: 04/10/2002)

RECAP
53 April 10, 2002

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay : granting in part and denying in part, plaintiffs' corrected motion to compel production of documents witheld on asserted grounds of privilege [37-1]; directing that within 10 days from the date of receipt of this order, the defendant shall produce documents numbered 1 (may redact handwritten notes), 39, 43-45, 48-51, 190, 191, 276, 277, 326, 363, 367, 376, 454-456, 493, 512, 513 (may redact handwritten notes), 519, 520, 609-611, 629, 630-633, 636-639, 643-646, 652, 658-660, 672, 673 and 689 ; directing that documents numbered 2, 155, 253-258, 263, 492, 517, 518, 544, 545, 641, 642, 650, 664-669, 674, 682, 683, 687, 688 and 690 are privileged or protected, and need not be produced (N) (kk) (Entered: 04/10/2002)

RECAP
55 June 25, 2002

MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle (N) (gdf) (Entered: 06/27/2002)

RECAP
56 June 25, 2002

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : granting motion for class certification [34-1] by plaintiffsssssssss status hearing set for 9:45 7/12/02 ; (N) (gdf) (Entered: 06/27/2002)

RECAP
57 July 8, 2002

PROPOSED SCHEDULE plans by plaintiffs, defendant (bcs) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

RECAP
July 12, 2002

STATUS HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: Reporter: Jon Hundley, Miller (gdf)

Oct. 1, 2002

STATUS HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle : status hearing set for 11:00 12/2/02 ; Reporter: Ed Hawkins (jf)

58 Oct. 28, 2002

TRANSCRIPT filed of status conference before Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle for date(s) of 10/1/02. Reporter: Edward N. Hawkins (nmr) (Entered: 10/29/2002)

RECAP
59 Nov. 25, 2002

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to Order dated 10/1/02 directing the filing of a proposed discovery plan. (nmr) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

RECAP
Dec. 2, 2002

STATUS HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: Status hearing set for 9:30 a.m. on 1/9/03 ; Reporter: Santa Zizzo (gdf)

60 Dec. 3, 2002

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle discovery closes 12/1/03; Status hearing set for 9:30 a.m. on 1/9/03 and further Status set for 12:00 p.m. on 12/15/03 ;, referring discovery diputes to Magistrate Judge Kay (N) (gdf) (Entered: 12/04/2002)

RECAP
Dec. 3, 2002

CASE RE-REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Alan Kay for discovery disputes (cp)

61 Dec. 6, 2002

TRANSCRIPT filed of status conference before Judge Huvelle for date(s) of 12/2/02. Reporter: Santa Zizzo (nmr) (Entered: 12/09/2002)

RECAP
62 Dec. 18, 2002

SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle discovery closes 12/1/03 ; referring discovery dispute to Magistrate Judge Kay (N) (gdf) (Entered: 12/19/2002)

RECAP
Jan. 9, 2003

STATUS HEARING before Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: Status hearing set for 2:00 p.m. on 5/16/03 Reporter: Jackie Wood, Miller Reporter (gdf)

63 Jan. 14, 2003

ORDER by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle: that salaried African-American employees who were not employed by Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc. at any time between March 27, 1998 and July 1, 2001 are members of the class certified by this Court on June 27, 2002; for the purposes of determining liability in this case, promotion decisions that occured after June 22, 2001 shall not be considered (N) (gdf) (Entered: 01/15/2003)

RECAP
64 Feb. 3, 2003

TRANSCRIPT filed for status hearing date(s) of 1/9/03. Reporter: Jacqueline L. Wood, Miller Reporting Company (bcs) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

RECAP
65 Feb. 6, 2003

MOTION filed by plaintiffs to quash suboenas served on third parties ; exhibits (3) (bcs) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
66 Feb. 19, 2003

RESPONSE by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in opposition to motion to quash suboenas served on third parties [65-1] by plaintiffs; Exhibits (11). (nmr) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

RECAP
68 Feb. 26, 2003

COPY of Order filed in USCA dated 02/25/03, referencing, directing the petition for leave to appeal is denied. USCA # 02-8008 (cp) (Entered: 03/06/2003)

RECAP
67 March 3, 2003

REPLY by plaintiffs in support of motion to quash suboenas served on third parties [65-1] by plaintiffs; Exhibits (17) (nmr) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

RECAP
69 March 12, 2003

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to increase the number of depositions and to permit defendant to have ex parte conversations with seven class members who were involved in decisions challenged by other class members ; Exhibits (2) (nmr) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

RECAP
70 March 21, 2003

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in support of motion to increase the number of depositions [69-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Attachment (1). (ks) (Entered: 03/25/2003)

RECAP
71 March 26, 2003

RESPONSE by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to increase the number of depositions and to permit defendant to have ex parte conversations with seven class members who were involved in decisions challenged by other class members [69-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Exhibits (16). (nmr) (Entered: 03/27/2003)

RECAP
72 April 2, 2003

REPLY by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to response in opposition to motion to increase the number of depositions and to permit defendant to have ex parte conversations with seven class members who were involved in decisions challenged by other class members [69-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Exhibits (4) (nmr) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

RECAP
73 April 4, 2003

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to increase the number of depositions [69-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Exhibits (4) (nmr) (Entered: 04/07/2003)

RECAP
74 April 8, 2003

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to compel answers to interrogatories and request for production of documents ; Exhibits (5) (nmr) (Entered: 04/09/2003)

RECAP
75 April 11, 2003

MEMORANDUM OPINION by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay (N) (kk) (Entered: 04/11/2003)

RECAP
76 April 11, 2003

REPLY by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to opposition to supplemental memorandum in support of defendant's motion to increase the number of depositions [73-1] by plaintiffs. (nmr) (Entered: 04/14/2003)

RECAP
77 April 14, 2003

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alan Kay : granting in part and denying in part, motion by plaintiffs to quash subpoenas served on third parties [65-1] (N) (kk) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

RECAP
78 April 17, 2003

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to compel the deposition of plaintiff William Snell ; Exhibits (6) (nmr) (Entered: 04/18/2003)

RECAP
79 April 18, 2003

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to increase the number of depositions and to permit defendant to have ex parte conversations with seven class members who were involved in decisions challenged by other class members [69-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; exhibits (2) (bcs) (Entered: 04/21/2003)

RECAP
80 April 21, 2003

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT for protective order to preclude the deposition of Pierre Bellon ; Exhibits (5) (nmr) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

RECAP
81 April 21, 2003

RESPONSE by plaintiffs in opposition to motion to compel answers to interrogatories and request for production of documents [74-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Exhibits (24). (nmr) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

RECAP
82 April 23, 2003

MOTION filed by plaintiffs for protective order to protect absent class members from depositions by defendant : Exhibits (5) (nmr) (Entered: 04/23/2003)

RECAP
83 April 23, 2003

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL of motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff William Snell [78-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT (nmr) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

RECAP
84 April 28, 2003

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to strike supplemental memorandum in opposition to defendant's motion to increase the number of depositions [79-1] (nmr) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

RECAP
85 April 28, 2003

REPLY by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to response in opposition to motion to compel answers to interrogatories and request for production of documents [74-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT (nmr) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

RECAP
86 April 28, 2003

MOTION filed by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT to modify discovery order ; Exhibits (5) (nmr) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

RECAP
87 April 28, 2003

MEMORANDUM (AMENDED) by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT in support of motion to modify discovery order [86-1] by SODEXHO MARRIOTT; Exhibits (5) (nmr) (Entered: 04/29/2003)

RECAP
88 April 29, 2003

ERRATA by defendant SODEXHO MARRIOTT amending Local Rule 7.1(m) statement regarding defendant's motion to strike plaintiffs' surreply. (nmr) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Private Employment Class Actions

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 9, 2001

Closing Date: 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

African-American managers who were denied promotion due to disparate treatment

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Sodexho Marriott

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:01-cv-00510

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Auditing

Comply with advertising/recruiting requirements

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Discrimination Prohibition

Follow recruitment, hiring, or promotion protocols

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Monitoring

Monitor/Master

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Retaliation Prohibition

Utilize objective hiring/promotion criteria

Utilize objective job description

Amount Defendant Pays: $80 million

Order Duration: 2005 - 2010

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Recommended Citation